493
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 4 days ago

I prefer to cut the pinky finger off of infants instead. It hasn't hurt them at all not having a pinky finger, it's not the whole hand just the tip. And it's not just cosmetic because I dislike pinky fingers aesthetically, it's healthier too, do you know how many people get pinky finger infections every year?

[-] Zozano@aussie.zone 11 points 4 days ago

That makes sense, but are you also taking the girls, slicing the webbing between the fingers, and sewing their fingers together, so they don't hold hands before marriage?

[-] xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 142 points 5 days ago

Well, yeah. I mean, take a step back and forget about religious justifications and appeals to some nebulous 'tradition' for a moment. If I ran around and took a scalpel to the genitals of baby boys without a valid medical reason, I'd hopefully swiftly find myself locked up for a long, long time.

[-] fartsparkles@lemmy.world 108 points 5 days ago

It’s genital mutilation. It’s been done for religious reasons, cultural reasons, social reasons, for slavery reasons, and more.

But cutting up babies’ genitals for any reason except medical intervention for relevant pathologies is genital mutilation.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Well, of course, that's crazy behaviour.

But if you did it in a religious ritualistic ceremony and sucked the blood off the tip of the babies dicks afterwards, well that wouldn't be weird now, would it.

You could even call it "Metzitzah B'peh" and it would happen so regularly and kids would get herpetic infections from the mohel's so often ([sometimes even dying]) (https://abcnews.go.com/Health/baby-dies-herpes-virus-ritual-circumcision-nyc-orthodox/story?id=15888618) that the New York Health department would have to issue warnings about it, and it would still not be weird, even when the families of the babies affected would refuse to name the mohel's to allow the health dept to investigate and have them banned from performing the practice on future babies.

[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

But there is a medical reason! It's to make masturbation bothersome. It would really upset the humors you know.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[-] GarboDog@lemmy.world 20 points 4 days ago

It should be illegal, thank goodness it’s finally being considered

load more comments (48 replies)
[-] karashta@piefed.social 97 points 5 days ago

I'm pissed off someone did this to me without my consent as a baby. 

[-] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 21 points 5 days ago

That’s such an understatement but we’re taught it’s normal

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] Diddlydee@feddit.uk 67 points 5 days ago

'possible'

Cutting a bit from an unconsenting baby's body. It's insane.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Jumbie@lemmy.zip 65 points 5 days ago

Good. Stop mutilating babies.

[-] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 44 points 5 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I highly doubt this will happen, unfortunately.

All it takes is certain lobbyists and press saying it's anti-Semitic and/or islamophobic and it'll be dropped in a heartbeat.

Religious extremists need to join the 21st century. It angers me that we did such a great job of shifting away from the church having a stranglehold on our lives and laws, only to then accept shit like this. Freedom of religion should be about believing what you want, not doing what you want.

Fingers crossed, though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Horsey@lemmy.world 30 points 5 days ago

This needs to go the way of foot binding. It's such an evil practice.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Deceptichum@quokk.au 29 points 5 days ago

The UK possibly doing something good? What timeline is this.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] FishFace@piefed.social 27 points 5 days ago

I don't see how this will see the light of day given sensitivity towards Judaism at the moment. Unfortunately a lot of people think that anything which conflicts a religion has a different standard and that a little bit of abuse is then ok.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2026
493 points (99.0% liked)

United Kingdom

5747 readers
191 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS