32

You'll use AI and like it too - if you work for PwC. Paul Griggs, US chief executive of the global professional services giant, has made clear there is no room at the corporation for AI skeptics.

Speaking to the Financial Times, Griggs indicated that anyone who believed they had the "opportunity to opt out" of AI is "not going to be here that long," and warned senior staff not "paranoid about being AI-first" will be replaced by others who are more comfortable with the tech.

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] siravious@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago

“Fuck them. And any “AI First” company. Do you think we forgot about “cloud first”? Or that Boeing is a “digital company that just happens to sell airplanes”?

Fucking hype chasing drooling brainwashed simpletons

[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 weeks ago

Yes, actually, i dont, you don't, but "we" forget shit like this all day,.every day, all the fucking Time

Once this shit is over, most people will not have a single fucking clue what any of these fucking evil companies did.

Hell, even now, Facebook/ Instagram's meta is fucking the world, and most of their users are clueless while it's going on

[-] eleitl@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Name me an (IT) consulting company which isn't pushing AI.

[-] kescusay@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago

My god, the accountants who eventually have to clean up this mess will make so goddamn much money.

[-] frongt@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 weeks ago

I'm sure they'll just hire another professional services company.

GDP economists hate this one weird trick!

[-] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 14 points 2 weeks ago

Ah, yes, firing everyone that's not a sycophant. That always ends up well for any organisation. /s

[-] pdxfed@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

It's also just generally a good barometer of a good idea. If people can't independently evaluate an idea and come to a similar conclusion on their own, it just means that you simply apply coercion and then you get to be right! It's excellent as a management practice which I'll note all the big 4 claim to offer...

[-] SpicyLizards@reddthat.com 11 points 2 weeks ago

So, hiring PwC is the same as using AI?

[-] zbyte64@awful.systems 10 points 2 weeks ago

Yes, so you should ask for a big discount.

[-] andallthat@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Not only that, from the article they are actively trying to become a Consultancy As A Service company, where somehow other companies would pay a subscription fee to.... talk to their AI, I guess?

The only time I've had to do with PWC, it was to get their advice on a compliance / tax related process. And it was less about the process itself or the 3 page pdf they produced (which much cheaper companies could have done better) and more because their "seal of approval" would give my company some leverage if the IRS had something against the process we implemented. "This was designed with PWC" means "we tried really really hard to do abide by the incredibly confusing wording of the law".

I doubt that "we asked PWC's chatbot" will have the same level of clout, but these guys have connections everywhere so I'm sure they will lobby pretty hard to get some ad-hoc law or some level of "certification" on the output of their future AI.

[-] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

You must adhere to my religion or you will no longer be working for this company.

[-] python@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

Oh shit, I applied to that company a few days ago. Guess I'll be telling them to fuck right off when they call back

[-] Mac@mander.xyz 3 points 2 weeks ago

Make them hire and then fire you. lol

[-] python@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Would be an option, firing someone after their trial period (usually 3 months) is over is an incredible pain in the ass around here lol

[-] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 weeks ago

It's the biggest racketeering scheme in history and seems like everyone wants in

[-] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Well, it’s not like PwC does stuff where anally-retentive levels of accuracy and precision are required, so I can see why they’d be all for AI. /s

Deloitte and ~~Arthur Andersen~~ Accenture are saying the same things. Are KPMG and EY going the same route or looking for the market opportunity of “being correct” which I’ve heard is important in accountancy.

[-] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 4 points 2 weeks ago

Accidenture

ftfy

[-] tired_n_bored@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

Will age like milk

[-] civ@lemmy.civl.cc 4 points 2 weeks ago

I'm so tired of seeing AI generated images of robots using computers

[-] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Can't wait for this to spoil in the fridge.

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Well they had a good run

this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2026
32 points (97.1% liked)

Technology

83529 readers
792 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS