20
It’s phrased like the child has the control here
Correct headline: 62% of parents let/make their 2 and under children watch YouTube
Miss Rachel has content for under two year olds. But that's supposed to be watched together with a parent (or some other guardian).
This is extremely wrong on so many levels. No kid should be using tech until they're much, much older.
We watch YouTube on the tv without ads, it's not any different than any other streaming service.
How are you able to do this without ads? Are you using an Invidious frontend or something along those lines?
Smartube app on Android TV box, it also has built in sponsor block. I also removed all of the apps that the box came with, changed the front end and changed to an ad blocking DNS so that it's just the apps that I want on there and no ads anywhere.
I've heard about Smartube for an Invidious frontend, and it's really nice for sure. I know Roku has Playlet, and it's still on the Roku app ecosystem to this very day.
I mean, yea?
We watch sesame street and spiderman and friends on youtube
I haven't kept up but can you still watch eastern european spiderman impregnate Big Bird?
It's kind of amazing how captivating it is for our toddler just looking at family photos on a screen, and it adds weight to my theory that light-emitting colour screens themselves have a baseline addictive quality.
I let my kid watch sensory videos when she was a baby. The when she was older I let her sometimes watch educational stuff. It doesn’t mean she was watching AI slop or let her choose what to watch.
We showed our kid a 5-8 minute cartoon in the morning and in the evening at under 2. It was the only way to brush her teeth. Was I proud of it? No. Was it educational? No. Is it the best way to brush teeth? No. Did she have the shiniest teeth on the block? Absolutely yes.
I prefer the little harm of letting her watch The Little Mole on Youtube twice a day at 18 months old over having cavities or using force to brush her teeth. For months and months we tried every other method there is and eventually gave up and tried the TV.
Oh my God this is the only way I can clip my son's nails. He's the same age. Solidarity!
Yeah only time my 2 year old son watches a YouTube video is when brushing his teeth.
I think there's nothing wrong with that at all. Screentime is fine in limited, intentional doses with clear boundaries (and shows that are not complete dogshit, like Paw Patrol). Because we limit screen time, he's very excited to brush his teeth because he gets to watch a short cartoon video. I think it's much more problematic when it becomes a regular thing during the day, especially at mealtime. I see parents at restaurants with their kid glued to an iPad for an hour and it's depressing.
Try "Bluey" and "Blaze and the monster wheels"
It's more a consequence of parents not.having someone to watch the kid so they can go to a restaurant. It's awfully boring for a kid to sit through
Being bored is very important for children's development. It teaches them to use their imagination and emotional regulation.
Some suggestions for bored kids at the bottom of this article. https://theconversation.com/parents-you-dont-always-need-to-entertain-your-kids-boredom-is-good-for-them-136383
this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2025
20 points (100.0% liked)
Parenting
2971 readers
61 users here now
A place to talk about parenting.
Be respectful of others' parenting decisions.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS