77

Another Reddit refugee here,

I think we're all familiar with the Karma system on Reddit. Do you think Lemmy should have something similar? Because I can see cases for and against it.

For: a way to tracking quality contributions by a user, quantifying reputation. Useful to keep new accounts from spamming communities.

Against: Often not a useful metric, can be botted or otherwise unearned (see u/spez), maybe we should have something else?

What do you all think?

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] gary619@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago
[-] OutrageousUmpire@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

No. I think the numbers game lowers the level of discourse.

[-] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Absolutely. Even when our rational brain jokes about "worthless internet points", our monkey minds see "big number mean me good". I'm man enough to admit it, having a well liked comment feels good. But it's not good for me.

[-] Denuath@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Karma was always so irrelevant for me, I won't miss it.

[-] entropicshart@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Glad to see how many folks are against it. Karma would not bring any value to Lemmy.

[-] MusketeerX@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

I don't think we need it.

You can already see which posts are up/down voted. You can already check a user accounts age and post history.

I don't need more than that.

[-] wwaxwork@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

I have over 350k karma on reddit. They are magic internet points worth exactly nothing, we don't need that here. Though I wouldn't mind being able to award people if they say something super cool. Maybe an award a day or a week to give away might be fun. They're still worth nothing, but sometimes a post deserves a little bit more than just an upvote and a little internet sticker on the post is just the thing.

[-] RoboticMask@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

They aren't exactly worth nothing. If you have too low karma (in a subreddit), your comments will be hidden etc. I uttered an unpopular opinion in a sub once, got downvoted to oblivion for it, and since then every single one of my comments is hidden. You always need to carefully judge how many unpopular opinions you can say in a subreddit until your karma falls below the threshold.

[-] wwaxwork@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I did not know that.

[-] TommySalami@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

The only instance I can think of Karma being beneficial is in highly specific forums where user reputation could be an important metric for new users, or those seeking info. Very limited.

When it gets to something as general as this it just becomes popularity/feel-good points. Not necessarily evil, but no real benefit. Upvotes are still a thing for that social media dopamine hit.

[-] piezzo@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Well, karma itself isnt a bad idea in my opinion, but making it visible to others isnt. Making it hidden will stop the karmafarming.

[-] meyotch@lemmy.mitchday.com 2 points 2 years ago

Id say no. Karma leads to gamification and gamification leads to enshittification.

I’d rather have lower traffic and higher quality. Karma is of real benefit only to commercial owners, not users.

[-] MiddleWeigh@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Is there a way to track it, but not show it? Does that makes sense?

To keep people from farming etc, but to also keep the discussion meaningful?

Tbh I'm also indifferent but I see where your coming from.

I'd like to foster a community where this isn't needed, but people are people.

[-] EphemeralSun@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

How would this even be implemented? What's to prevent one user from generating massive amounts of karma on their own instance?

[-] Fondots@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I don't think karma was ever particularly useful on Reddit. You can't really differentiate between someone with a lot of karma from a whole lot of low-effort posts and someone who has made fewer but higher-quality contributions just from karma scores. For that you really need to look through their comment and post histories

I like numbers and statistics so I'd be interested in seeing them here, but it's just a curiosity and not in any particular way actually useful.

[-] Darkenmal@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Karma ruined Reddit. Let's not repeat the same mistake here.

[-] Billy_Gnosis@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

No. There should be no fake internet points at all.

[-] joroo@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I don't think we should. I think we should get rid of (visible) up- and downvotes all together. There are too many online spaces where you can get status from likes or upvotes. Let this be a space without all that.

[-] dustyData@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I love the mastodon approach. Each instance is free to enable this numbers, but by default all numbers of up, down, likes, boosts or retweets are hidden. It makes for such peaceful interactions and stress free browsing. There's no number to track and cause anxiety or anguish.

[-] cerevant@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I say don't bother - if it can be gamed by bots, it will. Even Slashdot's mod/meta-mod system could be gamed by the current generation of bots, because a lot of comments / reposts look fine out of context.

If you don't have karma there's nothing to farm, and that means fewer karma farming bots and better overall quality of content.

[-] Geek_King@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I say no, it was ripe for abuse, with karma farming bots which get sold to entities looking to influence and astroturf a platform.

[-] Jomn@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

I feel like karma is a bad metric to track quality contributions, especially if it is global to all communities. It's far too easy to farm. People that make useful contributions in specific communities will be known over time by other members of said community anyway.

[-] fsk@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

No. It just leads to people gaming the system. I also think that counting upvotes but not downvotes is also a good idea, when ranking which posts show first. Too many people use downvote for "I disagree", which means a true idea with less than 50% popularity gets buried.

[-] vreraan@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Similarly the most voted ideas does not mean they are good ideas, However, it is right that ideas that are too shitty go into the oblivion of downvotes.

[-] Rozauhtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 years ago

I'd rather not have karma at all; or at the very least they should try something different instead of just copying what reddit did.

Some servers already decided to disable either the system completely or just the downvotes.

[-] Cybermass@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I think instead of karma we should have an activity and age metric, a badge or something showing how many months/years your account has existed, and an activity metric like posts&comments/day so that it's easy to tell an old, regularly active account from a young account that is spamming a a bunch of comments per day.

[-] squaresinger@feddit.de 1 points 2 years ago

We already have that. Just press a user's name and then you can see all that.

You, for example, created 3 posts, 31 comments and have been on lemmy for ~2 weeks now.

[-] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

The only use for karma is filtering trolls

Lemmy hasn't gotten a large enough population to need that kind of filter yet, and it would require an automod capability to use anyway.

So, no, fuck the entire idea of it otherwise. Fuck the algorithm behind it, fuck the hidden nature of it.

[-] Nioxic@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

for what purpose?

i genuinly cant think of any reason other than encourage reposting bots

personally i dont care at all about karma.

so long as the upvote/downvote system works, regarding post (and comment) visibility etc.

[-] JeffCraig@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Karma is a great method of driving interaction, but like you've highlighted, it can result in a lot of unwanted behaviors.

Other social media is a good example of what to be avoided. People are driven to gather more followers and their content devolves into the lowest common denominator rapidly.

I wouldn't mind some form of recognition for people that contribute good content to communities, but I don't know exactly what that would look like.

As far as karma goes, we have a technological limitation in the fediverse, where your karma would be limited to the instance your user account is registered on. They could figure out how to make it work, but I'm just not sure it's worth the effort. We have a lot of other things to focus on atm.

[-] Guatch@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I Gota downvote this idea. Karma was my least favorite part about Reddit

[-] cultsuperstar@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

No, it's not necessary. Who cares who contributes a lot? If a user cares about karma, then they should just stay at Reddit. We don't need this to be a Reddit clone.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2023
77 points (86.7% liked)

No Stupid Questions

41532 readers
361 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS