154

Incredible, someone at Red Hat is apparently reading my toots and slowly scrubbing their website of references to their "compressing the kill cycle" project. Here's the file they don't want you to read: web.archive.org/web/20260402… p.s. if you work at Red Hat and have inside info on what's going on, my Signal is "@legoktm.12345" - happy to protect you.

Disgusting. For those unaware, IBM has acquired Red Hat a few years back (they are heavily involved in Linux development and related technologies). "Technology is apolitical" bros can bite me.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] mathemachristian@hexbear.net 63 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

With Red Hat Device Edge Lockheed Martin is leading the infusion of cutting-edge commercial technology into military capabilities that deliver advanced solutions to our customers.
Justin Taylor, Vice President, F-22 technology, Lockheed Martin

this sentence should be enough to drop red hat instantly

[-] JustSo@hexbear.net 28 points 2 weeks ago

"grey"hat to the max. disgusting.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Beaver@hexbear.net 15 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

This is so much worse than I expected. They seemed to be actively pivoting to a Palantir-esque "yeah, we're the bad guys" strategy, but are chickening out a bit on broadcasting it.

[-] JustSo@hexbear.net 48 points 2 weeks ago

I have been saying that Fedora is THE GUY for doing linux in bed with the US government. It's always the first distro to push to mainstream new tantalizingly convenient technologies developed by their pet devs replacing well understood code that's had thousands of eyeballs on it over the years.

I don't fuck with Fedora. I considered them fairly benign-to-positive back when I was less of a hardliner, but these days I consider them to be sucking the good will, talent and money out of the industry, sitting in an incumbent role as a commercial contractor that could be served by a thousand smaller local companies.

BDS the shit out of them. Redhat was cool back in the day, thanks for that, now move out of the way.

[-] aanes_appreciator@hexbear.net 25 points 2 weeks ago

It's a fuckin shame because Fedora is genuinely the most stable and functional distro I've used since moving to Linux. It feels like a polished product.

Then again, it feels like a product from an American corporate machine that gets away with it because they're marginally better than their competitiors (see: Valve Inc. and Steam).

And then what? we have Ubuntu derivatives (another US state asset). Debian is potentially close to a stable user distro that isn't as deeply entrenched in the imperial core. But then surely any distro is under the thumb of the fascists? Linux is de facto property of Intel, Cisco, IBM, Oracle, and a bunch of other CIA fronts.

Not to shit on boycotting Redhat or Fedora, but I just wonder how many steps of separation it is from Linux and its own evils.

[-] JustSo@hexbear.net 8 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah I had to make a burner laptop for travel a while back and was really surprised with how slick and luser-proof their distro was. Had like way better mixed DPI support and a bunch of other conveniences I didn't think were solved at the time.

I reckon OpenSuse might be the next best thing to Fedora in this regard, but I've only used it a little bit and don't know enough to whole heartedly recommend it. I just have found Suse had also managed to create that slick professional experience and also streamlined a lot of the best "new shit" into a distro that felt like it should meet the expectations of eg a Mac user or a corporate Windows user (with some training.)

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 18 points 2 weeks ago

People on the FEDiverse almost convinced me to switch from NixOS to FEDora because NixOS is too problematic.

[-] hello_hello@hexbear.net 19 points 2 weeks ago

Linux Maoist standard english lol.

NixOS is also dependent on Microsoft GitHub and AWS for infrastructure and have zero plans to address this.

[-] JustSo@hexbear.net 9 points 2 weeks ago

Problematic in what sense? I don't know much about NixOS or its "scene" or whatever.

I had to make an installer for someone who wanted to install Bazzite which I was disappointed to learn is yet another FEDora RAT.

[-] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 18 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

A large part of tHe NiXOs CoMmUnItY is MIC like Anduril. Which yes is a big whammy.

There are other divides too but this is the most morally hazardous.

[-] balsoft@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 days ago

Yep, we/they even re-elected an anduril employee to the steering committee (I put him literally last on my ballot and tried to campaign for others to do the same but I guess it wasn't enough). I mostly stopped interacting with the community after that. The tech is cool, Nixpkgs is a goldmine of knowledge comparable to ArchWiki, but the community turned into a nazi bar :/

[-] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 1 points 4 days ago

Tomberek has been voted in last place the most of all candidates. Not something ballot count takes into account.

[-] balsoft@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 days ago

I'm pretty sure the ballot count did take that into account, it was a Meek STV (single-transferrable vote), so if a candidate was voted low in preference lists a lot they generally wouldn't win. The issues is that while a lot of people put him last, more people didn't.

[-] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 1 points 4 days ago

Putting someone in 10th or in last place makes almost no practical difference, enough people put him among the first places to get him in.

[-] JustSo@hexbear.net 8 points 2 weeks ago

Oh yeah absolutely.

[-] ATS1312@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 weeks ago
[-] AssortedBiscuits@hexbear.net 9 points 2 weeks ago

CachyOS

What's the selling point for CachyOS? Is it basically the gaming distro based on Arch that is not SteamOS?

[-] ATS1312@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, basically. And its set up to be a much simpler install than Arch.

Again, it beat Windows at Windows gaming.

[-] AssortedBiscuits@hexbear.net 23 points 2 weeks ago

Damn. Is it really just Debian and Arch that don't have skeletons in their closet?

[-] JustSo@hexbear.net 15 points 2 weeks ago

I dunno I've never seen any valid criticism of slackware.

[-] PorkrollPosadist@hexbear.net 9 points 1 week ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] JustSo@hexbear.net 20 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Oh and when I say ""i have been saying" I mean since the early 2000s btw.

https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/red-Hats-decade-of-collaboration-with-government-and-the-open-source-community

And older archive of that page, but I don't think much has changed in the text since its an old blog post from 2012: https://archive.ph/7GBl4

accusations / discourse from 2014: https://fossforce.com/2014/01/red-hat-working-nsa/

systemd

https://sfconservancy.org/blog/2023/jun/23/rhel-gpl-analysis/

(lol redhat's consultancy wing's gitlab instance got pwnt by a crew called Crimson Collective at the end of last year - I'm guessing there are some really interesting clients in the data set. lol based they just found leaked auth tokens with trufflehog. that's so funny)

[-] codexarcanum@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 2 weeks ago

I'm not a Linux newbie, but I do hate having to compile and install and generally "be a tech guy" about my casual gaming and writing computer.

So I just use Linux Mint. I know, I know: it's Debian, you've probably got many Linux User thoughts about it. But several folks were like "what will I suggest to the normie's now?" Mint. Get them on Mint, it's easy, well supported, and rarely gives me trouble.

Plus, they're not doing war crimes (that I know of!)

[-] JustSo@hexbear.net 12 points 2 weeks ago

I have mixed successes with Mint but when it works and when it's on well supported hardware it is a nice convenient distro. I hesitate to suggest it because I've recommended it to people who had a horrible time with it.

It's so hard to recommend distros.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] PorkrollPosadist@hexbear.net 19 points 2 weeks ago

I guess I won't be recommending Fedora anymore. Holy shit.

[-] companero@hexbear.net 17 points 2 weeks ago

Is there anything else that has smooth installation, vanilla GNOME, and a good balance of stability and updates? I stopped distro hopping after I found Fedora because it was perfect for me sadness

[-] JustSo@hexbear.net 13 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

As far as traditional style distros, I have always been impressed with OpenSuse Tumbleweed when I've needed like polished "corporate ready" distro.

They build and maintain the distros and build tools etc. In particular OpenSuse was the first distro I used that offered to set up BTRFS filesystem snapshots and rollback support as part of the GUI installer. A lot of corpo / consultancy money goes into keeping it competitive and fairly slick. Same as Redhat really.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Liketearsinrain@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago

Use Ubuntu or stay on Mint. (really, they are fine, I have been around long enough for when the hyped distro for new users was Mint instead of Ubuntu). No one hypes the stuff that works like OpenSUSE (well, someone mentioned it to you, think it's a good distro but they are EU Red Hat).

[-] Egonallanon@feddit.uk 15 points 2 weeks ago

While I'm not all that surprised I'm upset nonetheless.

[-] hello_hello@hexbear.net 13 points 2 weeks ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] communism@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 weeks ago

A real shame. I do think there are other OSes with the same level of polish as Fedora, but not ones as "normie-friendly" to recommend to people.

[-] PorkrollPosadist@hexbear.net 6 points 1 week ago

It may come across as piling on now that there's blood in the water, but quality control in Fedora has slipped recently. The update to 43 caused me some mild inconvenience (compared to a seamless experience in the past) and when my brother did it this week we ended up reinstalling, only to discover TWO bugs in the installation process (one caused by improper handling of Btrfs subvolumes, one caused by a bug somewhere in the nouveau-mesa-Gtk pipeline, neither with useful error messages).

These recent experiences have given me some reservations aside from the politics of IBM/Red Hat.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] asdasd201@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

So, which distro should I switch to from Fedora?

[-] absurdity_of_it_all@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 weeks ago

I switched for the same reason long ago and I only used it because it was more up to date than Debian. Now I use Solus. It's a curated rolling release with a weekly cycle. Pretty good so far, not much issues.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] JustSo@hexbear.net 6 points 2 weeks ago

Do you use your computer for anything obscure or interesting?

Are you trying to do enthusiastic linux nerd stuff or do you want something that just works and is (relatively, hopefully) easy?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] SootySootySoot@hexbear.net 10 points 2 weeks ago

Non-archive link for those that struggle - https://www.dlt.com/sites/default/files/documents/2025-01/ve-compress-the-kill-cycle-detail-693397pr-202402-en_3.pdf

Ugh. I use Fedora, which I'll probably keep doing for now. But I'll stop showing it any support or helping with code at all. This shit is unfortunately inevitable when a profit motive enters.

[-] comrade_pibb@hexbear.net 9 points 1 week ago

I use Arch btw

[-] tombruzzo@hexbear.net 6 points 1 week ago

It never sat well with me that Red Hat was owned by IBM. This shouldn't be surprising given one of IBM's clients in the 40s.

I won't switch my big PC off bazzite yet, but I have a thinkpad running Fedora I could switch to Arch to finally try out. Heck, it could probably get away with vanilla debian

[-] NewOldGuard@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago

I have mostly used Fedora derivatives and NixOS over the last few years. I resent corporate involvement in Linux but I accepted it as the cost of top-tier support and maintenance. I’d just avoid the worst offenders, like Ubuntu. However with all of the military industrial ties coming to light, with Red Hat doing this shit alongside its government work, and Nix having ties to Anduril, I’m giving up corporate distros completely. And with systemd capitulating and adding supporting code for the age-verification legislation, I’m looking to get away from that too. I don’t mean to fear monger, systemd and distros including it don’t have age verification or attestation yet, but they’re clearly working towards it.

I would love to use Auxolotl and Lix to keep things declarative and deterministic, but they just aren’t ready yet. Migrating my PCs to Artix this week, and my server to Devuan. Gonna do my configuration with Ansible to retain a sense of declarative config. These projects have their own problems but they’re much more dedicated to resisting surveillance and protecting user sovereignty, which is a must for me.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2026
154 points (100.0% liked)

technology

24339 readers
69 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS