124
submitted 4 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Threat of stationing immigration agents around voting locations has become a concern as it can be a deterrent to legal residents of color who are concerned they may be harassed by federal agents

The White House refused to rule out following through on the threat of Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents being sent out to “surround the polls” when voters cast ballots in this November’s midterm elections as a way of depressing Democratic turnout and boosting chances of Republican victories in the House of Representatives and Senate.

Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt on Thursday said she could offer “no guarantee” that ICE personnel would not be stationed at polling sites when Americans are in the process of choosing whether to extend the Republican stranglehold on power at both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue.

She had been asked about former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon’s recent call for Trump to deploy ICE around election sites on his War Room podcast on Tuesday, just days after Trump himself called for a Republican “takeover” of vote-counting in Democratic-led states and municipalities.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 34 points 4 months ago

Democratic leadership is sleepwalking us into a permanent state of authoritarian rule.

[-] French75@slrpnk.net 7 points 4 months ago

That's not fair. They are still working super hard to disarm the people in blue states.

[-] varnia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 4 months ago

I think it's open jealousy about how you can get away with practically anything from undermining constitutional amendments to profit personally - all without seemingly being held accountable.

[-] daannii@lemmy.world 32 points 4 months ago

When Obama ran, local organizations rented vans and escorted people to and from polls.

We can do it again if needed.

[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Alright fuck it I'll be the one to take the blame. If any federal agent steps into a voting zone for your state they are illegally manipulating voting as they have no rights to be there. If you see a federal agent heckling or trying to sway people trying to vote, it is a matter of national security and you should be covered by your civic duties to shoot and kill the theat to your country. Period.

The law strictly states that the federal government has no jurisdiction at a poll, it is state run. If one shows up it is an attack on your states rights, and interferening with your election, thus defined as an insurrection attempt. Every member involved should be tried for treason, punishable by death, or life in prison. (Maybe less, but let them find out)

Edit: also if you think this is a threat, let me carry a gun into the voting house of every Republican and submit their ballot for them. If that sounds "threatening" that's exactly what he suggested

[-] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

The very act of floating this idea is election fraud. Even if they don't do it, threatening to do it could discourage voters.

[-] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

We can offer no guarantee that democrat voters won't be harmed, detained or even murdered while voting.

[-] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Arghblarg@lemmy.ca 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Let everyone you know that mail-in ballots are still an option... but educate them that they must bring the ballot to the post office IN PERSON, and ask the postal staff to post-mark it IN FRONT OF THEM. I have read (please correct me if I'm wrong!) that works around the recent regulation change that allows dropped-off post to be stamped when it's delivered, instead of when it's first dropped off, which is a rat-fucking tactic to increase the likelihood of ballots being marked late, knowing they'll probably take many days from drop-off to delivery.

[-] Formfiller@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Well I guess we’re going to be exercising our second amendment rights because that’s tyranny.

[-] Doomsider@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

Can you imagine getting abducted when you try to vote? Now you don't have to!

I am sure this will help the voter turnout and is definitely not a thinly veiled threat meant to cause voter suppression.

[-] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 months ago

This is dicey. If it happens, there will be a lot of problems around the polling areas. The fascists will use that as an excuse to invalidate the results.

[-] French75@slrpnk.net 4 points 4 months ago

They will have 100 different reasons to invalidate the results anyway.

[-] amikulo@slrpnk.net 4 points 4 months ago

I don't know what the conditions will be for my blue city in a red state come November. My plan is to vote early and spend election day seeking out ICE at any polling locations to film and heckle them. If they want to arrest me, my vote is already in and it will take them out of play for their role threatening voters. MN is showing us how we massively outnumber them and can stymie their tactics.

[-] BigTuffAl@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 months ago

Why is she so obsessed with getting ICE agents killed?

[-] DronePirate@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 3 months ago
[-] BigTuffAl@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Escalate how? They don't hold the flyover sovereign and they are actively losing control of territory. Their navy is spent and overspending, the national guard has its fucking jugular hanging open in every small town, and they're about to commit the army to Iran. If all they have is ICE and CPB they are going to have a very bad time.

[-] Biffsbraincell@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 months ago

Republicans have stolen every presidential election they've won since 2000. There haven't been consequences yet, and the future won't be any different unless we stand up.

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

They tried damn hard to steal the ones they lost as well, and know that because of the last year they may not get voted for, for another couple decades. They know they can't win, so they are abandoning democracy.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] BeautifulMind@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Thats not a warning intended to keep the public safe, it's a threat intended to get the public to give up on democracy

[-] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 months ago

How the fuck did we get to a point where it's normal for the government to say these things?

[-] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 months ago
[-] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Conservatives stopped respecting our Constitution and our nation as a whole.

But they're pretty good at showing up to vote, unlike many other Americans. That, combined with our electoral system being a joke and designed to allow a minority to have control, and you've got our current situation.

[-] switcheroo@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Fucking brown shirts

[-] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 months ago

Every voter come armed.

[-] Triumph@fedia.io 1 points 4 months ago

"Can't guarantee we won't continue to violate the law with impunity."

[-] Hayduke@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

We the People of the United States can.

[-] baller_w@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 months ago

Honest question: there’s not that many of them to cover a substantial number of polling stations, are there? If memory serves, there like 16k agents.

Seems like the WH is on its bullshit again.

[-] Tower@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 months ago

The threat of appearance will be enough for a not insignificant number of people. But also, they can use historical voting numbers to selectively target certain locations. No need to send anyone to the R+17 or the D+22 districts.

[-] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 1 points 4 months ago

Imagine the optics of these rabid dogs pepper spraying people in line to vote

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 1 points 3 months ago

It can't be guaranteed that an ICE jackass won't be shipped to the local junkyard.

[-] lemmy_get_my_coat@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

I'll believe it when I see it

[-] TemplaerDude@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago

Obviously.

This is obviously where it was going.

From day one, from the first lie, to the arming of his own private army, this has been the goal. Obviously.

Americans will be surprised, of course. As always.

[-] HumanOnEarth@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago

"Back when it was step 3, all the alarmists were warning me about how bad step 10 will be. Now that we're at step 7, the logical thing to do is continue to accuse people of being alarmist."

  • 9 out of 10 Americans (real Americans)
[-] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Can't guarantee I won't communicate with my community to show up to the polling stations with a large group of armed citizens to ensure we can vote safely without the interference of terrorists.

Doesn't stop them from ratfucking the votes after they're submitted, but hey, gotta do what we can.

[-] itistime@infosec.pub 1 points 3 months ago

I hear ya, but consider that will make a VERY tense situation that will likely deter voters from engaging.

[-] itistime@infosec.pub 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Gear up, the hopefools will learn too late.

Sounds like a good reason to pretend to support their bullshit and go vote against it anyway.....register independent then vote however

The declaration of party only helps metrics not the actual outcome of the vote

[-] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

If you register independent that prevents you from participating in the large party primaries in many (most/all?) states. You can only vote in the primary for your registered party. So that also locks you out of at least attempting to prevent the Democrats from incessantly fielding dumbass GOP-lite candidates like they've been doing.

Theoretically if you register as Republican that also allows you to surreptitiously torpedo their worst candidates in their primaries, but it's unlikely we'll get enough trolls on board to swing the needle meaningfully with that strategy.

[-] UncleArthur@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

Weird. I didn't realise all the American polling stations are located so near the borders with other countries.

[-] BlueEther@no.lastname.nz 0 points 4 months ago

I read somewhere that anywhere within 250 mile (I think this was the number) of an airport counts as a boarder

[-] Tower@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 months ago

100 miles.

https://www.aclu.org/know-your-rights/border-zone

This one is older, but has the great image showing just how many cities are in that 100 miles:
https://www.southernborder.org/100_mile_border_enforcement_zone

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2026
124 points (99.2% liked)

politics

29968 readers
737 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS