48
all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Darkcoffee@sh.itjust.works 22 points 2 weeks ago
[-] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 21 points 2 weeks ago

O, oh... Somebody's worried about their investment...

[-] rimu@piefed.social 14 points 2 weeks ago

Nvidia stock price has been flat since September. Almost 6 months. He's feeling the pressure.

[-] morto@piefed.social 6 points 2 weeks ago
[-] TheBat@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago
[-] OldChicoAle@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Not to Jensen though

[-] ABetterTomorrow@sh.itjust.works 20 points 2 weeks ago
[-] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 weeks ago

Okay, I’m positive it’s a waste of energy since it doesn’t work.

[-] yesman@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago
[-] Tharkys@lemmy.wtf 13 points 2 weeks ago

"[It's] extremely hurtful, frankly, and I think we've done a lot of damage," he said.

Weird, I didn't know both Jensen and I felt the same way about AI.

[-] klopstock@feddit.org 4 points 2 weeks ago

“It’s not helpful. It’s not helpful to people. It’s not helpful to the industry. It’s not helpful to society. It’s not helpful to the governments,”

[-] willington@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 weeks ago

I can get used to the billionaires begging me.

[-] MOARbid1@piefed.social 11 points 2 weeks ago

Get rekt nerd.

[-] DFX4509B@lemmy.wtf 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Hell no, and Nvidia can fuck right off with this shit, right alongside MS, and anyone else who pulls this crap.

GenAI is a scam and I will continue to refer to it as such as long as free speech still exists in my country.

[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

I smoked weed when it was illegal. I'll speak freely when it's illegal.

And one day I'll shit on Art Modell's grave. That's not really relevant to AI, but I'm still gonna do it.

[-] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

No. My negativity towards AI fuels my continued existence.

[-] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 6 points 2 weeks ago

No thanks, I'm good

[-] AlexLost@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Why? It totally sucks and is ruining the world in almost every corner. Fuck AI with a sharp stick.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

He's one of the richest men in the world and you're harshing his vibes. Isn't that enough?

[-] AlexLost@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Good. I want his vibe harshed.

[-] snoons@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 weeks ago

Even if I could find a use for it, I still wouldn't because of how error prone it is. If I have to double check the output, why should I even bother? Fuck of Jensen. Get bankrupt'd.

[-] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago
[-] FreddiesLantern@leminal.space 2 points 2 weeks ago

“It’s extremely hurtful”

Not enough tho.

[-] goatinspace@feddit.org 2 points 2 weeks ago
[-] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

"Just pour money and we'll solve these little problems, trust me bro, just a few trillion more, we're almost there" vibes

[-] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 2 points 2 weeks ago

AI works, we lose our jobs.

AI doesn't work, bubble pops, we lose our jobs.

AI sorta kinda works, wages get depressed and things turn into a dystopian hellhole.

Not that much reason to be positive and he doesn't know how to fix it.

Huang doesn’t have a solution for the very real risk of job displacement

[-] DasFaultier@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

I guess it's implied, but he doesn't have a solution because for him it's not a problem, it's the intended result.

[-] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 2 points 2 weeks ago

Like that time they asked Peter Thiel if he thinks the human race should survive, and there was this long pregnant pause.

[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago
[-] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago
[-] whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Complaining about imaginary regulatory capture for non-existent regulations because 100 billion isn't enough blood money, also only CEO quotes no labor leaders.

[-] Ghostwurm@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 weeks ago

It's destroying our economy, our ecology, our politics, our society. What's not to like?

[-] Zacryon@feddit.org -1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

To be fair, capitalism is inherently incompatible with advancements in robotics and AI. Doesn't mean the technology is destroying the economics and society. The socio-economic system was already broken to begin with.

this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2026
48 points (96.2% liked)

Technology

79463 readers
417 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS