How will the ethics be computed? Some people care about AI use in development, some about mass firings, and still others about the presence of non-white characters.

Would your moral compass be imposed or would it merely be a list of attributes that others can assign weights to for a final score based on their criteria?

Hell, why limit it to gaming? I mean I know this is posted to Gaming, but still. There could be a lot of benefit to a tech industry wide Public Shame Index with how utterly soulless some companies are getting. Though, it would be under constant pressure from the largest companies to call it slander or libel, whatever they'd try to say to the abuse contact email of whoever hosts it to get it taken down.

I'd propose instead a review platform specific to companies, so users can leave their votes and the evaluation average is the company's score. And in that idea, apparently ~~NodeDB~~ NeoDB, which has ActivityPub support, can do. Just yet to test to see how reliable it is, and how it propagates around.

There's a number of problems with a site like that.

1. The need to have some level of ranking for bad and good things is very problematic.
2. Even if it's true, being a catalog of all sorts of negative things a large company does will likely come with a lawyer bill that makes it not worth it.
3. Game companies change a lot, is it fair to carry over bad deeds if a company gets acquired? What if a large amount of people leave company A and found company B, is that a clean slate or should the harassment concerns be noted for them as well?
4. Should there be a forgiveness period on bad things or a forget period for good things?
5. Does good things with tax incentives or in the midst of scandal even count as good?

In the current state of things, might as well call it an AI score board. If that's not your intent, that's what it will become.