60
submitted 1 week ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

At least 31 states and the District of Columbia restrict cell phones in schools

New York City teachers say the state’s recently implemented cell phone ban in schools has showed that numerous students no longer know how to tell time on an old-fashioned clock.

“That's a major skill that they're not used to at all,” Tiana Millen, an assistant principal at Cardozo High School in Queens, told Gothamist of what she’s noticed after the ban, which went into effect in September.

Students in the city’s school system are meant to learn basic time-telling skills in the first and second grade, according to officials, though it appears children have fallen out of practice doing so in an increasingly digital world.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] EndOfLine@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

I've been hearing this since I was a kid, though back then they just blamed the use of digital clocks instead of phones.

[-] tal@lemmy.today 7 points 1 week ago

"These newfangled analog clocks with hands are killing the ability of people to understand clock bells. Kids these days."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Striking_clock

A striking clock is a clock that sounds the hours audibly on a bell, gong, or other audible device. In 12-hour striking, used most commonly in striking clocks today, the clock strikes once at 1:00 am, twice at 2:00 am, continuing in this way up to twelve times at 12:00 mid-day, then starts again, striking once at 1:00 pm, twice at 2:00 pm, and the pattern continues up to twelve times at 12:00 midnight.

The striking feature of clocks was originally more important than their clock faces; the earliest clocks struck the hours, but had no dials to enable the time to be read.[1] The development of mechanical clocks in 12th century Europe was motivated by the need to ring bells upon the canonical hours to call the community to prayer. The earliest known mechanical clocks were large striking clocks installed in towers in monasteries or public squares, so that their bells could be heard far away.

[-] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I just want to say, as someone who lives near such a bell, I'm grateful that they appear to observe "quiet hours" between 8pm and 8am. When I first moved in, I was worried it'd be dinging all night. Thank goodness that's not the case.

I just have car alarms going off for no reason at 4am to worry about.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] hushable@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Elder millennial here, I also struggle reading analogue clocks to this day. I can, but it just takes me a long time to do so. And I've been like this since I was a little kid.

[-] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

I used to think it was a meme too and I still think it is to a point. But several of my recent jobs were at universities and I have met several people younger than me now who cannot read an analog clock, use a mouse, copy a file to a flash drive, or make change. To say nothing of their ability to find information that can’t be googled (like the location of a classroom). I have really begun to feel that the general population has absolutely failed GenZ and I really hope we can break the pattern before GenAlpha gets much older.

[-] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

'Old clocks'? You mean... analog clocks? The ones in practically every household outside of America?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] super_user_do@feddit.it 6 points 1 week ago

I am 20 and I still remember newspapers and TV talking about "teenagers these days can't read clocks" since I can remember. it seems nobody has ever known 

[-] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

You make it sound like you’re old 😂

[-] leadore@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

It takes just a few minutes to learn how to read an analog clock. Once you've got the idea, you'll be slow deciphering the time at first, but once you start doing it, very quickly you'll be reading it immediately with just a glance.

I see analog clocks all over the place, especially waiting rooms and public buildings, and I have a very nice pretty one in my house. I think the people saying they're not being used anymore just aren't noticing them, they're just background scenery to them and don't enter their consciousness.

[-] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

It's not that stunning, they didn't grow up with them and you don't really see them in public these days.

[-] Stabbitha@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

We explicitly learned analog clocks in 1st grade, had worksheets and everything. What the hell are schools doing these days?

[-] thatradomguy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Still not teaching about taxes... or anything useful, clearly.

[-] chunes@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

People forget skills they don't use. I'm guessing you and I had plenty of practice reading analog clocks over the years until the skill became completely ingrained.

[-] Montagge@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

Judging by the stories my mom has after teaching for decades they no longer really teach anything. Nor are they allowed to. These days they have to follow a script for everything down to how you move your hands and when.

Disruptive student? Just keep teaching like nothings going on.

Student struggling with a subject? Don't stop to help or try a different method to help them learn. No child left behind so they'll still move up a grade even if they can't read or do simple addition.

Just make sure the students are in the classroom so the school gets money. Nothing else matters.

[-] Soulg@ani.social 1 points 1 week ago

... Not doing that anymore? Because they're very rare and you can easily get by without it most of the time

[-] BromSwolligans@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I work in schools. We have them in every hallway and classroom. But the kids do not know how to read them, and they don't even seem interested to learn even though it would take all of two minutes to wrap their head around. Seen it in the middle and high schools.

[-] thatradomguy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

30 yo and tbh not sure I really know how to read it right.

[-] leadore@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The little (shorter) hand points to the hour, the big (longer) hand points to the minutes. That's pretty much it. And of course the hands move clockwise.

edit: I should also note that for reading the hour, the number the hour hand points to is the number of the hour, but for reading the minutes, each number counts as 5 minutes. There are usually dots between the numbers--each dot is 1 minute. So between the 12 and the 1 is 5 minutes, 1 to 2 is 5 more minutes, so the minute hand pointing to the 2 means 10 minutes after the hour.

[-] tal@olio.cafe 4 points 1 week ago

Others have tried to evade the spirit of the ban, using other digital devices sich as older iPods, or bringing walkie-talkies to school.

I'm not an advocate of smartphone bans, but necessity is the mother of invention, and I suppose that if some kids start cobbling together packet radio solutions to talk with their friends and reach the Internet, it'll probably be an educational experience.

[-] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I'd be hilarious if they started using and contributing to the meshtastic network.

[-] FirstCircle@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

Yeah, especially with schools being somewhat evenly distributed around cities - this could really help with coverage. I've only read about Meshtastic but I recall it's extremely low bandwidth so that would be a problem for the little dissidents.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

It's a bit scary that anything children were once expected to learn has now become "the calculator". When calculators first came out the cry was 'why do we need to learn to do math any more when this device can do it for us?' Computers continued that trend. Smart phones even more so. It is a part of history that is hard to understand, how did a former, reasonably advanced civilization lose its advanced skills? We might be watching in real time how it happens. Except this time it is us, not an ancient civ.

[-] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Experienced software devs and tradesmen know this pain all too well. Frameworks and widgets make it easy to do stuff quickly, but no one knows how it works under the hood any more.

[-] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Next they’ll be surprised to find that they don’t know long division, cursive writing or 6502 assembly language

[-] adespoton@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Exactly. I’m wondering how many of those teachers could use a slide rule or even an abacus. We’re far enough along now that I bet the majority of teachers would also be lost when confronted with a log table or a topo map and a compass.

Astrolabe and sextant? They’d be totally lost.

I bet most teachers don’t know how to saddle a horse, card and spin wool and flax by hand, or even use a clutch on a manual transmission vehicle, either.

[edit] Ooh… thought of another one! I bet none of the children know how to use a rotary phone either. (In fact, since POTS has been fully DTMF for over 20 years, I doubt a dial phone would actually function today without a converter).

[-] MasterBlaster@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

And yet, we still have analog clocks all around us. Seems to me we should know his to use them... Unlike a sextant.

Still, knowing what those things are and how they work just might be useful if something similar becomes important for some reason.

Those things should be known by at least enough of the population to bring them back and use them if everything goes apocalyptic.

If things start falling apart, I'm throwing in with the Amish.

[-] Instigate@aussie.zone 3 points 1 week ago

Learning to read analogue clocks also helps provide some foundational learning for circular geometry - being able to quickly identify relevant segments of a circle and their respective fractions (5 minutes = 1/12 = 30° = π/6 rad etc.) helps build towards being able to compute circular geometric problems more easily in later years.

[-] tal@lemmy.today 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Youth of today are a failure. They neither show the initiative to adopt new and improved practices the way we broke from those of our parents' generation, nor the wisdom to recognize that our generation's ways are the correct ones and should be followed to the letter.

[-] MutilationWave@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago

Don't mind the people who can't get a joke, I thought this was funny.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Etterra@discuss.online 2 points 1 week ago

Gen-Xer here - do they not teach kids this in kindergarten or 1st grade or w/e anymore?

[-] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

Students in the city’s school system are meant to learn basic time-telling skills in the first and second grade, according to officials, though it appears children have fallen out of practice doing so in an increasingly digital world.

They're supposed to, but if they never use it because they don't have to, they'll just forget how.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] oxysis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 week ago

It’s almost like you gotta teach people how to do things, that people aren’t just inherently born with all the knowledge to survive. Crazy I know.

[-] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

When I was a kid, we had whole educational units on this. Like with a special demonstration clock and worksheets and everything.

How are kids supposed to learn if schools don't teach them?

[-] eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago

All these kids are gonna fail their dementia tests in 60 years. 😝

(Yes that's how it long it takes psychologists to update stuff, they still give out psych testers from the 1940s for stuff like custody evaluations)

[-] Cnote5@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Some might call this a "teachable moment ", no?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Ok by why does this matter. Most people can't read a sundial either?

[-] Echolynx@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 week ago

We don't really use sundials still. We still use analog clocks though because they're efficient and if it ain't broke, why fix it?

[-] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago

Not only that but Technology Connections got me thinking about analog clocks in a whole new way.

If it's 1:40 and you know you gotta leave in half an hour, you don't need to know that you need to leave at 2:10...just 'when the big hand does half a lap from now'.

It's better for visualizing time, if that makes sense?

[-] zebidiah@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

I think of it like pizza time, I have this big a slice until something happens or I have to be somewhere or whatever

[-] thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Most likely more digital then analog clocks these days. I can read analog but I cant remember the last time I needed. Besides the both do the same job but one is quicker and more accessible.

People are really scared of change but just because something is new doesn't mean it's bad.

[-] Echolynx@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago

That depends. People have different brains. If you've got dyscalculia, analog is probably easier.

It's a lot more effort to take down working analog clocks and replace them with digital ones; the analog clocks we've got on towers and all aren't going anywhere.

I don't think it's always a fear of change. Sometimes it's just comfort in the familiar.

[-] thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

No need to take them down, eventually they will need to be replaced and most people have a phone or a digital watch anyway. It's just not super priority. I think reading comprehension should be a higher concern

[-] Echolynx@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

Agreed, it's a gradual process. I would be inclined to agree, but there still is a sizable watch heads population, even among younger folks, so who knows.

Definitely, literacy is key. What decades of defunding the humanities and liberal arts does...

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Incblob@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

There's concern that young people have very poorly developed analog knowledge. Humans usually learn better by combining sensory inputs, such as learning better by writing things down or tying things to memories. Smells famously tie into memories very well. By only typing, and having very little connections to the real world in the context of learning, there is the fear that they will learn less and also not be able to learn, since they are lacking those sensory connections. They also have horrible handwriting, probably spelling as well due to autocorrect. This is practically not a problem, but if the next generations grow up not knowing "how to language", that is probably not ideal.

[-] blueamigafan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I used to get this as a kid, this would have been about 1990 when I was 6 and at no point did anybody realise IT WAS BECAUSE NO-ONE TAUGHT ME, after that my mom spent an evening explaining it to me and after that I was fine. This is why I hate those videos where they give kids retro tech and laugh at them for not knowing how to use them, despite never being shown them before.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2026
60 points (95.5% liked)

News

34115 readers
571 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS