16

Exciting news for those enough who are 40+ and spend too much time in front of a computer screen: a Finnish startup called IXI is promising to end the era of clunky bifocals and the 'head-tilt' struggle of progressive lenses, replacing them with a pair of glasses that focus as naturally as the human eye using a combination of infrared eye tracking and liquid crystal-transparent indium tin oxide glasses

top 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] buttmasterflex@piefed.social 5 points 3 months ago

Yeeeeaaaahhhh, I'm going to go ahead and stick with a one time payment for proven 250+ year old technology instead of what would very likely be a subscription based privacy nightmare that can revoke my access to clear sight whenever they update their T&Cs. Hard pass, get fucked with a splintery utility pole.

[-] MummifiedClient5000@feddit.dk 3 points 3 months ago

But just imagine what it can do for personalized ads. Why won't anyone think of the advertisers?

[-] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 1 points 3 months ago

If you think glasses are a one-time cost, I feel like you've never worn glasses. I had 10 years in my life where my vision didn't change, and now I need bifocals/progressives. Given the nature of the condition, I expect to have to get new prescriptions every 2 to 4 years until I die or go blind.

That said, the rest of your comment is quite likely painfully true, especially if Amazon has their fingers in it.

[-] buttmasterflex@piefed.social 1 points 3 months ago

I should have clarified one time cost for frames and a pair of lenses compared against a potential (likely) subscription. I have personally worn bifocals for the last 21 years.

[-] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 0 points 3 months ago

21 years with the same frames?

[-] buttmasterflex@piefed.social 1 points 3 months ago

Again, no. My point is that if I purchase a pair of frames with lenses, the transaction is over. I would not have to pay a monthly subscription for those same glasses and lenses to remain functional, which is much more likely for a set of glasses infused with technology and tracking, backed by Amazon.

The tech glasses positied here would still need to be updated periodically. Per the article, they have a base prescription lens that then has additional focusing ability layered on via the technology.

[-] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 0 points 3 months ago

Yeah, but that isn't a one-time cost, either. That's a recurring cost, typically on a biannual basis, and usually much higher than the monthly subscription. That said, being able to walk out with something that is going to reliably work for the next couple years definitely has its benefits. Ive just never considered something with a definite lifespan and a requirement to replace as a one-time cost. Kind of like the difference between paying property taxes monthly or yearly - I'm still paying and it isn't going to stop.

[-] buttmasterflex@piefed.social 1 points 3 months ago

I get your point on that. My assumption with the tech glasses is that you purchase the hardware outright and pay a subscription for the software functionality, similar to other tech devices that have fallen to enshitification. The prime difference I see is that standard glasses packages are a one time lump payment vs a one time lump payment followed by a slow bleed of money. Yes, prescriptions change, frames break, etc., but on a 1:1 comparison level, you get more reliable functionality and cost effectiveness through regular glasses rather than something that can be bricked through a bad software/firmware update or rendered nonfunctional by the manufacturer if you reject an invasive privacy policy or let a subscription lapse.

[-] E_coli42@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Subscription based? Why would something like this even have internet connectivity in the first place, let alone a subscription?

[-] buttmasterflex@piefed.social 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Bold assumption on my part here, but why would the manufacturer of such a juicy target for tracking not make it with connectivity? Something like this would be monetized and milked for advertising and subscription revenue on principle alone. Eye tracking technology that determines vision clarity based on where the user looks is but a small skip and a jump from advertising based on where the user looks.

ETA: Per the first line of the article, the company is backed by Amazon.

[-] Glytch@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Future versions won't focus properly unless you look at an Amazon ad for 60 seconds. No closing your eyes or looking away. The glasses can tell if you're paying attention.

[-] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 5 points 3 months ago

Amazon-backed

Hard pass.

[-] PierceTheBubble@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 months ago

Honestly, the tech seems quite impressive. But I wouldn't touch Amazon-backed smart glasses, which "could also provide health insights, such as detecting dry eyes or monitoring posture", with a ten-foot pole; especially when there's also entirely passive bifocals and progressives.

[-] a1studmuffin@aussie.zone 4 points 3 months ago

I really hate late stage capitalism for this. Any useful invention is quickly captured and enshittified for profit. If this came out 20-30 years ago I doubt anyone would have reservations.

[-] PierceTheBubble@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago

Couldn't agree more

[-] palmtrees2309@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Good luck when your glasses subscriptions end.

[-] tehn00bi@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Good luck when the batteries die.

[-] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 5 points 3 months ago

When the battery dies, the glasses continue to function as a traditional pair of single-vision specs, ensuring the wearer is never left in the dark or have safety compromised such as when driving or operating machinery.

[-] fubarx@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Subscription unlocks ability to also run in slow motion.

[-] mp3@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 months ago

The part that worries me is what happens when the glasses batteries are empty. Do they get fall back to "long-distance / myopia" mode so that you can still see at at distance and able to drive?

I love tinkering with gadgets, but sometimes the manufacturers of these tech-based version forget to cover the basics before enhancing it with tech.

A good example are smartwatches. They can be filled with sensors, but they need to at least do one thing well, and that is to show time reliably.

[-] Maestro@fedia.io 3 points 3 months ago

Per another commenter (and the article):

When the battery dies, the glasses continue to function as a traditional pair of single-vision specs, ensuring the wearer is never left in the dark or have safety compromised such as when driving or operating machinery.

[-] mp3@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago

At least they covered that 😬

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Clunky bifocals?

Vs the battery, camera, and focusing mechanism these are going to need?

[-] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 1 points 3 months ago

I'm cautiously optimistic. This looks like a reasonable use of tech that doesn't seem to have so many of the spyware elements that other glasses (like Meta) have. There's no external camera, no screens (only lenses), and no mention needing an app or internet connection.

As someone in their target demographic I'm interested to find out what is actually released and would consider purchasing a pair.

[-] Candice_the_elephant@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I'm be ready to try it. Having to take my readers off to walk around, and put them on to glance at my phone is a real drag. I also need another pair for using my PC as the screen is further away. It's a real hassle, so I'd pay really good money to have a good looking pair that auto-adjusts for these uses.

If it's a subscription model though, it can eat a bag of dicks.

[-] tgcoldrockn@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Oh I remember this bullshit. I remember when headphones used to just work. Now they take 10+ minutes of my day troubleshooting the connection, battery, pairing, etc. to listen to music which I now rent but used to own on a stereo which didn't surveil me and sell my data. NOW youre telling me I can go FUCK MYSELF with new techbro glasses? SIGN ME UP!

[-] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 1 points 3 months ago

My Bose noise canceling headphones do not allow noise canceling when you use the audio jack, only for Bluetooth. It's maddening. Found this out on a plane when it was too late to do anything about it.

[-] billwashere@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

As a 55 man constantly switching glasses, taking them off, losing the “right” pair, etc. please please please …

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 months ago
[-] billwashere@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

I have them. I also have a large monitor both at home and at work that the sweet spot for being able to focus is a narrow range toward the bottom. So I have a pair of single vision computer glasses that I either misplace or forget I’m still wearing when I leave the office to drive home. So I’m still constantly switching glasses. Yeah I know …. first world problems. I want my old eyes back. Getting old sucks.

I just want a technological fix for what my eyes used to be able to do on their own.

[-] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 0 points 3 months ago

I have a pair on right now. They're better than not seeing correctly, but only being able to focus on a computer screen with less than a third of your vertical field of view sucks. There are options, but one of the best is having more sets of glasses, which isn't convenient or cheap. These could solve that. I'm sure Amazon will make it not worth it at some point, though.

[-] YetAnotherNerd@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 months ago

Zenni. Have your doc write a scrip for standalone monitor glasses and have them fill that. (Had bad luck with Zenni doing progressives, but a simple reader prescription? $20)

[-] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 1 points 3 months ago

Ive thought of it. Probably going to do sunglasses first, t'hough. Or rather second, after my single vision safety glasses.

[-] optissima@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 months ago
[-] xenomor@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Don’t worry, they’ll make a version with advertisements inserted into the field of view for the poors.

[-] xenomor@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

They can block view of specific things, and force you to pay to unlock them. They can also add features you can subscribe to, like ‘make your spouse look more attractive’. I tell you, the business possibilities are endless.

this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2026
16 points (94.4% liked)

Technology

84324 readers
199 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS