156
submitted 13 hours ago by ooli3@sopuli.xyz to c/science@beehaw.org
all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] jcorvera@quokk.au 1 points 15 minutes ago

I mean, Monty at Xiph.org is on file for stating that Hi-Res music is snake oil.

FLAC is great for critical listening and Jukebox mode. Otherwise, a decent Opus file on a modern DAP works fine.

[-] masterspace@lemmy.ca 17 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

The article is interesting, and I would not spend the crazy amounts that some people do on cables, but cable quality does still matter.

First of all, the article says that one area it definitely does make a difference is:

Interference-prone environments: Poorly shielded cables can pick up interference, affecting signal quality. However, these tests show a broader point. Detecting audible differences is surprisingly difficult when visual cues, price, and expectation are removed. Without context or labels, even ridiculous conductors fail to produce reliably noticeable changes.

However, the tests arent testing for interference at all. They're performed openly on a desk without much around, but it then goes on to conclude:

If wet mud and bananas don’t degrade the signal in ways listeners can detect, then subtle improvements from expensive cables are even less likely to be audible. In other words, the threshold for hearing real differences is far higher than marketing often implies.

Like yes, there is obviously marketing hype, especially if buying a name brand cable, but the quality of shielding legitimately can make a difference, especially if you're running it alongside power cables / extension cords.

The other factor that can make a difference, has nothing to do with audio quality but just physical convenience, in that pure Copper cables will be more expensive, but thinner and more flexible, then Copper Clad Aluminum (CCA). CCA is cheaper, and if your runs are static and unmoving there's zero issue with it, but if you're moving your speakers around a bunch, the stiffness compared to copper can be annoying.

[-] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 6 hours ago

CCA cables break if they are moved a lot. I've had trouble with CCA ethernet cables breaking.

[-] Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de 54 points 12 hours ago
[-] scytale@piefed.zip 29 points 11 hours ago

Audiophiles when they can’t tell the difference between lossless and 320kbps mp3:

[-] dumnezero@piefed.social 11 points 9 hours ago

me listening to music I encoded at ~90 kbps opus

[-] RedGreenBlue@lemmy.zip 12 points 9 hours ago

Over the years my relative has spent allot of money on these non balanced audio cables. Every time he 'upgrades' he says it sounds so much better. I hear no difference. Then he puts the volume up so my ears hurt and asks if i can hear it. I just smile at that point.

[-] Lembot_0006@programming.dev 41 points 13 hours ago

Because all those materials are shit. Only deoxydised copper with gold coating will be ok, more or less! Barbarians!

[-] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 1 points 2 hours ago

Not unless you’ve had a swami bless it, or you may as well not have bothered.

[-] sefra1@lemmy.zip 7 points 9 hours ago

And optical cables need to be gold plated. Basic audiophile knowledge.

[-] spit_evil_olive_tips@beehaw.org 7 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

make sure your optical cables are properly magnetized / demagnetized, too

if the cables are running in a north/south direction you want them magnetized with oblong polarity to the Earth's magnetic field, but if they're east/west they shouldn't be magnetized at all to avoid Maxwell-Gauss feedback loops

[-] rockerface@lemmy.cafe 24 points 12 hours ago

I only use gold plated banana entwined with meteorite iron, thank you very much. Everything else is just a waste of sound.

[-] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 12 hours ago

Nonono, only literal pure gold will ever transmit sound acceptably. If your cables are light enough to still be picked up by humans, they dont contain enough gold.

[-] adb@lemmy.ml 3 points 12 hours ago

I’m pretty certain most will unironically say this. Or hold this up as proof that you shouldn’t use a consumer level interface because you can’t even distinguish mud from banana.

[-] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 30 points 12 hours ago

Are we making banana phone happen?

[-] its_me_xiphos@beehaw.org 22 points 12 hours ago

What could it cost, ten dollars?

[-] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 15 points 12 hours ago

Ring ring ring ring ring……

[-] luciole@beehaw.org 13 points 13 hours ago

Wait Can I be the conductor? Wireless is cool but Bluetooth is kinda iffy.

[-] brsrklf@jlai.lu 12 points 10 hours ago

Depends. Are you a banana?

[-] luciole@beehaw.org 7 points 10 hours ago
[-] B0rax@feddit.org 4 points 9 hours ago

Then you can be a battery

[-] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 3 points 9 hours ago
[-] brsrklf@jlai.lu 1 points 8 hours ago

Fun fact, the French version of this line translates to "I am a clothes moth wearing a sweater". It's kind of a classic too.

[-] adb@lemmy.ml 7 points 10 hours ago

Anything can be a conductor if the signal is strong enough

this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2026
156 points (99.4% liked)

Science

15231 readers
242 users here now

Studies, research findings, and interesting tidbits from the ever-expanding scientific world.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS