It allows corporations to take without giving back.

It's why Sony and Apple based their operating systems on BSD over Linux.

They never should've gone with a weak license to begin with.

Whoever is suggesting and perpetuating MIT over GPL needs to be tarred and feathered.

So let them do that. Why should we be doing their dirty work for them?

Unless we're stupid.

Businesses can already create their own forks of GPL-licensed software and not contribute their changes to the upstream project

No they can't, at least not legally. Part of using GPL software is that you need to include the GPL with any changes you make.

It's the entire point of the license and the concept behind copyleft.

Going from GPL to a weaker license was a terrible idea and whoever supported it should be held accountable.

The rebellion can only succeed with decentralized activity.

It's because he's a minority and has to look "super serious" in front of the white guys to feel like he belongs.

Very important.

At this stage, I see no reason to use anything other than KDE.