82
all 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] einsteinx2@programming.dev 41 points 1 year ago

I’m glad they shut it down. An inaccurate tool is worse than no tool, especially if teachers are using it to check student essays and punishing students for false positives…

Even just more generally, people were trusting these detection tools not realizing how inaccurate they were, which causes huge problems both due to false positives and false negatives. Better to remove the useless tools now and work on a better solution, if one is even possible which I’m not sure it is.

[-] ExperimentalGuy@programming.dev 0 points 1 year ago

I read the article and was like huh, I'm kinda sad that they shut it down, but I really appreciate it point. I've been wondering a lot ab how this will effect academics and frankly, like most things nowadays, just seems futile.

[-] Peregrinus@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

positive outcome, it was misleading at best and causing people to be given poor grades or employment issues at worst. I'm sure others here tried to use it, I found it couldn't detect raw chatgpt 3.5 copy and pasted. it was worse when I asked it to use British English etc.

this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
82 points (94.6% liked)

Programming

17314 readers
241 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS