59
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] heyWhatsay@slrpnk.net 18 points 1 week ago

Totally justified.

Jk, but so much focus on the handheld videogames, and not the handheld gun... Must be Merica

[-] RamRabbit@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The hard parts of murdering someone you live with has always been: 1) people don't actually want to murder others; and 2) getting away with it. Clearly this kid was not concerned with either of these.

so much focus on the handheld videogames, and not the handheld gun

It isn't hard for anyone you live with to kill you if they make even a basic plan. The same effect can be accomplished with a knife, something readily accessible in any kitchen. The interesting part of this story is the murderous 11-year-old, which is why everyone is focusing on him.

[-] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

It is FAR more difficult, both physically and emotionally to kill someone with a knife than a firearm.

There are millions, if not a billion of kids in the world. And I'm willing to bet, that over the past 100 years. Homicides committed by kids, are heavily skewed towards gunfire over stabbings. Even if we exclude child-soldiers.

I would even wager that homicides by kids with guns in the US, far outweighs homicides by kids with knives, world wide.

[-] stephen01king@piefed.zip 1 points 1 week ago

Well, the fact that the kid went for a gun instead of a readily accessible knife is either because the gun is even more readily accessible than the knife or that guns are much preferred when it comes to performing a murder.

In the latter, the kid might've decided that the hard parts of murdering his father might not be worth dealing with if he doesn't have easy enough access to the gun in the first place. So the question goes back to why it was so easy for an 11 year old to get his hand on a gun in the first place.

[-] frongt@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

Sounds like he came across it while searching for the Switch, so yes it was more readily accessible in the moment.

[-] RamRabbit@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

Kid certainly won't be getting another Switch...

[-] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 week ago

Back in my day, he would've gotten the switch. Just not the one he wanted.

[-] homes@piefed.world 6 points 1 week ago

Then you must have a strong opinion on The King’s new Tea Tax.

[-] Guitarfun@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Lol, I'm 34 and my parents hit me with just about anything within arms reach when I was young. Getting the switch might have been the better alternative.

[-] homes@piefed.world 6 points 1 week ago

Uh… I’m really sorry to hear that.

[-] Guitarfun@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

No worries dude, I'm glad most people have pretty much given up that style of parenting. Spanking and abuse was still pretty common in the 90s though.

[-] homes@piefed.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Maybe where you grew up, but I grew up in the 80s and 90s, and that sort of thing was unheard of. And very much considered completely and utterly unacceptable.

I’m sorry that’s not how you grew up.

[-] Guitarfun@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Thanks man, don't worry about it. It was a long time ago and I left that place and never looked back. I think a lot of it has to do with how much money your family had. I grew up super poor and never had a stable place to live and my parents took a lot of their frustrations out on my siblings and myself. Mostly me as the oldest of five children. I know I went through more than most people, but I've traveled around the country and most people I've met had some kind of parental corporal punishment.

I have had friends who lived in middle class and upper middle class families and it was a completely different environment from what I was used to. I also grew up in a poor red state and a lot of what people believe there was completely backwards and probably still is.

[-] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago

Why the downvotes? Lol. This is accurate for that time period.

[-] ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 week ago

Sounds like the solution here is to regulate and license people's access to Nintendo Switches!

[-] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Either the dad was a prick or the kid is a psychopath that belongs in a mental institution.

[-] Lembot_0006@programming.dev 3 points 1 week ago

Or the accusation is wrong, or circumstances are unknown, or maybe even something else :)

[-] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

I think a little bit of both.

[-] RamRabbit@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I feel particularly bad for the mother (and any siblings). She lost a husband and a child this day.

[-] NotSteve_@piefed.ca 2 points 1 week ago

I feel like there must have been something else going on

[-] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 1 points 1 week ago

This must be the resistance to tyranny the NRA go on about

[-] Railcar8095@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

"Resistance to tyranny? We meant resistance to trannies"

*NRA and MAGA

[-] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

A different article I read earlier (sorry, it's too early and I'm too lazy to go looking for it) painted this in a slightly different light btw.

The kid didn't kill his dad because he was mad he got his Switch taken away. He got his Switch taken away, snuck into his parents room to go looking for it, found the gun instead, and started playing with it. Then he accidentally shot his dad with it.

That is a MUCH different story than "psychopathic child murders his father over a video game". But hey, anything to avoid a headline that insinuates guns themselves are the problem.

this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2026
59 points (98.4% liked)

News

34557 readers
439 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS