15
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Tehbaz@lemmy.wtf 5 points 1 week ago

Now get rid of advertising on smart TV OSes

[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

just get rid of Smart TVs in general. Go back to simple dumb TVs.

If I want smart features, I can slap a Roku or something else on the TV.

[-] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

I had to go out of my way to find a dumb HD TV years ago. I don't know if they even exist any more.

[-] TwinTitans@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Do not connect your tv to WiFi.

[-] Zoldyck@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

8k is such a waste. Most content people watch isn't even 4k

[-] thehatfox@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

For a lot of people most of their content isn’t even 1080p. Plenty of people watching DVDs and many TV channels only broadcast in SD.

Display technology has long outpaced content delivery.

[-] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I still watch most streaming like YouTube and twitch on 720p because I really don't see nor care about the difference to 1080p.

[-] iLStrix@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

It's crazy how different people experience things. I find it annoying and less pleasant to watch YouTube at 1080p since they downgraded the bitrate and locked it behind premium. I actually almost always watch at 4k or 1440p60 even on a phone screen just because of the bitrate.

[-] DaGeek247@fedia.io 1 points 1 week ago

It really is always crazy to see the different perspectives. I've actually unsubscribed from a channel for the bad quality youtube put on all their 1080p videos. I'm also still eagerly awaiting the slomo guys bluray release of their greatest hits.

[-] khannie@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yeah, surprisingly DVD is still heavily outselling 4K bluray. Seems weird to me but I guess the players are ubiquitous.

[-] DaGeek247@fedia.io 4 points 1 week ago

New blurays are 30-50 each. New DVDs are 5 or less, each. Libraries usually have bigger dvd collections than bluray collections. People use what they can afford, not what is best.

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

Also there's nearly 30 years worth of DVD content available, it's basically for the same reason why VHS still has a present following.

[-] DaGeek247@fedia.io 2 points 1 week ago

Well, that, and vhs is one of those things that is fun to play with. It's never going to be perfect, and that's enough to keep people like me coming back to see what new improvements I can make to my vhs setup this time.

[-] b34k@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Amazon has 3 for $33 sales a couple times a year. I just got Wicked (2024), F1 and Sinners in 4k for $11 each.

[-] b34k@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

When 4K players cost $500 to get something considered “good but not great”… yeah no wonder no ones buying

[-] khannie@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That is not what they cost. Mine was 180 euro. It has HDR support and plays everything I throw at it.

[-] b34k@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

HDR, or Dolby Vision? From my research, anything less than the Panasonic UB820 either has missing features, or longevity issues.

Even still, 180 euro is well above the under $40 you can lots of DVD and even Standard Blu Ray

Personally, I grabbed a MakeMKV compatible UHD optical drive from eBay for $150, and just remux my discs to Plex… and then use CoreELEC on the Ugoos AM6B+ to ensure proper Dolby Vision and Lossless Audio support…. but I know that’s not exactly a mainstream option.

[-] SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

Not on desktop use. Which is a market segment that is under served.

Would love to replace my 4x 1440p monitor setup with a 50 inch 8k TV setup.

[-] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 week ago

That would be nice for CAD work, but it would have to be an actual PC monitor, not a TV. 42 inch would be just about right for my desk. The only ones I've seen are 32 inch, which is too small to replace four monitors.

[-] SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I think 50 inch is about the upper end for what can fit on a desk, but a 42 inch is the upper limit for most. I used to have a 42inch 4k monitor ($400), but it broke and got discontinued. It was basically a 42inch IPS TV display.

I still miss that display.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] heiligerbimbam@lemmy.wtf 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

8k is pointless. I even rarely use 4k on my 65".

[-] djdarren@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago

My 55" 4K OLED LG is the single greatest TV panel I've ever looked at. I can't determine any individual pixels, the blacks are black. I have no issues with it in the slightest. And I see absolutely no reason why any TV of that size should need 4x more pixel density (or whatever it is).

[-] kameecoding@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Not sure what the manufacturers were thinking, this chart has existed for a long time, you have to be sitting pretty close or looking at a rather large screen for 8K to make sense

[-] Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 week ago

Where would 1440p lie on this?

[-] olympicyes@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

1440p screens are all monitors you sit 2-4’ from. That close you can justify a higher resolution but people pick 1440p for other reasons like frame rate.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] assembly@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I’ve never seen an 8k TV but ignorance is bliss as I’m still rocking 1080 and happy. I do see the difference at 4k when at friends houses but 1080 still looks good in my living room.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

2k is nice. 4k is pushing the limit of utility, even if you can get content for it (or play games with that resolution if gaming). 8k is beyond any need for any normal person. Maybe if you have a private movie studio you could use it, but I don't think that's what this is discussing.

[-] hornedfiend@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago

2k is the best. For pc games it's thr gold standard for me. I can hardly see the difference from between 2k and 4k and my GPU is grateful.

[-] Prox@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

4k's bump in resolution is nice, but the biggest benefit is the improvement in color (HDR or Dolby Vision).

[-] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

They might look better but they're too fucking expensive

[-] olympicyes@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Even if they were priced the same as 4K they would still be a bad value. Computers and consoles struggle with 4K 120Hz so 4 times the resolution is too much to ask.

[-] rogsson@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago

The majority of ppl watching a streaming service with shitty res and crappy compression would do fine on 1080p

[-] joelfromaus@aussie.zone 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I agree. My Plex server is majority 720p with decent bitrate with a lot of 1080p with decent bitrate and a tiny amount of 4K with subpar bitrate (otherwise it’s too large). The 720p is noticeable on the big screen but good luck spotting between 1080p and 4K. It might be different with full 4K Blueray rips but I’m not using 50-80Gb per movie.

[-] jacksilver@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I've downloaded some 4k content to do side-by-side with 1080p and it's a struggle to notice the difference.

[-] 6nk06@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

Obviously they should have worked on upgrading our eyes before doing that /s

[-] arin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

actually true, there are people with above 20/20 vision and 8k tv would be like us going from 1080p to 4k to them. We should upgrade everyone's vision to beyond 20/20 that would be a net benefit for everyone! Then we can all enjoy 8k tv. But honestly as a glasses wearer, the main benefit of 8k tvs are that you can go up to the tv to see way more details. It's quite amazing and underrated, if you do the same to a same size 4k tv you can notice the pixels like a 1080p tv.

[-] Deceptichum@quokk.au 1 points 1 week ago

Imagine what you could see with as 16K TV.

[-] demonsword@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

why stop there, let's go 640k TV, that ought to be enough for anyone

load more comments (1 replies)

The only market for 8k is movie theaters and megatrons. It’s absolutely not necessary to have it in your tv in your house. And it’s also insanely expensive to get the proper hardware to drive it at full resolution.

[-] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

Most cinemas are 2k as well I think

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Even there it's wasted. There is just no place between pixel density, size and distance for anythng much over 4k. Humans can only see that sharp. Except maybe video walls, where you don't see the whole image at once.

That’s what I meant re: megatrons (the giant video replay screens they have in a lot of big sports arenas)

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] OldQWERTYbastard@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I bought my 1080p LED backlit 60" Vizio panel back in early 2015 and it's still going strong!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2026
15 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

81114 readers
569 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS