89
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] grue@lemmy.world 87 points 1 month ago

Nobody gives a fuck about your weaseling technicalities. The salient fact is that this change was made in order to "comply in advance" with totalitarian fuckery. It SIGNALS POLITICAL SUPPORT for it, and that's not okay!

[-] Balinares@pawb.social 30 points 1 month ago

I studied at the PR in question and that's not the conclusion I arrive at. Let me try to explain how this looks to me.

Also keep in mind, I do think we absolutely need to keep the political pressure on and push back on identity-gating policies with all our collective might. In that light the PR itself does the two things I'd absolutely require here: one, it allows the user to put whatever value they want in that field, including none at all, and two, it disallows all apps from reading that field without the user's active permission.

Basically it's a superficially valid implementation of a bullshit requirement that still leaves all the power in the user's hands and therefore renders the requirement meaningless. Or in other words, a huge middle finger to the proponents of age-checking.

Mind you, I feel there's also value in loud non-compliance and I'm glad some are taking that road -- keep it up, folks. But I'm leery of demands that only one single approach be taken. This needs to be fought on every front we can. And to me the PR in question reads like an effective defensive move.

load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[-] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 54 points 1 month ago

Couldn't reply to me pointing out that this was merged, and was stated to be explicitly to support age verification laws, so you had to lie about it as a meme instead.

Because thats what youre doing right now, lying and spreading misinformation. You can admit it.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] bookmeat@fedinsfw.app 50 points 1 month ago
load more comments (10 replies)
[-] Maxxie@piefed.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 month ago

"It is too late, for I have already straw-manned your argument in a meme"

[-] peacefulpixel@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

source? i mean you went through the effort to post a meme about it at least include the relevant information

load more comments (18 replies)
[-] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 month ago

Storing a users birthday is useful metadata anyway. I'm surprised it wasn't stored before.

The age isn't verified is any way. You can set it to the 1800s for all it cares

[-] Opisek@piefed.blahaj.zone 27 points 1 month ago

This is not very 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 of you.

[-] Madrigal@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

How does one enter an older DOB without causing an underflow?

[-] TheGingerNut@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 month ago

Implement it as a s64 instead of a u64. Ugh, honestly. Back when it was a 32 bit integer it made sense to make it unsigned because we'd have run out of numbers by now otherwise. But as of the advent of 64 bit unix time values there's really no reason not to implement it as a signed value smh

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] WraithGear@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

your argument is an oxymoron. if the data is useful meta data, but the user can just put what ever they want as the date then it’s not storeing useful data. and that means it should not exist.

unless the point is to use it in the future where the user can’t enter what ever they want and thus legitimizes all the commotion.

[-] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago

You can also store an email there, so it can be found by other programs, but you can also leave it blank, or enter a fake email if you don't want your email to be stored.

Given the open nature of Linux, I find it hard to believe they can lock it down like that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] RustyNova@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

Yeah like the email address and the full name of the user.

... What do you mean it's blank for 99% of users?

[-] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 15 points 1 month ago

Email address and name are actually useful for network environments of a system admin needs to know who is the user behind a process or something. How old the user is is complete useless.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 12 points 1 month ago

How is that useful information? To what purpose?

[-] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 5 points 1 month ago

Auto-filling those "you must be at least X old to access this content" inputs could be one? Eg Steam could skip that page directly when accessing 18+ games.

I suppose you could ask the same for the realName and location fields that are already in systemd.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] tomiant@piefed.social 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Well I still don't dang like it I'll tell you hwat.

[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

There's a bunch of idiots looking to crucify someone over this. This fucking witchhunt bullshit is really shaking my faith in the basic goodness of the Linux community. Trying to make some dev that put a line of code in systemd into a pariah isn't a good look for opensource.

Edit: 4 fuckwits and counting that don't have the courage to show their usernames by telling me why I'm wrong to despise pitchfork mobs.

[-] Telemachus93@slrpnk.net 17 points 1 month ago

You won't listen anyway. Just look at your language, calling us idiots and fuckwits while pretending you're the level-headed one.

There's enough comments under just this meme and every single discussion on this topic explaining why that change is a direct attack on privacy and privacy being the reason why many of us chose Linux.

[-] Vlyn@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 month ago

Just because one idiot state in the US changes a law doesn't mean the entire world needs to follow. Fuck em.

[-] FreddiesLantern@leminal.space 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

There’s a disconnect over this in that one side looks at the present data and other takes a possible result from that into account. (dividing people into groups…for the sake of argument ok?)

Now from strictly an IT perspective, this is indeed pretty meaningless. One line of code that stores one piece of data. Who cares right?

From the other side you take the very hot topics of politics and privacy into account (two things that are also very front and center with most of the Lemmy crowd afaik).

Because it can start by just one line of code but where will it end? Personally I’d rather be over cautious and assume the worst.

I mean look at the story of cookies. Back in the 90’s they were a small benign piece of data and look how that turned out. Our entire world is influenced by it today to great extend.

Personally I’d rather be overly cautious.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] PieMePlenty@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

I found it extremely funny when people started asking for systemd replacements, of all things, after systemd added the ability to store a birth date.

[-] EatMyPixelDust@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 month ago

Hell no, we didn't fall for anything. This is a real problem with real and far-reaching consequences, associated to multiple legislative attacks against privacy etc, pushed by corporates and religious groups.

YOU fell for the "think of the children" lie and "It's just a text field" BS. No, this is far worse than just a text field.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2026
89 points (67.9% liked)

linuxmemes

31278 readers
64 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack users for any reason. This includes using blanket terms, like "every user of thing".
  • Don't get baited into back-and-forth insults. We are not animals.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn, no politics, no trolling or ragebaiting.
  • Don't come looking for advice, this is not the right community.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, <loves/tolerates/hates> systemd, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  • 5. 🇬🇧 Language/язык/Sprache
  • This is primarily an English-speaking community. 🇬🇧🇦🇺🇺🇸
  • Comments written in other languages are allowed.
  • The substance of a post should be comprehensible for people who only speak English.
  • Titles and post bodies written in other languages will be allowed, but only as long as the above rule is observed.
  • 6. (NEW!) Regarding public figuresWe all have our opinions, and certain public figures can be divisive. Keep in mind that this is a community for memes and light-hearted fun, not for airing grievances or leveling accusations.
  • Keep discussions polite and free of disparagement.
  • We are never in possession of all of the facts. Defamatory comments will not be tolerated.
  • Discussions that get too heated will be locked and offending comments removed.
  •  

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't remove France.

    founded 2 years ago
    MODERATORS