7

[Op-ed by Human Right Lawyer Benedict Rogers.]

Archived

Almost six years ago, within hours of the imposition of a draconian National Security Law by Beijing on Hong Kong, the British government initiated a new scheme for Hong Kongers to find sanctuary and a pathway to citizenship in the United Kingdom. It was announced by the prime minister at the time, Boris Johnson, and championed by his Home Secretary Priti Patel. It received unanimous cross-party support. It was one of the few things upon which Boris Johnson and Keir Starmer agreed.

Broadly speaking, that consensus has continued.

[...]

However, there is one individual whose case is causing considerable concern among the diaspora community and those who support them. He is one of Hong Kong’s most prominent pro-democracy campaigners, has endured a campaign of harassment and threats from the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) here in Britain, and he has a price on his head. His name is Finn Lau and he is my friend.

Finn came to Britain in 2019 on a working visa as a chartered surveyor, but switched to the BNO visa two years later. In 2024, he was granted indefinite leave to remain. In June 2025, in accordance with the rules, he applied for British citizenship.

Yet more than nine months later, his application remains undecided. The Home Office says it is still conducting “good character” checks.

[...]

Three years ago, the Hong Kong government issued an arrest warrant for Finn and placed a £100,000 bounty on his head. He has also received various other threats which have been widely reported in the media. In the current trial of alleged spies from the Hong Kong Economic and Trade Office, Finn has been cited as a major target of espionage. During the 2019 protests, he was arrested and detained for 48 hours – and only released because the Hong Kong police did not realise that he had played a key role in mobilising demonstrators.

[...]

Unnecessarily delaying Finn Lau’s citizenship application not only causes him uncertainty. It sends mixed messages to the Hong Kong diaspora whom we have rightly welcomed into our country. At a time when they are seeking stability and trying to settle down to new lives in Britain, this uncertainty causes them unnecessary alarm and confusion. In the same week that the Home Office told Finn they were still conducting “good character” checks, 10 Downing Street invited him to a Lunar New Year reception. This inconsistency and limbo is unacceptable.

[...]

Most likely, this delay is an administrative hiccup. In the British government, cock-ups are more usual than conspiracies. Nevertheless, the threats to Finn Lau – and the dire consequences if he were to be rendered stateless or worse, deported to Hong Kong to face certain long-term imprisonment – ought to make his case a slam dunk.

[...]

In an era of often toxic political debates, support for Hong Kongers is one of the few issues that unites our politicians across all parties and that must remain the case. So surely it is in the Home Office’s interests to spare any further bureaucracy or embarrassment by approving his citizenship – and in so doing, sending a clear and unambiguous message to the thousands of Hong Kongers who have come to the United Kingdom over the past six years: you are very welcome here.

top 1 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Tim_Bisley@piefed.social 1 points 27 minutes ago

Man I hope he gets sorted out. The UK should be a safe haven for political activists coming from HK.

this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2026
7 points (81.8% liked)

United Kingdom

6612 readers
200 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS