27
submitted 2 weeks ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Even as a triumphant moon flyby primes agency for a 2028 landing, Trump’s proposed budget cuts cast pall on US space program

Even as Integrity, the mission moniker for the Orion capsule of Artemis II, ascended into the heavens days ago, Donald Trump was announcing his intention to slash NASA’s budget by 23%, including a 46% cut for space science initiatives.

And the Artemis program that has run years behind schedule and billions of dollars over budget offers no guarantees that the next, far harder stages will run as smoothly.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] drascus@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

If it's good and hopeful trump will be against it.

[-] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 2 points 1 week ago

So does anyone else remember when trump said they would have a moon base? Like the whole going back to the moon thing was kinda his thing?

The world was looking at other space programs, but no usa needed to moon it, and now never mind space...

[-] CatalpaRed@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago

Genuine question: Is artemis II a "Fuck You" to Elon Musk bc his shitty rockets cannot get out of orbit with 0 payload while the government builds one and sends it around the moon with people? Did Musk and the govt collaborate or what?

[-] Balex@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Considering this has been many, many years in the making, I don't get how you could come to the conclusion that this was a "fuck you" to SpaceX. And calling Starship a shitty rocket just further shows you're a little biased in your assessment of the situation.

[-] CatalpaRed@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 week ago

Yes, I am biased. Fuck Elon Musk and his shitty-rocket-embezzlement-scheme SpaceX.

[-] athatet@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 week ago

For real. A single person should not have enough money for their own goddamn space program. It’s ludicrous.

[-] Balex@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

SpaceX isn't the first company to be making rockets. Who do you think has been making NASA's rockets? I'll give you a hint: it's not NASA.

And Elon started SpaceX way before me was the richest person in the world. You can hate Elon Musk. I'd even agree with your hate there. But to direct it at SpaceX and accuse them as just being a money-making-scheme for Elon is a little ridiculous.

[-] WesternInfidels@feddit.online 1 points 2 weeks ago

One of the criticisms of the Artemis program is that NASA's SLS rocket is Titantically, catastrophically expensive compared to SpaceX rockets. Or compared to the Saturn IV rocket. Compared to just about everything.

Artemis III is supposed to involve a commercially-made moon lander, probably from SpaceX. Artemis IV is supposed to build a space station in lunar orbit, on the back of about a zillion SpaceX rocket launches.

I don't know everything, but I don't think NASA's in any position to tell Elon Musk off.

Grain of salt: Most of what I think I know about Artemis is from a very long, very detailed, very critical and persuasive blog post by someone who isn't even an engineer as far as I know.

this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2026
27 points (100.0% liked)

News

37338 readers
131 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS