KDE Responds to FUD Over Alleged systemd Mandate (linuxiac.com)

submitted 1 month ago by cm0002@toast.ooo to c/linux@programming.dev

33 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Here’s something that’s both surprising and, in a way, not surprising at all, especially after yesterday’s announcement from KaOS, a distribution long known for its deep commitment to the KDE Plasma desktop, that it plans to move away from it. The main reason cited was KDE’s reliance on systemd in a specific component.

As expected, the news quickly gained traction, prompting KDE to clarify its dependence on systemd and which parts of the desktop environment rely on it. In a post on KDE’s Reddit community titled “A quick anti-FUD FAQ to debunk ‘the KDE is forcing systemd!’ hoax“, the contributor described the claims as misinformation and provided a short FAQ clarifying the project’s position.

top 33 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] exu@feditown.com 29 points 1 month ago

The truth is nobody is building an alternative to a bunch of great API that systemd just gives you for free.

[-] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org -1 points 1 month ago

Big "Firefox should just copy everything Google Chrome does" moment.

[+] kbal@fedia.io -6 points 1 month ago

There isn't "an alternative" to systemd because nobody who hasn't drunk the kool-aid believes that anything like it should exist. The syslog, the cron daemon, the dns config, the log rotation, the ntp server, and even the init system should not all be part of one giant tangled mess of a project.

[-] Vincent@feddit.nl 19 points 1 month ago

Didn't read to me like OP was arguing for a single alternative.

[-] kbal@fedia.io 6 points 1 month ago

In that case there are alternatives for each component, most often more than one, though they may lack here and there some feature you believe to be indispensable.

[-] bestboyfriendintheworld@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 month ago

The Linux kernel is a tangled mess and not an alternative to the well designed HURD micro kernel.

[-] tux0r@snac.rosaelefanten.org 5 points 1 month ago

Both compile much slower than the entirety of Plan 9.

[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

When you compare the number of drivers in the linux and plan9 systems, it's not surprising.

[-] tux0r@snac.rosaelefanten.org 1 points 1 month ago

When it comes to drivers, the question should be "does my hardware work?", not "how many drivers for devices I will never even see in my life are there?". YMMV.

[-] kbal@fedia.io 1 points 1 month ago

Like many, back when it was fashionable I was open to the possibility of that idea being correct and I guess it's still best to keep an open mind, but the results thus far suggest otherwise. Using Hurd is somewhat difficult for most purposes. Using cron rather than systemd timers on the other hand is much more pleasant and easy.

[-] bestboyfriendintheworld@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

macOS runs on the Mach/xnu micro kernel and is pretty successful with it.

[-] kbal@fedia.io 2 points 1 month ago

Apparently there have been attempts to make a free OS based on Apple's kernel, but wikipedia mostly talks about them in the past tense. Too bad, it would've been good to have such an option.

[-] bestboyfriendintheworld@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

Pure Darwin ist still around.

I tried out a Darwin distribution a few years ago. It was a BSD with some apple flavor. None of the GUI was included, not all drivers, firmware, etc.

The community is tiny. There was also little incentive to try and fix things or add features, because upstream Apple ignored it pretty much. Grabbing the sources and compiling them into an operating system has little documentation from Apple.

Mac OS X used to install XQuartz, a hardware accelerated Xorg/X11 server by default in the 2000s, but dropped it at some point.

Even back when OpenDarwin and such were around, people would rather install YellowDog Linux that supported PowerPC Macs.

I think at some point the old NeXtStep/OpenStep folks left Apple and the new engineers didn’t understand Unix or think it’s important.

[-] onlinepersona@programming.dev 5 points 1 month ago

Then make a better alternative. You obviously "haven't drunk the koolaid".

[-] Allero@lemmy.today 1 points 1 month ago

Not every Linux user casually writes init systems. Not every Linux user is a programmer, even. Even less have competence at promoting their project so that it would be meaningfully adopted.

"Be the change you want to see" is cool and all, but Linux userbase can have opinions.

[-] onlinepersona@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago

"Write the code I want, free of charge, in your own time. I demand it. Recognition for your efforts? Nah, I won't even know of you, but if anything ever goes wrong, I will find your repo and complain about how Microslop did it better with hundreds of engineers!"

That's what you sound like. If you don't contribute code, money, documentation, detailed bug reports, community guidance, moderating, etc., then IMO, that opinion is worthless.

Devs aren't your code monkeys, shackled to computers to do your bidding. A lot of thankless, unpaid time went into writing most of opensource code out there. To sit there and demand options is, to me, appallingly ignorant behaviour.

[-] Allero@lemmy.today 3 points 1 month ago

I contributed money, translations and properly filed bug reports to various open-source projects. But I don't think people who don't shouldn't speak out. Being unhappy with a certain change signals the direction for the devs to make their code better.

Besides, KDE is no hobby project; it's a nonprofit with full-time workers on a wage. Nonprofits are always kept to a high standard of accountability, and are resilient enough to turn negative feedback into directions for growth. It is in part this feedback that led it to develop the best DE out there.

[-] mmmm@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 month ago

I still wonder if the systemd imposition on the new login manager is absolute and can't be circumvented in any way, i.e. GNOME is allegedly dependent on systemd but you can circumvent it by using logind instead of the full systemd install

[-] nyan@lemmy.cafe 13 points 1 month ago

That's because someone took the time to pull out the minimum required interface code from systemd to make elogind after gnome made such a mess of things. It's a band-aid. More band-aids will no doubt be created to deal with this. It's just that the necessity is annoying.

[-] entwine@programming.dev 2 points 1 month ago

Why bother? It's not like there's a shortage of login managers out there.

[-] mmmm@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 month ago

I just don't like ssdm or logind non-integration with kde.

[-] bestboyfriendintheworld@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago

Systemd ist great and people who hate it, are also likely the same ones running openbox or a similar ancient window manager.

KDE should do what enables best user experience, not bend over for radicals stuck in the past.

I think KDE should force systemd.

[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

They should run tvwm. It's a great window manager, I ran it for years, in the 90s.

[-] vivendi@programming.dev 3 points 1 month ago

"Systemd is great", then systemdeeznuts and go use it. Don't make it a huge piece of shit half-imitation of svchost.exe that forces incompatibilities, so we can fuck off and use our own shit if we want to.

[-] bestboyfriendintheworld@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

That was always allowed.

[-] Chakravanti@monero.town 1 points 1 month ago

You are why I'm glad I don't even like KDE.

[-] bestboyfriendintheworld@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

What’s your preferred desktop environment?

[-] Chakravanti@monero.town 2 points 1 month ago

Noyb

[-] piccolo@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

https://files.catbox.moe/6hoghl.jpg

[-] Chakravanti@monero.town 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I just don't reply to assholes who intend to be such in a very narcissistic fashion by asking for information that they may merely shit in your face with answers to.

You, in that very name, are much more clearly self-aware of any shitting behavior that you make such great sounds to watch. Or at least, by those who like watching that shit. I did my homework while my brother watched that. Then got to watching Ronin Warriors while he did his.

[-] kbal@fedia.io 5 points 1 month ago

I like how the "FAQ" answers questions nobody was asking and accuses opponents of truth, freedom, and systemd of "decontextualising comments on merge requests" without mentioning what was actually said by whom in those merge requests so we could judge for ourselves. As a PR move to put out the flame war (which itself does seem really pointless) it seems counterproductive. But it looks like it's just another reddit post, not an official KDE policy statement or anything.

[-] entwine@programming.dev 4 points 1 month ago

opponents of truth, freedom, and systemd

Do you get paid by the Systemd Hate Club™ for your efforts? Are you full-time, or just a freelance clown?

[-] Allero@lemmy.today 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

As someone who relies on systemd, but wants to have alternatives:

While it is good that other login managers will still be able to start Plasma, making the default new login manager reliant on systemd is bad. It means that non-standard installations of KDE will now require more manual labor to make it work right. And while installing sddm is not big of a hassle, this sets a precedent that can later be expanded, making it a death by a thousand cuts for everything that dares not use systemd in its operation.

this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2026

81 points (94.5% liked)

Linux

13188 readers

146 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Ategon@programming.dev

anzo@programming.dev

dwraf_of_ignorance@programming.dev