1
submitted 3 weeks ago by Beep@lemmus.org to c/technology@lemmy.world
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] pennomi@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

What stops someone from validating an account, then posting using a bot?

[-] MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com 2 points 3 weeks ago

I don't necessarily support this, but I feel like this at least adds a barrier to a single person setting up hundreds of bot accounts easily. Similar to locking your doors, it just adds friction to those that would otherwise not put a lot of effort in. People can still break into your house/run a bot farm, but this makes it just that much more difficult. Again, I don't really support doing this, and it's definitely not being done for user's benefit, but it will likely have some impact on botting.

[-] db2@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

but I feel like this at least adds a barrier to a single person setting up hundreds of bot accounts easily

Cheap labor from scam centers in India has entered the chat

[-] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works -1 points 3 weeks ago

Let me be the first to downvote you shit take.

[-] daychilde@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

The article basically says that posting using the API will get posts labeled as "[App]". That's what it boils down to. They even talk about human accounts using AI to write posts.

[-] pennomi@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

If you can connect to a site using a browser, so can a bot.

[-] Evotech@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago

It’ll be much more annoying to automate but can’t the ais just use computers now?

Much more expensive to manage bot farms though

[-] pennomi@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

It’s trivial to automate browser clicks like that with AI these days.

But yeah, more expensive than an API call.

[-] daychilde@lemmy.world -1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Yes, but what does that have to do with my comment? (edit: they explained the context below)

[-] pennomi@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I’m just saying that the proposed solution will be ineffective at filtering bots, but create a false sense of security.

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

The post mentions World ID as an example of a third-party service that used biometrics as a basis to prove humanness, and says “the internet needs verification solutions like this, where your account information, usage data, and identity never mix.”

Yup, knew it. This is all just an excuse to get Sam Altman to scan your eyeballs

[-] db2@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago
[-] GutterRat42@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

r/conservative is going to lose so much engagment

[-] realitista@lemmus.org 1 points 3 weeks ago

What happens when they realize it's all bots?

this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2026
1 points (60.0% liked)

Technology

84101 readers
225 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS