Linux doesn't use semantic versioning, right? So this is just an arbitrary number?
Yes.
I absolutely love semver, but it can lead to absurdly high version numbers (a package that I maintain at work is now at something like 3.1.125). It contains mostly config for other things, so... This is somewhat expected.
I still think it's better than just naming every version after the year of its release (like 2026.1) or random arbitrary numbers, though
There goes my polymarket gains, goddamnit.
What is he going to do after 19.19?
LinuxTwo 1.0 Should buy a few more decades before LinuxTwo gets to 19.19 and LinuxThree happens. Or perhaps we expand version numbers to use letters first, meaning you have 36*28 versions before 20?
Opensource
A community for discussion about open source software! Ask questions, share knowledge, share news, or post interesting stuff related to it!
⠀