140

In a stunning admission, Leavitt told Bartiromo that mandatory conscription – not seen since the Vietnam War – had not been ruled out by her boss.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Ouch, my bone spurs.

[-] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Sadly, we all have "bone spurs", sorry my guy

[-] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

The motherfucking racist pedo chicken shit draft dodger is seriously considering military conscription, eh. Every single MAGA fuck should be lining up at the US Army Recruiting Office and signing the dotted line for 11B (Infantry).

[-] Blumpkinhead@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Can someone drop a house on this bitch already?

[-] 6stringringer@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago

There are like so many people working on this rn.

[-] desmosthenes@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

captain bone spurs wants conscription; that’s rich

[-] Redditsux@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago
[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I think they should be the first to volunteer. They were the ones stupid enough to think it was the Democratic Party that was warlike (LOL) and voted for the pedophile used car salesman.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

They won’t be the ones drafted.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 2 points 1 month ago

Why on earth would the US government risk a public outrage when they can just keep the system as it is and have poor people enlist for money?

[-] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

Fascism is capitalism in decay. As capitalism "runs out of runway", the capitalists start stripping the country for parts. In order to distract people/tamp down revolutionary anger, and squeeze the last profits, they'll reorient society towards total war. War at home and abroad.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

All the senator's sons safe tho.

[-] DarkGamer@fedia.io 1 points 1 month ago

A draft would ensure an entire generation never votes Republican again.

[-] kromem@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Who do you think is going to be drafted? You think the DOGE data grab plus the requests for state voter registration rolls aren't going to be used to filter a draft of the front lines to those they want out of the country?

How do you get US citizens out of the country if you can't legally deport them?

If they've been doing illegal shit the whole time with profiling, do you really think they aren't going to also profile in how they conduct a draft?

[-] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

And if you draft all of your political enemies to be the bulk of your military force, you’re giving them the training and the weaponry/keys to everything that allows them to go ahead with a coup.

That’s a bold strategy. They’re kind of fucked in both scenarios.

[-] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

It's really a question of scale. You don't make the majority of your draftees political draftees. Imagine if only one in twenty soldiers is drafted due to their political activities. You're not trying to draft every single person in the country that would want to vote against you. Rather, you draft people who start up resistance movements or alternative political parties. You don't draft everyone who attends the protest. But you do draft all the protest leaders. You start with the most prominent and go down the line until you've filled up as many of your political drafts as you feel comfortable.

It can be a very useful tool for a despot to target their political opposition. And it also has a silencing effect. It won't take long for people to notice and to prove that the draft board is politically biased. But then the courts OK it for some bullshit reason. Now you live in a country with a draft board that is politically motivated and not even trying to hide it. Imagine what effect that has on people's willingness to resist the regime.

But yeah, imagine being one of those political draftees. You're one in twenty. And everyone is told you're a political draftee, so no one wants to trust you. They know even being near you could cast suspicion on them. The vast majority of those around you are just poor unlucky bastards whose number came up. They tried their best to remain outside of politics, but politics came for them anyway. They just want to quietly do their time, keep their head down, and do their best to survive. Imagine being one of those one in twenty and trying to organize a coup. Maybe it would work. But history shows such rebellions are quite rare.

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Not if they use the Russian approach of not training you, not giving you a proper weapon, and sending you out to swarm the enemy and keep them busy killing you in large numbers. And shooting you themselves if you ask questions.

[-] LemmyFeed@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

Not if you ship them all off to be killed in war with little to no training first.

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

Seems likely from Putin fan Krasnov.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] TheHighRoad@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

It's a good thing they have all of our voting data and will be able to target conscription on those they don't like, which is exactly why and how they would do this.

[-] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

He’ll probably figure out some way to target blue states only.

[-] cmbabul@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

He’s really familiar with draft dodging so he won’t be surprised when the majority tells him to fuck right off

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] HasturInYellow@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

A lot of commanding officers are about to have accidents if they do that.

[-] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Yeah, I thought if anything, Vietnam tought the lesson that the draft is a terrible idea for overseas deployment.

Of course, learning from history is not exactly the style of this administration.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2026
140 points (99.3% liked)

politics

29574 readers
264 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS