155
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by inari@piefed.zip to c/technology@lemmy.world

Google has criticized the European Union’s intentions to achieve digital sovereignty through open-source software. The company warned that Brussels’ policies aimed at reducing dependence on American tech companies could harm competitiveness. According to Google, the idea of replacing current tools with open-source programs would not contribute to economic growth.

Kent Walker, Google’s president of global affairs and chief legal officer, warned of a competitive paradox that Europe is facing. According to the Financial Times, he said that creating regulatory barriers would be harmful in a context of rapid technological advancement. His remarks came just days after the European Commission concluded a public consultation assessing the transition to open-source software.

Google’s chief legal officer clarified that he is not opposed to digital sovereignty, but recommended making use of the “best technologies in the world.” Walker suggested that American companies could collaborate with European firms to implement measures ensuring data protection. Local management or servers located in Europe to store information are among the options.

The EU is preparing a technological sovereignty package aimed at eliminating dependence on third-party software, such as Google’s. After reviewing proposals, it concluded that reliance on external suppliers for critical infrastructure entails economic risks and creates vulnerabilities. The strategy focuses not only on regulation but also on adopting open-source software to achieve digital sovereignty.

According to Google, this change would represent a problem for users. Walker argues that the market moves faster than legislation and warns that regulatory friction will only leave European consumers and businesses behind in what he calls “the most competitive technological transition we have ever seen.” As it did with the DMA and other laws, Google is playing on fear. Kent Walker suggested that this initiative would stifle innovation and deny people access to the “best digital tools.”

The promotion of open-source software aims to break dependence on foreign suppliers, especially during a period of instability caused by the Trump administration. The European Union has highlighted the risks of continuing under this system and proposes that public institutions should have full control over their own technology.

According to a study on the impact of open-source software, the European Commission found that it contributes between €65 billion and €95 billion annually to the European Union’s GDP. The executive body estimates that a 10% increase in contributions to open-source software would generate an additional €100 billion in growth for the bloc’s economy.

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] mracton@piefed.social 1 points 2 months ago

Well since Google didn’t slam Europe, it’s not that big of a deal. /lh

[-] mlg@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

I'm more surprised this isn't Microsoft lol

[-] zbyte64@awful.systems 1 points 2 months ago

MoRe OpTiOnS iS bAd FoR cOmPeTiTiOn

[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

the idea of replacing current tools with open-source programs would not contribute to economic growth.

Wrong.

creating regulatory barriers would be harmful in a context of rapid technological advancement

Wrong.

Walker suggested that American companies could collaborate with European firms

What does he not understand about digital sovereignty?

According to Google, this change would represent a problem for users

No, for Google. Also, wrong.

that the market moves faster than legislation and warns, that regulatory friction will only leave European consumers and businesses behind in what he calls “the most competitive technological transition we have ever seen.”

If that's the price to avoid technofaschism... And, again, wrong.

Tl;dr: stop wanking, Walker.

[-] HereIAm@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

I don't know if he believes his own made up BS here, but these are some really idiotic statements. I'm glad the EU is taking steps to not use infrastructure created by a fascist government. At this point I don't think there's a reason to distinguish FANG (and their friends) from the government seeing how buddy buddy they all are with each other.

[-] maturelemontree@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 months ago

This is like a "no shit Google doesn't want this" which makes moving over to the Euro style even better. Everyone opposed to what huge tech corporations are doing (should be everyone) should see this as a sign that you should make the change.

[-] firepenny@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Who will think of the shareholders? /s

[-] pkjqpg1h@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 months ago

What happened to: "Google ❤️ open source"

[-] hector@lemmy.today 1 points 2 months ago

I think it's buried the same place they put the do no evil slogan. No body no crime as they say.

[-] rumba@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 months ago

"could harm competitiveness"

Wouldn't it be funny if they took the pool of cash they were dedicating to google, but it in half then distributed the remained to the open source initiatives they were switching to?

[-] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago

I think it would increase competitiveness as well.

Google will actually have to innovate if they want to have people buy their products rather than just being the default one and only choice.

[-] Photonic@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

This is good. It means that the efforts are working and Google is getting nervous. Let them get nervous and let’s give them a lot more to be nervous about.

If nobody in Europe paid for Google products think of the economic benefit to Europe if all that saved cash was then spent by the people on European products and services.

[-] TerdFerguson@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

The leopard of consequences is hungry for tech oligarch faces.

Eat, you majestic creature. And godspeed.

[-] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 months ago

How DARE they try to ELIMINATE our Services after ALL the MONEY we Poured in Donald Trump's POCKETS!

[-] MattGade@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Fuck Google

[-] notso@feddit.org 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Drug dealer critizises addict's intention to get clean.

[-] rfr_Foglia@feddit.it 1 points 2 months ago

It means we're doing something right.

[-] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Oh no, anyways

[-] skisnow@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 months ago

Remember, whenever you see a patently weak argument like this from a trillion dollar corporation, they’re not saying it because they think anyone will believe it. They’re saying it to give the corrupt politicians in their pocket some way to pull a straight face when voting in the corporation’s favour.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] PlexSheep@infosec.pub 0 points 2 months ago

While im very happy about this just like everyone else, I think it will be a struggle to get rid of the Microslop stuff. A lot of organizations would simply cease to exist if Microslop office and their Windows admin stuff would be gone right now.

[-] skisnow@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 months ago

I don’t see how that’s true. It’s a little bit of a change to go to open source. Might need a day of training for a small percentage of particularly slow-minded staff members. Definitely nowhere near “organization is no longer viable” territory.

[-] PlexSheep@infosec.pub 0 points 2 months ago

They have no messaging, no email, no calenders, no file storage, no operating system. While the transition is definitely possible, in an abrupt event you only have maybe emergency coordinations

[-] skisnow@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago

I’m not clear on what your point is then. Your initial “it will be a struggle to get rid of” pivoted to “abrupt event”.

If you’re trying to make the case that we should all move off MS as soon as possible in order to avoid the damage of an abrupt event then yeah I’m in complete agreement.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2026
155 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

84199 readers
256 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS