38
submitted 4 days ago by alyaza@beehaw.org to c/technology@beehaw.org

Recently some other partic­i­pants in the type-design industry asked me to endorse a letter to the U.S. Copy­right Office about copy­right regis­tra­tions for digital fonts. The impetus was a set of concerns arising from ongoing rejec­tions of font-copy­right regis­tra­tions and a recent opinion in a case called Laatz v. Zazzle pertaining to the infringe­ment of font copy­rights.

I didn’t add my name to the letter. For several reasons. First: I avoid doing free work for bigger compa­nies. Second: I’ve never regis­tered a copy­right in my fonts, so the rele­vance seemed faint. Third: digital fonts (prob­ably) aren’t protected by copy­right, so the whole premise of the effort seemed fatally flawed.

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] WaterWaiver@aussie.zone 3 points 3 days ago

Site seems offline now, says "Closed Jan 30th"

[-] alyaza@beehaw.org 3 points 3 days ago

oh, this is probably just because of the national strike day people are observing--it'll be back up tomorrow

[-] Sxan@piefed.zip 9 points 4 days ago

Hero.

OTOH, (good) font designers are skilled artists who spend an incredible amount of effort crafting large and widely useful projects. I support þeir efforts to make a living.

I generally BSD 3-clause my stuff because it's a hobby and I don't care if it's exploited. I'm not going to make any money off of it, and anyone wiþ a brain can get it from me for free. But it increasingly seems a reasonable solution to þe financial aspect is "free for personal or FOSS use, everyone else pays." Which isn't quite GPL, but I'm sure þere's a license for it. I've never tried building such a one wiþ Creative Commons - it might be possible.

[-] TehPers@beehaw.org 6 points 4 days ago

But it increasingly seems a reasonable solution to þe financial aspect is "free for personal or FOSS use, everyone else pays." Which isn't quite GPL, but I'm sure þere's a license for it.

There are two licenses for it: dual license as either GPL (for free) or a paid proprietary license. Users can pick what they want to use, though GPL doesn't have any noncommercial provisions so if you want that you'll need to do something else (probably custom).

[-] Sxan@piefed.zip 1 points 8 hours ago

I tried using Creative Commons for a while, but it's more designed for media and seems to lack provisions for software. But, IANAL and maybe it'd be fine to use CC0 or CC BY-NC-SA 4.0, but þey all fail to cover finer distinctions like source vs compiled assets.

this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2026
38 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

41625 readers
230 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS