263
submitted 1 year ago by Roman0@lemmy.world to c/android@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FabulousCable3945@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] illumrial@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Now make SD cards mandatory and you've got something really good.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] boo@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

I do miss being able to swap out a phone battery and this will certainly be a step in the right direction in terms ewaste and device longevity.

One thing that I wonder about is waterproofing or water resistance. Some phones are basically waterproof in shallow water. How achievable is this with a device with a trivial way to remove the battery?

[-] HubbleST@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The Galaxy S5 sport had a battery door and water resistance. They just used gaskets.

[-] HisDufusness@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago

They can just seal the rest of the components exposing just a connection for the battery. There were water resistant phones before, the major reason they decided to make the battery unremovable was to make people buy new phones. Nobody wants to charge their phones multiple times a day.

[-] rms1990@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

People make this argument and barely anyone really uses the waterprooding features of a phone

[-] PlutoParty@programming.dev 6 points 1 year ago

I imagine water resistance comes in handy quite often for many people. It has certainly saved me countless times. Not that I need to go swimming or deep sea diving with my phone, but I have dropped phones in water, been stuck in the rain, spilled a glass of water, etc. I ruined many phones before it became common.

[-] AmberPrince@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Water proofing is for more than just taking it underwater though. It's also for getting caught in the rain, leaving it on a bathroom counter while you shower, or accidentally dropping it in a puddle.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] arkonis@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

You don't ever really 'need to use' the waterproof feature on your phone. It's more insurance for most people.

I have personally known dozens of people for who'm it's saved their phone including:

  • Dropped it in the toilet.
  • Dropped in pool.
  • Dropped it in the bath.
  • Bag flooded when water bottle broke.
  • Flooded when coffee cup failed.
  • Rained out.
  • Pouring rain on a bike ride.
  • Pouring rain when needed GPS on motorcycles.

The above are things that happened both to people I know individually and also all of the above have happened to be at some point.

I don't necessarily like the lack of being able to swap out the batteries for a cheap replacement but I do like that waterproofing to a high degree should be a default feature for things like phones. It could be argued to get waterproof cases or keep it in a bag and that's all good and well (except the waterproof cases as they suck and break) but isn't it nice for the default to be that the device itself is waterproof if that was an option?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] connelhooley@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Although this is obviously a step in the right direction it needs to be followed up with security updates, no point increasing the life of the hardware without doing the same for the software.

[-] Emerald_Earth@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Making it illegal to lock bootloaders would make each device community-maintainable.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Wander@yiffit.net 6 points 1 year ago

Hooray! Younger generations will finally be able to experience the joy of dropping their phone and having to pick up three to four different pieces! /s

(I'm all for this change, by the way)

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] M_Reimer@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

And now they just have to force manufacturers to either at least security patch devices for, let's say 10 years, or force them to open source everything the community needs to continue supporting this device. It never happened to me that the battery died before support ended.

Just had that issue with my Pixel 3a XL. No more security updates. Had to replace it with a Pixel 6a but I liked the 3a XL more. It there was any community support for the 3a XL, I would rather sell my 6a again.

[-] abhibeckert@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

As an Apple user, I definitely have batteries die before the product stops being useful. The company provides feature updates for old phones for several years, and when that runs out they continue to provide security patches for several more years.

A new iPhone battery is only $47 (if you do the repair yourself, and if you send your old battery back to Apple for a recycling credit), but it's a pretty complex and arduous process with a fair chance of damaging your phone while attempting it. You also have to pay a deposit, over a thousand dollars, to rent the tools off Apple. Ouch.

You can take it to an Apple store, but that takes even longer than doing the repair yourself. And it costs more (though you don't have to pay the outrageous deposit for the tools).

This legislation would force Apple to make it a simple process with no tools. Yes please.

[-] Graphine@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Honestly, with Apple making it incredibly fucking hard to take out their batteries with excessive amounts of glue, I'm okay with this.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Doodoocaca@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Misleading title. Phones can still be glued. Waterproof phones still don't need to have a user replaceable battery (the battery needs to be replaceable but by professionals).

[-] pimterry@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Do you have a reference for that? From all the documentation I've seen elsewhere, that's not true. There's no exclusion for waterproof devices, and everything has to be possible with tools a normal person can buy (you might need to go to a local hardware store, but no unique specialist expensive kit).

The full law is here: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2020/0798/COM_COM(2020)0798_EN.pdf. It only mentions 'water' 3 times and none of them relate to waterproof phones (they're talking about batteries of waterbourne transport & environmental impact of water use) so I don't know where that's coming from.

It's totally possible to make waterproof phones with removable batteries - Samsung did it with the Galaxy S5 (IP67 - 1 meter under water for 30 minutes) way back in 2014 and there's lots of other examples. It's just not quite as cheap as glueing everything together.

[-] boff@lemmy.one 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Thank you for linking the text. For anyone wondering, here is Ch. 2, Article 11 regarding portable battery replacement:

Article 11 Removability and replaceability of portable batteries

  1. Portable batteries incorporated in appliances shall be readily removable and replaceable by the end-user or by independent operators during the lifetime of the appliance, if the batteries have a shorter lifetime than the appliance, or at the latest at the end of the lifetime of the appliance. A battery is readily replaceable where, after its removal from an appliance, it can be substituted by a similar battery, without affecting the functioning or the performance of that appliance.
  2. The obligations set out in paragraph 1 shall not apply where (a) continuity of power supply is necessary and a permanent connection between the appliance and the portable battery is required for safety, performance, medical or data integrity reasons; or (b) the functioning of the battery is only possible when the battery is integrated into the structure of the appliance.
  3. The Commission shall adopt guidance to facilitate harmonised application of the derogations set out in paragraph 2
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] thesanewriter@vlemmy.net 5 points 1 year ago

If this goes through, I think it would be really good news. Battery failure is one of the leading things that force people to replace their smartphones, and having them be replaceable would go a long way towards making smartphones last longer.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] quortez@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Fingers crossed that this will be implemented well, im tired of having sleek electronics be irrelevant in 2 years when the silicon could go for 5 or six

[-] j4k3@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The silicon could go on for decades if both the modem and processor were fully documented hardware that the community can access and support in the Linux kernel.

I can run a secure and current form of Linux on 30+ year old hardware if I want to, because the hardware documentation was expected by everyone at the time even if some end users were oblivious to what this meant. The whole reason google pushes Android is because they provide a base Linux kernel that hardware manufacturers can easily slip their proprietary junk into without requiring them to add the kind of open source code needed for mainline kernel support by the community. This is the mechanism that depreciates your device. It is totally artificial and an end user exploitation by design.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] variouslegumes@reddthat.com 4 points 1 year ago

My last phone bit the dust because I made the mistake of taking it apart to repair it. It became a gluey piece of garbage. If I want it be waterproof I'll stick it in a sandwich bag. Or maybe the manufacturer can use the novel tech of gaskets.

[-] scarabic@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I can’t wait to hear the Apple marketing word for this feature. They’ll add some gimmick like the battery is held in with magnets and say “We call it MagPack and we think you’re going to love it.”

[-] RarePepeCollector@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Just as long as it doesn't resemble what the poors would use. Yuck.

[-] howarddo@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago
[-] hyorvenn@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Fairphone 3 user here. My main reason to choose this phone a few years ago was because the battery could easily be replaced. Too many phones are perfectly functional but the battery is half dead. Another boon of non-glued batteries : You can carry two (or more) batteries to easily switch when the first one is KO. Meaning no need for portable charger and useless cables in your pocket. Phone at 10% ? Just change it, bam 100% in a second. Easy as that.

I'll probably not be the target of such regulations because I wouldn't choose an anti-consumer phone brand anyway, but at least it's going in the right direction.

[-] NightOwl@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Phones are getting more expensive so people are holding on to them longer, so it's a nice quality of life improvement to remove the barriers to battery replacement so less people have to go down to a phone repair store to get it changed. The more of a hassle battery replacement is seen the more likely people are to just upgrade and create e-waste.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] xfts@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

W move for the EU. Very glad they're mandating stuff that should have been common place to begin with (ex. USB C on iPhones).

[-] konalt@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I actually love all these regulations on smartphones (mainly by the EU), like the recent USB-C standard. That one in particular makes it so much easier to share chargers around the house!

[-] deaf_fish@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

As a USA citizen, thanks EU for making our cellphone companies not be dick's.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] xtract@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

It might lead to thicker phones, but battery and/or SW obsolescence are the main reasons I have been swapping phone in the last 10 years.

[-] Reygle@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Back in the day when I had a Samsung S4, I bought this massive brick of a battery/new back plate and I LOVED it. Absolutely worth being a bit thick.

[-] Simplificity@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

right to repair LETS GOOO

[-] Nerrad@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Good. I haven't been able to replace a battery since my S4.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2023
263 points (97.8% liked)

Android

28045 readers
16 users here now

DROID DOES

Welcome to the droidymcdroidface-iest, Lemmyest (Lemmiest), test, bestest, phoniest, pluckiest, snarkiest, and spiciest Android community on Lemmy (Do not respond)! Here you can participate in amazing discussions and events relating to all things Android.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules


1. All posts must be relevant to Android devices/operating system.


2. Posts cannot be illegal or NSFW material.


3. No spam, self promotion, or upvote farming. Sources engaging in these behavior will be added to the Blacklist.


4. Non-whitelisted bots will be banned.


5. Engage respectfully: Harassment, flamebaiting, bad faith engagement, or agenda posting will result in your posts being removed. Excessive violations will result in temporary or permanent ban, depending on severity.


6. Memes are not allowed to be posts, but are allowed in the comments.


7. Posts from clickbait sources are heavily discouraged. Please de-clickbait titles if it needs to be submitted.


8. Submission statements of any length composed of your own thoughts inside the post text field are mandatory for any microblog posts, and are optional but recommended for article/image/video posts.


Community Resources:


We are Android girls*,

In our Lemmy.world.

The back is plastic,

It's fantastic.

*Well, not just girls: people of all gender identities are welcomed here.


Our Partner Communities:

!android@lemmy.ml


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS