1
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by anneSong@lemmy.world to c/unpopularopinion@lemmy.world

I (21f) am 5'5" and skinny. I recently attended a self-defense class, and there I was tought how to use a pocket knife. And as I have some male friends 6'5"+ tall, I thought that that height actually makes their belly particularly vulnerable in case of a fight (compared to a short guy/girl):

  1. a short person's shoulder height is around the same level as the the tall person's belly making it easier to stab/hit;
  2. a tall guy's belly is proportionally a larger target.

And in general, if a 6'5"+ guy stands in front of me with his stomach released (even if he has just a bit of a belly) it feels like having an exposed, large and squishy punching/stabbing bag right in front of me, into which, if needed, I can easily harshly and deeply plunge anything straight away.

I also practice historical fencing (rapier) and most of the times I stab tall opponents into the belly - my favorite thrusts are ducking counterattacks when I duck while they attack, go low and impale a tall guy's unprotected belly right onto my rapier.

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] kiwikerfuffle@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago

As someone else who is short and skinny, this is a very dangerous assumption. I've trained in judo, karate, and wrestling, and gotten in a couple actual fights, so have some experience here. In a real fight for your life being shorter is a disadvantage, even more so if you have average length arms for your height. It's possible to overcome that disadvantage if you are more skilled than the opponent, but assuming equal skill you are likely to lose.

In an actual fight, going for a gut stab with a knife is one of the worst options you have. It means you are absolutely within grapple range, have done almost nothing to hinder their mobility, and even if it is eventually fatal, it often takes a very long time to die from a gut wound. You would be much better either going for a hit that would instantly kill them, or aiming for somewhere that would hinder their mobility enough for you to escape.

Also, in the real world it doesn't work like fencing, no one is going to break the fight up as soon as you score a hit. If you want to actually prepare for a fight you should try out a sport that doesn't break on point scoring. In general boxing, MMA, or wrestling would be a better option to prepare for a real fight that doesn't get broken up.

[-] higgsboson@piefed.social 1 points 1 month ago

I'd almost recommend getting in an actual fight so you can learn how different it is from your imagination.

Take a real self-defense class. In reality, your size is not enough advantage to make up for an opponent's added strength and reach. Training and speed, however can bridge that gap somewhat, assuming your opponent is not on an equal footing, so to speak.

[-] skozzii@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

The reach is the big one...

[-] Dasus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Okay OP. Okay. I'm sure you'll absolutely devastate someone by trying to slash at their jacket. Lol.

[-] RagnarokOnline@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago

I disagree with your opinion. I think being the shorter person in a fight is generally a disadvantage.

All else equal, the person who is taller will likely have more mass, and thus have more muscle to utilize against you. They’ll also have a bigger wingspan, so their zone of threat is bigger.

When I used to study martial arts, my instructors always used to say “don’t bring anything to a street fight that you don’t want taken away and used against you”. Unless you have the element of surprise, and are using a knife that’s attached to your body, welding a knife against someone bigger may backfire. Being a master of de-escalation tends to have a better mortality rate ;)

[-] Ethalis@jlai.lu 1 points 1 month ago

That's interesting. Do you manage to land those hits consistently once the element of surprise is gone? I also practice historical fencing (but I mostly do arming sword and langes messer, though I've occasionally dabbled with rapier), and my experience has been that taller people usually have the reach advantage.

Ducking and thrusting straight ahead of you makes basic geometry work in your favour for compensating the reach disadvantage (your arm has a 90° angle giving you maximum range), but it also massively exposes your head of your first hit doesn't land, and prevents you from using footwork for a few seconds. Once your opponent's has figured out your strategy it would seem like he would just have to stay a bit out of reach and counter-attack/riposte while you recover from your ducking

this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2026
1 points (100.0% liked)

Unpopular Opinion

8809 readers
8 users here now

Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!


How voting works:

Vote the opposite of the norm.


If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.



Guidelines:

Tag your post, if possible (not required)


  • If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
  • If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].


Rules:

1. NO POLITICS


Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.


2. Be civil.


Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Please also refrain from gatekeeping others' opinions.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...


Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.


5. No trolling.


This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.


6. Defend your opinion


This is a bit of a mix of rules 4 and 5 to help foster higher quality posts. You are expected to defend your unpopular opinion in the post body. We don't expect a whole manifesto (please, no manifestos), but you should at least provide some details as to why you hold the position you do.



Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS