35

The UK government has backtracked on its position on copyright and AI, stating it must take time to "get this right".

Its original position - allowing AI companies to use copyrighted works to train their models with an opt-out option - received major backlash from the likes of Sir Elton John and Dua Lipa.

"We have listened," Technology Secretary Liz Kendall said on Wednesday, saying the government no longer favours that approach.

However, the government's position is now unclear, saying it "no longer has a preferred option" for what to do next.

...

It is attempting to balance the interests of the two sectors by giving creatives control of how their work is used, while recognising AI models need to be trained on work such as writing, music and video.

In a report (open pdf) published on Wednesday, the government said there was "no consensus on how these objectives should be achieved".

...

Mandy Hill, president of the Publishers Association, said the backtrack was a victory "over the self-interest of a handful of large corporations".

However, Hill said the government has not entirely ruled out allowing tech companies to use copyrighted content to train AI models without a license.

"The existing law is clear," she added. "Copyright material cannot be used for AI development and training without permission."

...

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] GMac@feddit.org 18 points 1 day ago

Copyright law needs to change with things becoming public domain much sooner than the currently do, but... If a bunch of billionaires want to profit off someone elses work by using material to train AI, they can bloody well pay fairly for that use, or accept if the owner of that material refuses to permit/license them.

The basic premise that there is some universally accepted 'need' to train ai models is just not one i can see as valid.

[-] Deceptichum@quokk.au 8 points 23 hours ago

They can backtrack on stuff that is important to other businesses but not on stuff like Israel’s Genocide on Gaza or repressing Trans Rights?

[-] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 2 points 23 hours ago

Well yeah, how would that benefit other rich people?

[-] MoogleMaestro@lemmy.zip 0 points 21 hours ago

Well, I mean, good. Because the old policy fucking sucked for artists.

this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2026
35 points (97.3% liked)

United Kingdom

6595 readers
211 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS