60
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] smeg@infosec.pub 36 points 1 month ago

Rent seeking behavior. They want subscription revenue instead of wanting to deliver what consumers want.

[-] SnoringEarthworm@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 month ago

For the most part, it's believed that carmakers are doing way with Android Auto support simply as a way to expand their control over user data. Because Android Auto utilizes your phone's connection, all of the data that runs through it goes straight to Android and the phone manufacturer. So, by utilizing built-in systems, the car manufacturers would indeed be able to collect more data about how you use the systems in place, while also possibly getting more money out of you through subscriptions.

You are unfortunately correct.

[-] BastingChemina@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 month ago

And then carmakers will cry that Chinese cars are reading over the market.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago

So manufacturers can bill you monthly for the same features...

[-] chunes@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

oh look another problem I'm too poor to have

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] haywire7@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

Back to the days of rip out the head unit and stick one in that does have the features you want?

[-] MurrayL@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

I imagine they’ll try to make this increasingly difficult; maybe even impossible.

[-] kenopsik@piefed.social 10 points 1 month ago

It already is for a lot of modern cars. Especially EVs. I imagine they are so tied into the functionality of the car that it makes the vehicle impossible to drive without the OEM headunit.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I just had a little magnetic clip for my air vent where I could attach my phone and put up a map.

I'd sooner go back to doing that than use a "Gemini-based AI assistant" in my fucking car.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] dangercake@feddit.uk 13 points 1 month ago

Removing smartphone integration from its vehicles opens the door for GM to grow its in-vehicle subscription revenue. Yep 💩

I'll happily celebrate whatever loss hits Google.

but this is so shitty I prefer Google

[-] melroy@kbin.melroy.org 11 points 1 month ago

I wish I could develop my own apps on my own car. I mean I own the car.. why can't I "sideload" my own created apps? Their apps are sht anyways.

[-] zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago

You can, but it's a Google filled minefield. A good view of it is reading into all of the trouble of using Android Auto in GrapheneOS without destroying all the privacy protections. It's essentially impossible to get navigation going without doing so, but audio for music and phone calls can be done with some hoop jumping. You're still probably better off just using bluetooth though.

load more comments (3 replies)

You probably can, just nobody bothers to do it. My Subaru has installable apps. Hell older Hondas (and possibly current ones) just run android. You can even get to the regular android UI on them.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[-] kieron115@startrek.website 9 points 1 month ago

How long until they start putting some kind of DRM in cars that prevents you from just installing an aftermarket android auto head unit?

[-] shenanigans4u@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

They've been trying that for a while. They do it by routing critical cat functions through the radio that don't need to go through there.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 7 points 1 month ago

Honestly, I think consumers allowing manufacturers to start integrating screens into cars was a mistake.

Knobs and dials are way easier to nevigate blind (whilst focusing on the road like we're meant to), and none of that stops you plugging in your own third party device for other features, or replacing the headboard yourself.

Giant tablets with complex menus are dangerous to drivers, and only serve to milk the consumer for things they already had access to in their car as standard not 10 years ago.

[-] warm@kbin.earth 4 points 1 month ago

Yes. It needs heavy regulation, physical buttons is all the driver should have access to.

We also need to ban subscription services in vehicles.

Consumers cannot be trusted to spend responsibly and look out for their best interests.

[-] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

The consumers did not allow anything. This is the crap they were eventually forced to buy due to lack of any other options. Electro-mechanical-chemical vehicle with a delco radio should be enough. We adopt new tech because it exists, not because we should.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Undearius@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago

I am always surprised I don't hear more discussion about Automotive Grade Linux.

https://www.automotivelinux.org/

[-] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago

Because it's corporate controlled embedded Linux, you aren't guaranteed any freedom or control. Hell you aren't even guaranteed access to a debug menu. Technically a car manufacturer could make a open a free car running embedded Linux that does give you freedom but the chances are absurdly low.

[-] Natanael@infosec.pub 4 points 1 month ago

TiVoization

[-] pogmommy@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago

Something something year of the Linux car

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 month ago

We need a Linux OS and DE for cars

i use carch btw

KDE Plasma Car: can use Customize Panel to move around physical parts of the car (HELP the steering wheel is inside the engine somehow HOWDOIFIXTHIS)

[-] Tharkys@lemmy.wtf 5 points 1 month ago

Guess I can remove Chevy/GM from my future vehicle short list.

[-] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 month ago

Fucking clickbait titles jfc

[-] terminal@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

Yep i never click on them as a form of protest

[-] LordCrom@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

2015 cars came with bluetooth support for hands free calling using your phone. This was great.

After that, it was replaced with carplay or android auto as the only means to get hands free calling. Stupid...stupid.

Plus, last 2 new cars i bought, i had to take the interior roof apart so i could access the built in cellular antennae wire and remove that spyware P.O.S. And by the way, car works fine without it.

[-] daq@lemmy.sdf.org 17 points 1 month ago

They didn't really replace it though. Pretty much every modern car sold today has Bluetooth. You don't have to use android auto.

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] HisArmsOpen@crust.piefed.social 3 points 1 month ago

GM are saying that their customers want a more seamless integration. Shareholders are slavering at the idea of owners collared to their subscription system. Buyers need to stop buying cars with stupid subscriptions. My 2nd hand BMW has a heated steering wheel that requires an annual fee to use. Nope, heated gloves are the solution!

[-] Zak@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I imagine you could wire your own mechanical switch to that steering wheel. Fuck them for doing that though.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Imaginary_Stand4909@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Every day I get more thankful for my hand-me-down car. It has no heated seats or anything fancy, but that also means no subscriptions, no wifi tracking/stalking, no digital touch screen over physical buttons, etc. All I've ever done is use a clip holder on my AC vent for my phone, so I'm used to it. It's given me time to see how others feel about Android Auto and features in newer cars, and I can make an informed decision whenever my baby decides to kick the bucket. Hopefully I can get something not too stalkerish nor with subscriptions.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jeena@piefed.jeena.net 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Why I like Android Auto:

  • I can plan my route on my phone at home and see the map on the big screen instead the little phone ui, or worse putting in the adress manually with the keyboard wheel in Korean instead of copy and pasting it from the Element chat
  • I already have all my music on my phone, I don't want to copy and organize it again for hours in my car
  • I already have integration with many apps on my phone, I don't want to set everything up again on the car, especially I can't copy and paste my long ass passwords from my KeePassXC into the car and need to painstakingly put in every password with their clunky keyboard, if they even have a keyboard.

I could go on forever. But as long as I can connect bluetooth and set up my phone somewhere so I can see the map while driving I'll be OK. The worst part, at work what I do is car infotainment system software, but it never has any of the features I would want from a car.

[-] Atherel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Plus if I rent a car that also has Android Auto I only have to pair it and all my stuff is there.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2025
60 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

79463 readers
464 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS