61

A rising number of American homeowners are ready relocate this year due to extreme weather events and other climate-related concerns.

Some 49 percent of those who own a house are considering moving in 2026 due to climate events, according to a survey of 1,000 American adults by insurance provider Kin Insurance. Also a concern among homeowners is the rising cost of homeownership, the study noted.

“Kin uncovered that climate is driving decisions about where people live and the rising costs of homeownership are changing when and how people buy homes,” the study noted. The study also found that nearly all homeowners are concerned about severe weather damaging their homes.

Kin’s survey found that within the 49 percent of homeowners who want to move, 19 percent “definitely” are considering it, while 30 percent are “somewhat” considering it. Some 45 percent said they were not considering a move.

As for how far away they want to move, Kin broke up respondents’ intentions into three groups:

  • Moving within their current city or community: 41 percent
  • Moving to a different city or community in their state: 35 percent
  • Moving to another state: 25 percent.

For those considering a move to another state, more than half of respondents wanted to avoid disaster-prone states like Florida and California and preferred to move to what they perceived as low-risk states, including Vermont, New Hampshire, Delaware, and Connecticut.

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] pedz@lemmy.ca 3 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

But they're gonna continue to consoom and drive their individual giant SUVs everywhere. Don't worry they will be electric so buy buy buy.

Anyway, AI running in datacenters powered by fossil fuel will surely find a technological solution to our consumption problems.

Surely we can't just stop consooming.

And don't forget to recycle!

[-] pageflight@piefed.social 9 points 1 day ago

I wonder how many of those people are significantly reducing their carbon footprint & voting for environmental policies. It's going to be a lot easier for everyone to find not-disaster-prone locations to move to if we reduce the trajectory towards apocalypse even a little.

[-] notsosure@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago

It’s intriguing to an outsider that climate denial appears to be so prominent in the USA, whereas the average US American reacts directly to the threat. It would be refreshing if this fear would for once precipitate in the elections.

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 3 points 15 hours ago

Nope. Climate change is incremental and people will just habituate to the new normal. 90% of Florida oranges are gone due to disease, they will just forget about oranges.

[-] relianceschool@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 day ago

If you look at what Republican leadership is doing (not saying), they absolutely believe climate change is a threat. They're reacting to it with dystopian measures, but it's clear they're just playing dumb.

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 day ago

In many US regions, home insurance is no longer an option, or so expensive people are raw dogging it.

[-] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 day ago

Nearly half of homeowners want to relocate

but find it hard because the real estate 'industry' has their hand out. Say goodbye to a significant percentage of value due to middlemen like Kin, coincidentally why you're seeing this.

[-] calliope@piefed.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 day ago

According to Wikipedia, Kin

provides home insurance in Florida, Alabama, Arizona, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Virginia

[-] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

Sounds like the areas voting for things to get worse...

[-] orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts 3 points 1 day ago

Kin is good. I know people that work and have worked there. Florida is very limited on options, so it’s nice to have more safety nets.

[-] calliope@piefed.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 day ago

They certainly seem like the people to know who is wanting to move somewhere with less climate chaos!

this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2026
61 points (100.0% liked)

Climate

8256 readers
244 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS