45
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] SpiceDealer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 month ago

Without Dan Simmons and Hyperion, sci-fi literature would've been still been regarded as disposable paperbacks. Simmons did away with the trappings of early pulp sci-fi that held a shadow over the genre for many decades. Instead, Hyperion and Fall of Hyperion took the shape of the Western Canon and could be discussed as serious literature. Without spoiling too much, I remember reading the story of Sol Weintraub and his daughter and almost being brought to tears; something that no other book, regardless of genre, has done.

Rest well, scribe. Asimov, Heinland, Clarke, Herbert and, of course, Keats. You'll be in good company

[-] Zirconium@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I don't even have children and Sol Weintraub made me want to cry so hard

[-] Sergio@piefed.social 2 points 1 month ago

Without Dan Simmons and Hyperion, sci-fi literature would’ve been still been regarded as disposable paperbacks. Simmons did away with the trappings of early pulp sci-fi that held a shadow over the genre for many decades. Instead, Hyperion and Fall of Hyperion took the shape of the Western Canon and could be discussed as serious literature.

Hyperion was pretty good, but the 70s New Wave of science fiction had already done that: Ursula K. Le Guin, J. G. Ballard, Samuel Delany, etc. They deserve their credit.

[-] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago

Hadn't Bradbury already been doing a lot of that like 2 decades before? I guess it mentions him as a predecessor in that article, but if the movement is distinguished by "an emphasis on the psychological and social sciences as opposed to the physical sciences", that sounds like Bradbury to a T.

[-] zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago

That really sucks. Hyperion and The Fall of Hyperion are some of my favorite sci-fi books.

[-] Know_not_Scotty_does@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The next two books in the series got weirder because of the character's ages... That part doesn't hold up.

[-] RunJun@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

Well shit, I was going to circle back around to them in not too long.

[-] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Love that the author of the article jabbed Rothfus and Martin directly.

Hyperion is my favorite sci-fi next to Dune. It's inspired a lot of the features in my D&D homebrew world, including the Shrike, the river, a few deities, and other textures and layers to my realm.

Farewell, ~~friend. You were one of the good ones.~~ I wish you hadn't gone the wrong direction.

[-] Dearth@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

He was a good author but was completely brainwashed after 9/11

[-] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 2 points 1 month ago

This dude really did write multiple genres pretty well, even mashed together.

Absolutely fantastic world-building in Hyperion Cantos.

I also enjoyed Terror, the world descriptions are just situationally (like in a 3D space) pleasing for me, adjusted historical & mythological facts work really well, and even the story was rounded into a satisfactory end.

Rip.

[-] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 2 points 1 month ago
[-] nightwatch_admin@feddit.nl 2 points 1 month ago

I loved especially Hyperion, but I said my final goodbye the day I opened Flashback… what an awful piece of rear end production that was.

The Hyperion series was awesome, original, well-thought out, spiced with a background of Enoch the Prophet, flying space trees … and I’ll cherish it forever.

Flashback not so much, what a hateful piece of right wing trash that was. And I’m not necessarily against a solid story that makes me think or even just learn to appreciate other’s viewpoints, but this was more like something Ben Shapiro would write. “leftie bad hur durr”, you probably know what I mean. On top of that, it was shattered, incoherent and relied insanely on Deus Ex Machina constructions throughout.

I never understood and I never ever will I. Sad.

[-] Sergio@piefed.social 0 points 1 month ago

I never understood and I never ever will I.

Oh, I understand it. Simmons was too eager to tell us why he didn't like "certain people."

[-] nightwatch_admin@feddit.nl 1 points 1 month ago

Oh definitely. I just never understood how this could be the same author.

[-] ObtuseDoorFrame@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Most of the comments on social media about his passing are about his horrible politics rather than his writing. People are calling him a racist, a misogynist, and even a fascist.

Song of Kali confused me. It felt so hateful and so deeply racist that I assumed I missed something about it, like maybe it was satirical. Or maybe it was just about a character who hated India, which doesn't necessarily mean the author shares those views.

I loved Hyperion even with its misogynistic parts, I just sort of figured "boomers are gonna boom" and I was able to overlook it. Summer of Night was phenomenal, even if it did have the same "only one female character and she's a lot" problem that all his novels seem to have.

I don't see myself reading his other novels after reading about how racist he was. Quite a shame.

[-] Abundance114@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago

I loved Hyperion even with its misogynistic parts,

Isn't it strange that you can write a book about destroying an entire planet full of people and no one bats an eye; but if you include a political hot topic suddenly half of the population is protesting your book.

I would understand if he's actively promoting an idea but I don't think most books do that...

[-] falidorn@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

What a crazy coincidence that my newly formed book club chose this as our inaugural choice and then, literally just yesterday, finished Fall of Hyperion.

I appreciate you Dan Simmons. I’m sorry people no longer get to experience your imagination.

[-] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

I'm actually reading the first book right now... So I first saw the image which is the cover of the book I'm reading and thought "heyyyy!" then read the headline... oof.

[-] BallShapedMan@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Well shit. I wish the best for his loved ones. 77 is too young for sure.

[-] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

Is it? 77 feels just right to me for the end. Not too old to be decrepit, not young enough to regret it.

[-] KneeTitts@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

I always hoped to see a Hyperion movie, now without his guidance it'll come out and suck.

[-] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

SyFy (not its predecessor) had rights to it, but it never came to light. The Shrike is so hard to depict. Perhaps HBO or another with deep coffers could make it happen.

[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 month ago

IMO the Shrike is kind of unimportant to most of the storytelling. You could almost just narrate it and show shadows of a distant figure. It's the stalking threat that gives mystery and weight to the decisions of the characters to make the pilgrimage.

I always found the physical description of the Shrike to be one of the silliest aspects of the story.

[-] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

Without the Shrike, the story would not hold as much weight, even though he is not the essence of the problem, only a reflection or manifestation of it.

The Shrike, to me, was a feedback loop.

this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2026
45 points (97.9% liked)

Science Fiction

17167 readers
1 users here now

Welcome to /c/ScienceFiction

December book club canceled. Short stories instead!

We are a community for discussing all things Science Fiction. We want this to be a place for members to discuss and share everything they love about Science Fiction, whether that be books, movies, TV shows and more. Please feel free to take part and help our community grow.

  1. Be civil: disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally insult others.
  2. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, or advocating violence will be removed.
  3. Spam, self promotion, trolling, and bots are not allowed
  4. Put (Spoilers) in the title of your post if you anticipate spoilers.
  5. Please use spoiler tags whenever commenting a spoiler in a non-spoiler thread.

Lemmy World Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS