50
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by ooli3@sopuli.xyz to c/gaming@beehaw.org

ITT I learn that oligarch gabe nawel is the elon musk of gamers

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] MissingGhost@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago

Which of the other launchers have or are compatible with proton/wine?

[-] Banzai51@midwest.social 5 points 1 week ago

Not a monopoly. Only people mad at Steam are competitors. Competitors focus on shareholders, Steam focuses on gamers, you know, their customers.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] athatet@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 week ago

No it isn’t.

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 week ago

Weren't they literally being sued over it?

[-] furrowsofar@beehaw.org 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Great. Any time someone has a successful business that supports Linux somehow it is just terrible. I always wonder if these are these real people or just FUD from competitors trying to max Linux support undesirable. Sure I prefer FOSS, but I'm also happy there is some commercial game support. Maybe I'll use it some day, maybe I won't.

[-] angstylittlecatboy@reddthat.com 3 points 1 week ago

They are, but they're good to the end user, so people don't care to complain.

[-] Newsteinleo@infosec.pub 4 points 1 week ago

I don't think they, there is nothing stoping anyone from selling their game through another means. It's possible to build your own website, take credit card payment, and distribute a game that way. People don't do that because it whole lot of extra work and it's easier to pay some 30% commission to sell it for you.

[-] Lemmert@reddthat.com 3 points 1 week ago

I'm severely alarmed by the amount of people arguing whether or not Steam is a monopoly. You don't need 100% of market share to have monopoly position. Pure monopolies are extremely rare and are almost always state-run companies like for public transport. No anti-monopoly legislation is written in a way to only break up firms with literally 0 competition.

[-] blindbunny@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago

Capitalist removed about monopoly is real rich.

[-] FireXtol@piefed.social 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Wtf? You can pretty much play any game on steam without steam....

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 2 points 1 week ago

I don't care that Steam has an effective monopoly on digital games. That's fine. Games can and are on many other services for PC, but gamers want them on Steam. Fine. Whatever. You can even buy games from other services, get Steam codes, and use them as if you got them from Steam, even though Steam get no money from that sale. That's amazing. Really.

But.

They killed the idea that you can own a PC game. I mean legally own it, be able to sell your copy of it to another person, and no longer have it yourself. You could do that with physical. You still can with physical console games. But on PC that concept is dead. It's not coming back. And Valve did that. You now just rent them. Fine, you think, Valve isn't going anywhere. But one day Valve will be gone, and this will matter. No king rules forever.

And the least said about lootboxes and hats and all that scummy crap the better.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2026
50 points (67.1% liked)

Gaming

34671 readers
174 users here now

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS