58

The U.S. has been quietly building up a set of state-level laws that push operating system providers into the age verification plague.

California's AB 1043, signed in October 2025, requires OS providers to collect age data at account setup and pipe it to apps through a real-time API. It kicks in on January 1, 2027.

Colorado is working on something nearly identical. SB26-051 (which we covered when it was still a proposal) passed the state Senate 28-7 on March 3, 2026, and is now waiting on a House vote to become law there too.

However, these are just state-level laws. A new federal bill, H.R.8250, introduced on April 13, 2026, by Rep. Josh Gottheimer, with Rep. Elise M. Stefanik signing on as cosponsor, has us intrigued.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] unitedwithme@lemmy.today 20 points 6 hours ago

My other biggest gripe: what happens to business computer users at the office? What about their admins? How much extra work is this going to create???

[-] Prove_your_argument@piefed.social 10 points 5 hours ago

Enterprise and SMB always have practical workarounds that consumers do not need to deal with.

The only way to create a local user account on windows 11 now without fuckery is pretending you are going to domain join. No other method exists without under the hood tweaks. A similar workaround would work.

But none of this actually protects kids. The goal is to have total surveillance over as many users as possible in their home life. Enterprise is already handled by m365 and google workspace after all.

[-] Romkslrqusz@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 hours ago

The only way to create a local user account on windows 11 now without fuckery is pretending you are going to domain join. No other method exists without under the hood tweaks. A similar workaround would work.

Depending on your definition of “under the hood”, this isn’t really accurate. You can invoke CMD to create an account or enter Audit mode to do the same. Neither of these methods require preparation of separate installation media.

[-] PabloSexcrowbar@piefed.social 1 points 3 hours ago

Can't you only join a domain on the Pro versions of Windows, too?

[-] unitedwithme@lemmy.today 2 points 4 hours ago

Ohhh trust me I know it's all about surveillance. I'm just meaning they're going to negatively impact everyone everywhere without a second thought because they'll get what they want in the end. Either more money or more reelections

[-] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 1 points 4 hours ago

But I don't use windows 11, still using a local account just fine.

[-] Prove_your_argument@piefed.social 2 points 3 hours ago

I use CachyOS, but for the vanilla home user "I bought a laptop!" at bestbuy or whatever the fuck, there's no local account option anymore. It's connect to the internet and sign in with microsoft, and nag you constantly every 3 days until you activate onedrive and other microsoft services.

I got an ARM64 laptop through work to test to see how it might work as an experiment and this has been how the device behaves from day 1. It's a nightmare.

[-] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 1 points 17 minutes ago* (last edited 17 minutes ago)

Does windows no longer let you use a PC without the internet? I don't normally buy PCs with an OS and install my own on them.

[-] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 15 points 6 hours ago

No worries, all this IT stuff is going away with the banning of VPNs

[-] IllNess@infosec.pub 10 points 5 hours ago

This basically makes using VPNs for privacy useless. Now they will have a record of every IP address you ever used. They can also use local laws internationally. Like if your state has age verification or bans certain sites, they can just use your ID to ban those websites or apps even if you aren't in the country.

This is horribly bad...

[-] Mothra@mander.xyz 4 points 4 hours ago

Can someone ELI5 this for me please? I'm clearly not getting what's going on

[-] t3rmit3@beehaw.org 3 points 2 hours ago

State-level bills have heretofore only required OSes to ask a user if they are of majority age. A federal bill is likely (based on the groups backing and who proposed it) to require OSes to validate (i.e. have users prove, not just assert) their ages.

Depending on what mechanisms are mandated, and who they target punishment at, it could lock 99% of users (who are not willing or capable to use means to bypass this) into tying all their actions online to a government-run database.

It's not enough that means to bypass it exist; the government shouldn't be able to mandate this kind of control, and shouldn't be propagating the expectation that this behavior and level of control is normal or acceptable.

[-] IllNess@infosec.pub 6 points 3 hours ago

This bill, if passed, will force operating systems to verify the age of the user. This means the verification uses a government issued ID.

[-] Mothra@mander.xyz 1 points 3 hours ago

It's the mechanism apparently being impossible to be cheated on what I don't understand. Or maybe I'm just hopelessly confused.

I should have replied under the post instead of under your comment, but it was your comment the one triggering the oh wait what moment for me, sorry. Don't feel like you have to give me an answer if I'm not making any sense

this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2026
58 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

42718 readers
521 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS