49

House Democrats introduced legislation that if passed would force federal immigration enforcement agents to wear a public-facing identification in the form of a clearly visible and scannable QR code during enforcement actions.

The measure, H.R. 7233, was introduced last week by Rep. Ritchie Torre, a Democrat from New York, and referred to the House judiciary and homeland security committees. It currently has two cosponsors, Democratic Reps. Darren Soto and Shri Thanedar, and has taken no steps beyond initial referral.

top 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] 7112@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

Or... get this crazy idea: We can require them to remove their masks when on duty.

[-] LemmyFeed@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago

How about both eh?

[-] fizzle@quokk.au 3 points 1 week ago

Pretty much. It just seems nuts that the idea of a government security force wearing masks is not a source of constant outrage from the entire political spectrum. Accountability is a basic principle of modern government.

Even if you're a MAGA fuckwit and agree with everything ICE is doing, you should be gravely concerned that they're doing it while wearing masks.

[-] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

What, and have them feel a modicum of responsibility for their actions?

Wow, it's like you don't even appreciate the roving gangs of unaccountable state-sponsored masked murderers that Stephen Miller and Trump worked so hard to buy for you with your money.

Jesus fucking Christ just abolish ICE already you spineless, useless collaborators.

[-] phx@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

No shit. Like right now the fuckers aren't even keeping proper plates on their vehicles and are still running around masked like gangsters.

Even if they did have a QR code, what's it going to do give them a link to a hotline?

"Hello, this is the ICE complaints line, please leave your name, number, and residential address and we'll dispatch an armed goon squad to deal with your 'complaint' "

[-] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

How about a mark on the forehead instead?

Carved logo

[-] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 14 points 1 week ago

Nice idea, wrong technology.

The problem with QR codes is they're a. not human readable, and b. not instantly verifiable.

Take a QR code and a stencil, spray a few of the black modules white and white modules black, and now you have a thing that looks exactly like a QR code to any human but in reality will not scan.

A better idea would be requiring a badge number to be displayed in minimum 1" tall letters/numbers on the front of the uniform, and minimum 2" tall letters/numbers on the back of the uniform, whenever on duty.

[-] apftwb@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

I think we should allocate a few billion to ensure all officers are given "calming bananas". I think if they were to eat the calming banana before their shift, it should decrease the likelihood of them killing citizens. They are likely acting out because they are hungry. Anyway, glad we found some common ground.

[-] ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago

The fucking idiots trying to reform an agency that must be abolished. Who's gonna be getting close enough to scan their codes?

[-] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 5 points 1 week ago

Useless if the traffickers aren't unmasked, not registered with the states, keep their qualified immunity, lack body cameras that are controlled by the states, and...LIST GOES ON

It would be much easier, cheaper, and more ethical to abolish ICE outright, and then form immigration services that are attached solely to their respective states. In turn, migrants will gravitate towards working with the states that don't suck. Red states can have the delusion of their isolationist superiority, even as their economies falter and die.

[-] Ancalagon@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Oh this is sinister. They can now add malicious things to QR codes. So literally you scan it and tell on yourself to Palantir. Fuck morons.

[-] 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago

no one can force you to follow a link you scan, that is not how it works.

the problem i see in this is that when someone is shooting you in the back, it doesn't help much that he is labeled with qr code.

[-] criscodisco@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

This is why they should be disarmed, defunded, and dissolved.

They are enforcing paperwork. They need a pen, not a gun.

[-] 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

yeah. i mean step one should be banning them from wearing face mask. wtf kind of logic is that you are allowed to wear face mask and then they put qr code on you to compensate for that? they will just shoot you when you try to scan it and say they were afraid for their life.

[-] Ancalagon@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

Google and apple can, they could make it a convenience update. Lol https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/security/what-is-quishing/

I'm sure Palantir is motivated enough to find a way.

[-] 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 week ago

technique described on the link still requires you to actively open the link after you scan it.

[-] optissima@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 week ago

I have seen phones auto-open scanned links, it was one based on android.

[-] 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

that is really bad application and you can choose some other. it is really not the norm. the point is this is not some universal vector of attack.

it is stupid attempt for a solution anyway, but not for this reason.

[-] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 week ago

VPN or IP spoofing?

The problem I see is if they're too small. Maybe somebody records an agent doing something fucked up, but unless you can nab a high fidelity screenshot showing the QR code clearly, does it really matter if it's there?

It would be good to have a digital database tracking each agent, saying "so-and-so was spotted at such-and-such place doing this-and-that; here are some photos and video evidence."

Or "Here's a group of ICE thugs brutalizing a bystander. Here are the QR codes that were spotted."

But again, that all depends on people actually being able to scan the QR codes...

there were cameras like everyone, we got like 20 different angles... and they still murdered an innocent person.

training, cameras, ids.... those aren't the problem.

[-] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 week ago

It's a fine idea, but how are you supposed to approach close enough to scan the QR code if they tackle and shoot people for using cameras?

[-] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

yeah lemme just pull out my phone to scan this qr- ah fuck they already shot me, like the last guy who had his phone out

[-] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

I can think of a more recognizable square symbol to go on their forehead

[-] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 2 points 1 week ago

They moved out from "Let's give ICE 1 billion dollars for cams" since they found out that they still killing people while wearing cams.

[-] silentjohn@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

This needs a Not The Onion tag lol

[-] priapus@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago

Such a stupid idea. Just give them a normal ID you can look up, why should it be a QR code?

[-] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 2 points 1 week ago

A QR code is just that, a modern version of a code you can look up. However, I would worry that it might be hard to scan or read from a casual or safe distance if it's not large enough on their uniform.

[-] LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 week ago

Except you MUST have a phone or other recording device available to record it.

An ID number can be memorized.

[-] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago
[-] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

God damnit…

[-] AccoSpoot@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 week ago

Unless the legislation is "Abolish ICE" then it's functionally nothing at this point.

[-] kreskin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

No deals. We cant normalize this behavior in any way. Masks off and ID presented or they are presumed to be civilians.

[-] nosuchanon@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

At this point, the only reason to have meta glasses is because they always film and can automate identification without being targeted for having your phone out.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago
[-] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

Yeah, they'll just fuck with the QR codes and make them unreadable by adding in extra dots.

[-] bstix@feddit.dk 1 points 1 week ago

QR codes do have some degree of error correction.

Try it. Draw over some white spaces. It'll still scan.

[-] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

Yeah, I think it might have been Veritasium that did a video on it, but they can still be made unscannable. Ultimately, they don't wear barges as is, and their body cams seem to only work when they want them to, so what's the point. Fascism doesn't show it's face. They are going to find ways to hide no matter what.

[-] runner_g@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago

If you open any online QR code generator, you'll see a redundancy field, which is a percentage and encodes for how damaged a code can get before it's unreadable. you can set it pretty high. All that said, it'd be a hell of a lot better to abolish ICE.

this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2026
49 points (100.0% liked)

politics

28088 readers
1192 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS