56
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Babalugats@feddit.uk 4 points 1 day ago

Christ, Badenoch doesn't do too badly on that. It must pay to be stupid.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

These numbers are a bit daft to consider in isolation.

Badenoch is completely useless, and way to far the right of traditional conservative values. But she's also not got a snowball's chance in hell of ever becoming PM so people aren't as bothered by her as they would be if she was actually in charge doing these things.

In much the same way that no one would really care about starmer if he wasn't prime minister. The trouble is he is prime minister.

[-] tomiant@piefed.social 10 points 1 day ago

If you are "Sir" anything you do NOT belong as leader of the labor party.

[-] FishFace@piefed.social -4 points 1 day ago

Sounds pretty damn ignorant.

[-] ohulancutash@feddit.uk -3 points 1 day ago

If you can’t spell the name, you do NOT get an opinion on who is qualified to be leader.

See how easy it is to make arbitrary silliness?

[-] tomiant@piefed.social -3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Are you legitimately dumb? Do you think I think his name is "anything"? And I most certainly do get to say that anyone who is knighted has no place leading the labor party.

Oh shit, you dumbfuck, you complain about my American spelling of "labor"? Shove it up your twat you clown.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 19 hours ago

It's not the American spelling of labour it's the incorrect spelling of the party name.

[-] tacosanonymous@mander.xyz 10 points 1 day ago

"How much time ya got, buddy?"

[-] danielquinn@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Back in May, Adam Something posted a brilliant video called "Why Centrism Won't Survive 2025" and he made a very convincing case. Toward the end, he lays into Starmer's Labour specifically, though he doesn't predict the rise of the Greens here.

[-] LodeMike@lemmy.today 9 points 1 day ago

Captured opposition that wasn't supposed to win

[-] toebert@piefed.social 2 points 14 hours ago

They absolutely were, without them there's no rhetoric of "oh the other right wing party left us without money so we need to raise taxes to pay back debts", they're then also free to do all the unpopular shit to make sure they're not re-elected and there's money again to steal. It's a back and forth team effort.

[-] bearboiblake@pawb.social 4 points 18 hours ago

Calling Labour and/or US Democrats "captured opposition" takes away their complicity and agency.

They are just both right wing parties which do not represent your interests, and they never will.

Politics is a dead end. The only true change we will see in this world will come from revolution.

[-] Sunshine@piefed.ca 1 points 1 day ago

He’s on the way out!

this post was submitted on 31 Dec 2025
56 points (98.3% liked)

United Kingdom

5686 readers
287 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS