I'm always pro-information availability, so this sucks, I hope the repo was archived and returns and the FOSS paradigm proves resistant to harassment and the repo finds a new home.

I think the title of this thread is a tad inflammatory though, as for the quality of AI code, I mean, tbqh it's more an issue of maintainers and standards. I've seen plenty of code written by flesh and blood people they themselves couldn't explain either. Like if there was LLM code in the Linux kernel, I'd trust it no less than any other code in the Linux kernel because I trust Linus and others working on it and their eagle eyes and high standards for spotting problems and bugs, having passed the same standard I'd have absolutely zero issues with the code regardless of where it came from.

Ah, damn. Bitwarden has Agents.md. That doesn't really fill me with confidence, and it's the most critical software I use.

I need to update my threat model, I've trusted them quite a lot to the point of using Bitwarden for MFA for less-important services (so it's not really MFA, since both my password and MFA token is in Bitwarden, but it's super convenient), and only had Yubikey for my Bitwarden account, so as long as the app itself isn't compromised I should be good (and Bitwarden has a pretty good track record as far as I know), but if they are going to start vibe-coding their tools then it's probably time to move to a proper MFA.