127

Sylvestre Ledru who serves as the lead developer of the uutils project for the Rust Coreutils implementation presented at FOSDEM 2026 this weekend on this initiative. Ledru has spoken at FOSDEM in prior years on Rust Coreutils and this year's talk focused primarily on Ubuntu 25.10's adoption of it in place of GNU Coreutils.

Ledru's presentation covered the progress made on Rust Coreutils in recent times and Ubuntu 25.10's uptake of Rust Coreutils and continuing that for Ubuntu 26.04 LTS. While some bugs have been found as a result of it, they have been fixed rather quickly. Ledru's presentation also points out some of the popular trolling around Rust Coreutils and ultimately how many of those commenters have been proven wrong

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 58 points 1 week ago

Lol, very first pair of comments. I love phoronix sometimes.

[-] PabloSexcrowbar@piefed.social 16 points 1 week ago

Ah, the duality of man...

[-] Melusine@tarte.nuage-libre.fr 14 points 1 week ago

Volta raging over any rust post, a classic XD

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 45 points 1 week ago

Replace a perfectly usable GPL software for MIT? Nope. I used to fall for that ten years ago. The social infrastructure of software is more important than the exact tech used. The license is fundamental to that.

load more comments (16 replies)
[-] somerandomperson@lemmy.dbzer0.com 43 points 1 week ago

it still has a permissive license :(

[-] OfCourseNot@fedia.io 20 points 1 week ago

You are very right. While non-copyleft licences makes sense for some software (a game engine like Godot, for example, released under the MIT licence) it's absolutely awful for the coreutils.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] AllzeitBereit@feddit.uk 6 points 1 week ago

What's wrong with a permissive licence?

[-] Sivecano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 44 points 1 week ago

GPL or GTFO! On a more serious note: Permissive licenses open a project up to unilateral exploitation by commercial entities and can lead to fractured ecosystems.

On a more principled note: permissive licenses (as compared to free software licenses) undermine the free software ecosystem and the freedoms it brings in the long term and the thing that uutils is doing - that is taking a GPL licensed project and rewriting it under a more permissive license is corrosive to free software. GPL applies not when corporations use a piece of software, but when they distribute binaries back to you. This is not about limiting the rights of corporations but about protecting the digital freedom of people.

[-] duelistsage@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago

It allows corporations to take without giving back.

It's why Sony and Apple based their operating systems on BSD over Linux.

load more comments (20 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[-] somegeek@programming.dev 25 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

We like the Rust, we hate the cuck license. Simple.

[-] onlinepersona@programming.dev 4 points 1 week ago

I don't understand what's going on with the rust community insisting on cuck licences. Do they love writing on their Mac books so much?

[-] somegeek@programming.dev 5 points 1 week ago

I think a part of it may be that they are from the younger generation like myself, and most of them don't really know the history of software and FOSS, and MIT is just a safe option for them. I think they haven't really put in the time to read and undertstand the philosophy and logic behind FOSS and read the licenses and writings.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[-] mesamunefire@piefed.social 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It is trolling when it broke production level systems?

To be fair im NOT blaming the rust util team. I hope the best for them. But it was a bad decision to use something like that to power systems before it was fully tested and ready. It broke many different things in prod at work and we had to switch over to another distro entirely. Which was a lot of work. It made us stop using Ubuntu which is a shame.

[-] Maestro@fedia.io 13 points 1 week ago

Your first mistake was using Ubuntu on a production server. Canonical has made more than enough questionable decisions over the past decade that using Ubuntu for a production system should be a red flag.

[-] mesamunefire@piefed.social 4 points 1 week ago

Your probably right. It was an old setup but ill own it. I inherited it (mitus touch) so I probably should have put more effort into switching.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] bitcrafter@programming.dev 8 points 1 week ago

It is trolling when it broke production level systems?

Depends. Were they the ones who put it into production level systems? If the answer to that question is no, then, well, you have your answer already.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 13 points 1 week ago

If they could just use a real licence and even more copyleft (at least something, like EUPL, MPL or GPLv2)

[-] mesamunefire@piefed.social 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The licence would be significantly better. And would drive a bit more adoption.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] duelistsage@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago

Going from GPL to a weaker license was a terrible idea and whoever supported it should be held accountable.

load more comments (1 replies)

Rust Coreutils Continues Working Toward 100% GNU Compatibility, Proving Trolls Wrong

98 comments

Phoronix, you are the trolls.

[-] WILSOOON@programming.dev 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Lol, phoronix forums being on point

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2026
127 points (92.6% liked)

Linux

12255 readers
412 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS