2

[ sourced from TechCrunch ]

top 1 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 1 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


“The purpose of this press event is to send a very clear message about robot taxis, and say that they do not belong in the city of Los Angeles,” said Soto-Martínez.

Statewide agencies, including the DMV and Public Utilities Commission, are responsible for regulating autonomous vehicles (AVs) in California.

The motion calls for LA’s city attorney to join San Francisco’s robotaxi lawsuit against the California Public Utilities Commission.

When TechCrunch asked why the union is so focused on AVs now, Griswold said, “It’s being rolled out right now and we’re not sure that safety has been really addressed.” He added, “also, you have to go back to the human aspect of losing jobs.” That last bit explains why Teamsters is involved.

And these are all good middle-class jobs that are going to be lost.” Griswold said the union would “attack” the issue “everywhere in the United States,” including in Texas and Arizona, where robotaxi companies also operate.

Last week, two other LA Coincilmembers — Traci Park and Bob Blumenfield — backed a motion calling for more reporting on the council’s ability to regulate AVs.


The original article contains 654 words, the summary contains 183 words. Saved 72%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2023
2 points (100.0% liked)

TechNews

4086 readers
1 users here now

Aggregated tech news.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS