Came across this picture which was causing an intense amount of debate and lowkey oneupsmanship by people on the prowl to show of their expertise in all things military who were also completely out of the loop on the gear they were talking about.
You can tell they're marines by how some of their equipment is the wrong camo color.
I wasn't aware there was a wrong shade of brown, tan, or green.
They’re marines, they should obviously wear blue
/s
No /s, make the Marines ready for boarding actions again
What's wrong is combining a green bag with a desert camo outfit.
Task Force Black gives you this look:
Jim, you lazy bastard, we told you "it's in the wash" isn't an acceptable answer.
Is it normal or expected to just let the magazine drop to the ground like that?
Huh? No you've got it all wrong. This guy is mid-reload, levitating a fresh magazine up from his ankle pouch.
It's situational. If you're not in immediate danger, you'll take the time to retain the mag properly. But if you're reloading in the middle of combat, fuck that piece of plastic, let it drop. It's not worth more than your life. You can pick it up off the ground later when you're not dead.
It also depends on whether the mag is still loaded. That last round could be the one to save your life, so it's usually better to retain mags that have any amount of ammo.
But this is a staged photo, so it doesn't really matter in this case
Generally speaking you're not dropping a partially full mag under fire. You put those bullets down range, then you drop the mag for a fresh one when it's empty.
The only time you swap partials is if the shooting is over, at least temporarily. At that point everyone switches out to a fresh mag, and yes, retains the partial, because you're not doing a combat reload at that point (this is also when you check yourself and each other for injuries).
The only time you swap partials is if the shooting is over
You're forgetting another scenario: when you're behind cover.
Also, I never specified whether the person is under fire
You're forgetting another scenario: when you're behind cover.
That would fall under "When you're not in immediate danger." And again, that's not a scenario where you're going to drop the mag. You can freely retain it for later. That's what it comes down to; if you've got time to retain the mag, you retain the mag. If you're in a situation where retaining the mag would cost time you don't have, you are de facto also in a situation where you're not swapping a partial.
Also, I never specified whether the person is under fire
No, but you replied to a comment where I did.
It held there by magnets.
It's fine. Some people seemingly attempt to fling them into orbit with the Wick Flick and they still survive.
I’m honestly more concerned about the lack of hearing protection.
What?
(It was dryfire.)
Civilian: Hike around in mil surplus and dry fire because it saves money. Never see combat. Get called out for larping
Military: Hike around in mil spec kit and dry fire because it saves government money. Never see combat. Get thanked for your service
(/s)
The comment wasn't caused by the floating/flying mag? It's starting them in the face. The optic is an odd thing to focus on in this image.
It's falling. The photo was taken at the moment he released it. That's pretty common standard drill to drop the mag if you're reloading under fire. You can grab it off the ground later if you're still alive.
Look at the Marine's finger.
I really hope this isn’t AI because it looks really convincing, apart from the stock, wich looks weird and seems floating infront of the shoulder not pressed against and the iron sight still mounted on the barrel. You wouldn’t have it there if the other at the receiver is removed and es especially when it blocks the scope
A) That's your gas block, without it you have a bolt action.
B) That's what the pic riser is for.
C) yes you could replace the FSB with a modern gas block, but the barrel has been drilled for the FSB and I'd recommend changing the barrel too if you're gonna do all that, and you'd wanna swap to a free float since the FSB also is part of what retains clamshells, so might as well throw the scope on a riser and call it a day. Might even be 1/3rd co-witness actually.
I see nothing wrong with this setup, personally.
AI could never get the detail right that he's pushing the mag release and the mag is actually dropping out of the gun.
You've never seen an optic mounted on an M4 that still has the front sight block in place?
I think the laser designator being blocked by the front sight post and the heavy-ass optic only being held on by a single picatinny slot are bigger problems
It's a combination flashlight and laser aiming module. The laser and light are offset to either side of the front sight because it was specifically designed to work with that rifle.
SSTF's comment covers why the optic mount is fine. It's made like that to give proper eye relief for that optic.
It's not, and it's not.
i did, it was that all in all it gave a weird vibe and maybe i'm overexposed to AI images that i suspect them at every corner
Is that a special scope that's supposed to go on that way? It looks a bit weird being only halfway on the mount
It's on a LaRue riser which has an arm that sticks forward. The LPVO's mount is fully secured to it. In the original discussion a seemingly infinite amount of Boomers didn't know this and without doing even a second of research or thought began to confidently post about how stupid it was to mount an optic hanging halfway off a riser.
For history, here's Delta using the exact same riser:
He's put it on a riser block, presumably to get it clear of the front post, which he's chosen to leave on. Or maybe just because he finds that height more comfortable for his shooting position. He's also mounted the riser further back than the scope for some reason. Why? Who knows. Maybe that's not the scope he normally puts on there or something.
It's all just personal preference and personal quirks at the end of the day. The guy is clearly practicing reload drills, not shooting, so maybe this isn't even a proper setup. Who knows.
He's got that whole setup weirdly close. He's cramped up to use it like that.
I honestly cringe whenever people write a college dissertation in the comments trying to straighten out gun facts. One, people need to learn some brevity. Two, it seems like the topic of guns is probably one of the worst offenders for info dumps. I think it's because weapons are tied to masculinity, and showing that you know about weapons is a subconscious urge to prove your masculinity to others. Even though knowing gun facts in a vacuum isn't all that impressive nor does it actually prove that you're masculine or professional or dangerous or however you'd want to interpret it.
Hi, this is NCD. Being weirdos about military hardware is literally what we do.
I'm not saying you're wrong per se, but at the same time you somehow saw a huge sign that said "Weird Sex Pervert Convention", walked inside, looked around and yelled "Oh my God, what are all these weird sex perverts doing here?" Like, the problem here might be you.
A community for your defence shitposting needs
Rules
1. Be nice
Do not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.
2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes
If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.
3. Content must be relevant
Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.
4. No racism / hatespeech
No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.
5. No politics
We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.
6. No seriousposting
We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.
7. No classified material
Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.
8. Source artwork
If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.
9. No low-effort posts
No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.
10. Don't get us banned
No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.
11. No misinformation
NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.
Join our Matrix chatroom
Other communities you may be interested in
Banner made by u/Fertility18
