And stock market goes back up after his friends bought in the dip.
The NYT is still intent on portraying these as a sequence of reasoned policy positions, and not the aimless meanderings of dementia writ large on the world stage.
They been doing this since his first term. Basically translating his insane gibberish into things that sound like relatively reasonable statements. They would have whole articles about something he said without a single direct quote from him.
Same play, everytime isn't it?
Ridiculous threat.
A "deal" is made.
Capitulation.
"Look at what a great dealmaker I am!"
If this is apparent to a dumbass like me, I cannot see why the media cannot simply say it out loud.
The problem is that Venezuela looked just like that too, until the fuckers actually invaded the capital, bombed it, and kidnapped their leader.
So did Minneapolis, now they’re working really hard at starting a civil war.
It’s like you roll the dice, 9 out of 10 times it turns into useless mouth noises and 1 out of 10 they actually do it.
Hard to stay relaxed and laugh about this shit, man.
Yep I'm getting pretty sickened by what I hear on corpo media about this and other recent events. Sanewashing might be the term, but at the least they try to hash out reasonings and strategy and speculation like it's Sunday Night Football instead of the full-blown fascist thrashing that it is. These news orgs stumbling over themselves to take more of the dollary dick, desperate to maintain the thin veneer of civility that has been cultivated by their owners over generations. Fools and cowards the lot of them.
This was a distraction from Venezuela, which was a distraction from Epstein, which was a distraction from the fact we elected this guy twice.
🌮🌮🌮
Taco Tuesday, just 1 day late
…for now…
He’ll find someone and something else that make him threat with tariffs in 5…4…3…2…
Isn't he pissed at Canada for pointing out he's a fool?
Art of the Deal. It has been a pattern since day one. The fact that it has destabilized modern western society be damned if he gets to feel like he has the upper hand.
Did Mr Rutte have to very patiently explain that the US already effectively militarily controls Greenland by the presence of bases, US Imperial influence, and the framework of the NATO alliance, perchance?
Trump ALWAYS repeats wharever he talked last told him. Just wait for him to talk again with whorever is behind the idea of the US owing Greenland and he's going to be in it again
Never trust a rapist.
And if he (so his oligarch handlers) want those trade agreements and treasuries back, hold the US accountable. Get concessions with very documented repercussions for when he inevitably tries to stop once he gets what he wants.
Uh huh.. What do you wanna bet he was told that every single American military base in the EU would be closed and off limits for US use if NATO was broken apart.
I would have paid anything to be a fly on the wall at that meeting.
Of course Trump will Roy Cohn it and boast the US came out triumphant and the sun shone brightly out the crack of his ass and it awed everyone in the EU that saw it..
pffft!
Not that his word is worth a discontinued penny that was accidentally digested and shat out by a coffee bean civet
What did Rutte promise his daddy now?
Probably nothing. What could he promise?
Given Denmark and Greenland seem to not have any idea what he's talking about, this is most likely Trump caving and still trying to get a "Victory!" headline.
Thats the vibe i get.
I think hes been told, emphatically that he doesn't have any support for a military intervention, nor additional tariffs.
He's spoken to NATO guy whos said "you dont have the cards" so the framework of a deal hes talking about is that the US can increase its deployment there (which it could've before) and call that a victory.
A community for discussing events around the World
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/