95

Source https://lemmy.ml/comment/23388040

Join the lemmy.ml boycott today and help foster a better Lemmy-verse! No more posts, comments (except to counter their propaganda ofc!) or upvotes on any comms on the Lemmy.ml instance! To make this easy you can do an instance block at Settings > Block Tab > Scroll to bottom > Input "lemmy.ml" and apply

And consider donating to individual instances instead.

Check the megathread for more!

top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 54 points 1 month ago

Remember when China sent their military into Hong Kong? Pepperidge Farms remembers.

YhSnGH0y2htDaGv.jpg

ndlYaC0peLOPHu0.jpg

mE3tMRa2BU251z8.jpg

sUX5yEbGHwmRjKm.jpg

KU2aGlbFVfuieOE.jpg

4jNLHhTWSb6JkC9.jpg

[-] MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net 9 points 1 month ago
[-] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 8 points 1 month ago

It was a good attempt but the protestors failed and Hong Kong is occupied territory.

[-] MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net 15 points 1 month ago

That's... what I said? Liberated. Like China did to Tibet. And Russia is doing to Ukraine. For what is liberty if not being forcibly subjected to the laws of a foreign government asserting that the land and populace is theirs by divine/historical/imagined right? Sure Hong Kong governed itself perfectly well before Britain unclenched their greedy imperialist hands. And sure, China agreed to let Hong Kong continue to govern itself afterwards. But when it comes down to it, those people belong to China. They needed to be liberated from the idea that they were independent. Had those protestors simply submitted to The Party, a lot of hubbub could have been avoided.

Should I lay it on thicker, or would an /s suffice? My internal Poe's Law is having a field day with this.

[-] goat@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago

haha, nah, it's because we've had tankies who unironically say that stuff

[-] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

At least you're aware of your shortcomings.

On the fediverse there are A LOT of tankies who unironically would call it a liberation.

[-] alci@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago

And US to Venezuela, Iran and soon Greenland, or Israel to Libanon, Gaza and Cisjordania... Every imperialist countries are the same, including the western side. So it's hard to give any lesson...

[-] MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net 5 points 4 weeks ago

So it's hard to give any lesson...

Only if your stance demands that one "side" can do no wrong while the other "side" is cartoonishly evil. Otherwise the lesson is pretty simple. Don't simp for states.

[-] TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 month ago

Taiwan does claim to be the Republic of China, and to also own mainland China. Mainland China calls itself the People's Republic of China, and claims to own Taiwan and various other places.

[-] Skavau@piefed.social 19 points 1 month ago

Taiwan literally can't safely officially repudiate the 'one china' policy from their end because of the possibility that China would see that as declaring independence and potentially regard that as justification for military intervention. No-one in Taiwan seriously believes that it is conceivable to retake the mainland, nor any other historically old ROC territories.

[-] I_Clean_Here@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Yes, general knowledge. I agree that Taiwan should invade the mainland and take what is theirs.

[-] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 4 points 1 month ago

Personally I'd say no, the government of mainland China has it's well known authoritarian tendencies, but it's still much better than a warzone or area under foreign military occupation would be, in the hypothetical case where the Taiwanese government gained the military capacity for this somehow, and Taiwan and the mainland have had decades for cultural divergence to occur, some extremely transformative decades at that, so close as they might still be, it would still be a foreign invasion for china at this point.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

Based davel admitting ROC owns the mainland.

[-] Eldritch@piefed.world 9 points 1 month ago

Mainland Taiwan?

[-] Rhoeri@piefed.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

I seriously think that dude’s brain is damaged.

[-] goat@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago

nah, don't brush off his extremism as a mental impairment, that's unfair. He knows full well how disingenuous he's being.

[-] Rhoeri@piefed.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

But for him to think this shit makes any sense in realty shows there’s something off.

[-] verdi@tarte.nuage-libre.fr 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Everyone, including Taiwan, was happy with the status quo, till Trump and Biden (who else besides nazis and neocons) decided to stir some shit and ruin the peace and prosperity of the region... And the ml guy is the tankie and baddie... JFC... You fucking usanians have the overton window so fucked that you think socialized healthcare for all is comunism but you think respecting a UN resolution is being a tankie... 

Here's an interesting question, you've been shooting thousands of kids per year because bearing arms is a right so you can deal with a tyrannical government... Where's the well regulated militia now that people are being summarily executed in the streets? Leave the SE Asia region alone and neither Taiwan or China will ever have a conflict...

[-] Skavau@piefed.social 2 points 3 weeks ago

Everyone, including Taiwan, was happy with the status quo

Okay? It's still the status quo. The status-quo is Taiwan de facto independence. What's your point here?

till Trump and Biden (who else besides nazis and neocons) decided to stir some shit and ruin the peace and prosperity of the region…

How did they do that?

Leave the SE Asia region alone and neither Taiwan or China will ever have a conflict…

What if specific countries want US support?

[-] verdi@tarte.nuage-libre.fr 1 points 3 weeks ago

All of answers to your questions are either in the post itself or linked information... 

[-] Skavau@piefed.social 2 points 3 weeks ago

No, they are not. At all.

[-] Sharkticon@lemmy.zip -4 points 1 month ago

That is the official stance of most of the world including Taiwan itself.

[-] Skavau@piefed.social 15 points 1 month ago

As stated: Taiwan literally can’t safely officially repudiate the ’one china’ policy from their end because of the possibility that China would see that as declaring independence and potentially regard that as justification for military intervention. No-one in Taiwan seriously believes that it is conceivable to retake the mainland, nor any other historically old ROC territories.

In terms of the rest of the world, 'one china' is expressed as a form of strategic ambiguity in reference to Taiwan.

[-] Sharkticon@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 month ago

Yes I'm aware of why everyone says the same thing officially, I'm just stating that everyone says it. Is hardly a unique thing to say.

[-] Skavau@piefed.social 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Right, but I don't think that davel (shown in the OP) is being intellectually honest regarding the 'one china' policy and how the Taiwanese actually se it.

[-] Sharkticon@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Perhaps, but the truth remains that both China and Taiwan have always claimed it is part of China. It's not an inaccurate thing to say. So it was a faulty argument to begin with because China was never claiming a Sovereign Nation that had never not been China according to everybody.

It was always a poor argument especially when there are far better versions of that argument to make such as their attempted stealing of territory belonging to the Philippines.

this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2026
95 points (94.4% liked)

MeanwhileOnGrad

2125 readers
11 users here now

"Oh, this is calamity! Calamity! Oh no, he's on the floor!"

Welcome to MoG!


Meanwhile On Grad


Documenting hate speech, conspiracy theories, apologia/revisionism, and general tankie behaviour across the fediverse. Memes are welcome!


What is a Tankie?


Alternatively, a detailed blog post about Tankies.

(caution of biased source)


Basic Rules:

Sh.itjust.works Instance rules apply! If you are from other instances, please be mindful of the rules. — Basically, don't be a dick.

Hate-Speech — You should be familiar with this one already; practically all instances have the same rules on hate speech.

Apologia(Using the Modern terminology for Apologia) No Defending, Denying, Justifying, Bolstering, or Differentiating authoritarian acts or endeavours, whether it be a Pro-CCP viewpoint, Stalinism, Islamic Terrorism or any variation of Tankie Ideology.

Revisionism — No downplaying or denying atrocities past and present. Calling Tankies shills, foreign/federal agents, or bots also falls under this rule. Extremists exist. They are real. Do not call them shills or fake users, as it handwaves their extremism.

Off-topic Discussion — Do not discuss unrelated topics to the point of derailing the thread. Stay focused on the direct content of the post, rather than engaging in arguments that lack mutual agreement.

Brigading/Trolling — If you're here because this community was linked in another thread, please refrain from maliciously voting, commenting, or manipulating the post in any way. This includes alt accounts. All votes are public, and if you are found to be brigading, you will be banned. Good-faith and honest communication is an exception.

Tankies can explain their views, but may be criticised or challenged for them. Any minor infraction of the rules may result in a warning and possibly a temporary ban.

You'll be warned if you're violating the instance and community rules. Continuing poor behaviour after being warned will result in a ban or removal of your comments. Bans typically last only 24 hours, but each subsequent infraction doubles the duration. Depending on the content, the ban time may be increased. You may request an unban at any time.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS