33

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/59455315

Former Minnesota Governor Jesse Ventura says the people of his state should consider leaving the United States. In an interview on the SpinSisters podcast that premiered Saturday, Ventura pitched his plan by saying that it’s clear President Donald Trump doesn’t want the state.

“How about since Trump dislikes Minnesota so bad and we’re so out of control, let’s join Canada. Instead of Canada becoming the 51st state of America and lose their healthcare.... I’d like to see Minnesota, all of us become Canadians,” Ventura said. Make this part of Canada, because it’s obvious Donald Trump don’t want us. It’s obviously he’s ready to fracture the whole country for his own folly."

all 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FaceDeer@fedia.io 11 points 1 month ago

We don't want it. Minnesota voted 47% for Trump, and the Democrats are a right-wing party too from Canadian perspective, a massive block of far-right voters like this joining Canada would be devastating.

Americans need to sort their own shit out, not come crawling to Canada to do it for them. We've got our own issues to deal with.

[-] MyMindIsLikeAnOcean@piefed.world 5 points 1 month ago

The whole thing is silliness to make a point…like Alberta separation. But…

…I wouldn’t be so sure with this positioning of Minnesotans, or any Americans, so far right of Canada. The American system has been gerrymandered and moved away from democracy in various ways…to the point where the actual people might be more aligned with Canada than you believe.

The only hardcore sticking point, in my estimation, would be guns. It would be a non-starter for too many on both sides.

[-] FaceDeer@fedia.io 0 points 1 month ago

That 47%-for-Trump figure cannot be explained by gerrymandering, it's a state-wide figure.

Frankly, I'm trying to make a point here too. I'm pointing out how even when Americans are supposedly being "nice" they're often still grounding their niceness in unspoken assumptions of American exceptionalism. A bit of America going "we'll just go join Canada and surely Canada will want to have us" has the same underlying feeling that obviously everyone would like to be American and join America if they could.

[-] MyMindIsLikeAnOcean@piefed.world 1 points 1 month ago

Sure it can…Minnesota and US-wide. Even though voter turnout in that state is relatively high…the last federal election saw higher than average Republican turnout and lower than average Democrat turnout.

Furthermore, voting intentions for Trump have fallen dramatically in Minnesota for obvious reasons…while voting against him has seen almost the same rise.

Additionally, voting for Trump isn’t the same as being conservative…there’s are very large cohorts of people who were for example: low information/previously apolitical, the Trump left, and independents and libertarians…it was a motley coalition.

I’d put actual hard conservative support in Minnesota in the 30-35% range. There are far too many people who would benefit from cheaper and higher quality healthcare and education immediately to maintain a number anywhere near 47%.

It’s not a secret that Republicans and conservatives in general can win elections with these low numbers…and round we go.

[-] adespoton@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 month ago

The point made above though is that anyone voting Democrat is extremely conservative by Canadian politics too; how many Minnesotans are currently willing to vote independent?

[-] MyMindIsLikeAnOcean@piefed.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I think the reason that Democrats are in trouble is because they don’t represent their voters. There’s a chasm between policy and opinion. That, and they need to win elections by at least 3 and up to 10 points because of how corrupt the US “Democracy” is.

I’m Canadian and I’ve spent some time down in the US…I don’t consider myself to have radically different views…even from many American conservatives…except on a couple wedge issues. The problem, as I see it, isn’t that we’re different…it’s that there are people paying big bucks to convince us that we are.

[-] Soup@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

The fact you don’t at all hnderstand why we wouldn’t want you, aren’t understanding what this person is saying, and seem to want to tell us what the problem is despite us laying out why we don’t like you in very clear language is exactly the kind of bullshit that makes us want to stay far, far away from that garbage.

The US sucks, and even at its best it’s nowhere near even the mediocrity that is Canada. We do not need to tip the scales even further right, we do not need to throw gasoline on the fire.

[-] MyMindIsLikeAnOcean@piefed.world 1 points 1 month ago

You didn’t engage with anything I wrote and just ranted about what you wanted to reply to.

I’m Canadian…and I stayed no opinions in my reply, just the lay of the land as I see it. I agree that the US sucks, agree that Canada is mediocre and getting worse, and I absolutely do not want Americans joining us…especially the gun nuts, fundamentalists etc.

All I was saying is that we’re a lot closer to each other than all this hyperbole and combative rhetoric would have us believe…Minnesota and isn’t some monolith of conservative boogeymen…they’re mostly nice and reasonable people, and there’s many who would appreciate what makes us better than them.

[-] Soup@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

You really think the only sticking point is guns? Seriously? I mean, us Canadians are largely politically quite ignorant and most of our knowledge is vibes-based parroting of things our parents said when we were children so fuck it, sure, whatever, dude. And hey, we’re already dumb enough that we see the US and still vote nearly half for PP so there’s that. Maybe MAGA actually would be welcome.

[-] chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago

Jesse "The body" Ventura may be my favorite Alex Jones guest (in that he actually tells Jones that a bunch of his ideas don't work in actual governance and gave some surprisingly reasonable takes) but I'm still not sure he's a reasonable person to quote. Also on the competition for favorite guest, Alex Jones once accidentally got a really sweet Astronaut to call in who really just wanted to talk about how awesome space and science were, and wouldn't go down any conspiracy rabbit holes. He didn't actually know who Jones was but wanted to spread a lovely message. Had a cut message from his daughter or granddaughter too (it was oddly unclear).

[-] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 2 points 1 month ago

Look, this was already settled already. How about instead of running from the problems our country is facing we, like idk, actually deal with them. Secession is a chickenshit non-answer.

[-] ChillPenguin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I think of secession as a catalyst more than anything. That's how a civil war starts. The US wouldn't allow it.

I think Minnesota even bringing it up would mean a lot. Why do I have to pay federal taxes for the federal government to occupy our cities.

[-] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 0 points 1 month ago

In the US it can be no more than a masturbatory thought experiment. As I said, that was settled, and you know it was bad enough when southern republicans would talk like that with their whole "The South Will Rise Again". No the fuck it won't, but boy will it, and the Republican party in general, let the oldest trick in the CIA handbook for regime change work on them. They fell for a ringer.

Falling to republican talking points and empty threats is a waste of energy that could otherwise be used to do actual good.

[-] cmbabul@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

You might be the most delusional person I’ve read an opinion from on here if you think another civil war and dissolution of the union isn’t possible or even likely this point in time.

Just because “it was settled” in the first civil war doesn’t mean it’s settled now and forever, thats not how anything works at all.

Don’t bother responding I don’t have time for the naive so you’re blocked

[-] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today -1 points 1 month ago

Uh huh.👍✌️

[-] ChillPenguin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Sounds like what the British thought before the revolutionary war. When the government stops giving a shit about laws and the constitution. There is going to be a breaking point. In Minnesota we have been following the rules, staying peaceful, yet they have not turned down the occupation.

But eventually that will run out. "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable" -JFK

Empires come and go with time. Look at any point in history.

[-] MyMindIsLikeAnOcean@piefed.world 0 points 1 month ago

I mean…it’s Jesse Ventura…but it’s hyperbole to make a point, I’d imagine.

[-] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 1 points 1 month ago

You know I ignored his name entirely. The suggestion makes more sense now.

[-] leadore@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Reading the comments, and disregarding that Ventura was just making a point and not seriously suggesting secession, it seems that people are assuming that Minnesota would simply join Canada as a single unit with the current population as it is.

Obviously that's not what would happen. Canada wouldn't be getting a 47%-magat population in the deal. First, those people wouldn't want to secede or go to Canada. They would move to another state before they'd let that happen. Second, Canada wouldn't just let anyone in just because they were from Minnesota. They'd screen them and decide who to let in. Plus there would be USians from other states trying to move to Minnesota to get in on it. It would be chaotic and messy. Who knows how or if they'd even be able to make it work.

A more likely scenario would be some states seceding, a civil war and major population redistribution, then in the aftermath depending on if the seceding states won independence, maybe a deal with some of them would be made to be annexed by Canada. Or maybe negotiations with certain states would take place during the war regarding future annexation, and Canada might even help them in the war. Who knows.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Unfortunately USA is not a free country, and secession is illegal.
History shows that military force will be used in case states try to secede.

[-] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

It's very easy for secession to be legal. You just have to have the federal government on board with it. Someone could absolutely run for president on a platform of, "I'll let states secede from the union. If you want to go, I won't stop you." What SCOTUS says is irrelevant. If the president simply refused to send in the military to suppress any rebellion, secession would be fully legal.

[-] whereIsTamara@lemmy.org 0 points 1 month ago

Lmfao, goodbye Alberta, hello Minnesota, Washington, Oregon, California…

[-] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Canada could do the first three. California wouldn't work though. California and Canada have populations that are about equal. It wouldn't be California joining Canada, it would be California and Canada merging to form one new country. MN, WA, and OR could join Canada without completely upending the demographics of the country. But if all of these states joined, and Alberta left, a comfortable majority of Canada's entire population would be citizens of former US states. That's just the US annexing Canada by another name.

[-] Tugboater203@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

I do enjoy the idea, but I feel we have to call it out just like we do every time Texas talks about leaving. This issue has been settled (violently).

If you get a majority of the northern population centers and economies to seceed it would be more feasible, but it would result in an actual shooting civil war. One state (with the exception of California) isn't enough to go it alone.

[-] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

This issue has been settled (violently).

It hasn't been settled at all. All it would take for secession to be legal and an available option would be for someone to get elected president on a platform of "I'll let states secede." That's literally all it would take. If the person commanding the military just refuses to use it to put down a secession, secession will happen.

[-] faraiwe@mstdn.social 0 points 1 month ago

@Sine_Fine_Belli I mean, Mn is already colder than anything reasonably habitable... at this point, why not?

#TurdReich #Minnesota #Canada #USPol

[-] Quilotoa@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago

Remember, when the northern part of Minnesota ends, the southern part of Canada begins and Canada is the world's prefered choice for immigration. Other things are more important than climate.

[-] alsimoneau@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

To be fair, the whole state is further north than Toronto.

this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2026
33 points (97.1% liked)

politics

28951 readers
434 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS