1056
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by LazaroFilm@lemmy.film to c/mildlyinfuriating@lemmy.world

I kept burning my food or wait forever for the pan to heat up and I finally understand why. Each knob has a different direction for the Hi and Lo (also why isn’t it Low).

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] danc4498@lemmy.world 145 points 1 year ago

You'll love it more when the numbers get washed off. Here's mine.

[-] mrmhm@lemmy.world 64 points 1 year ago

How in the hell did this make it to market?

[-] beta@lemmy.blahaj.zone 47 points 1 year ago

Mass consumerism and companies not caring.

[-] Wrench@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago

Their target audiences are home flippers who just need the cheapest stainless steel appliances that look fine at a glance, and cheap landlords that don't understand that they're choosing themselves more money in the long run.

[-] danielton@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't get how this would be cheaper to manufacture. They'd need to make five different switches.

[-] Lev_Astov@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

By knobs, you mean rotary switches, I assume. I think the thing is they cheaped out by not designing the switches they needed. Instead they just sourced whatever rotary switches they could find that had the number of outputs they needed for these weird, segmented burners, regardless of their potentiometer directions.

load more comments (1 replies)

Oh God, playing Russian Roulette with your food using that knob.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Crackhappy@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Haha yeah. I have the same one from Samsung.

[-] Ilikepornaddict@lemmynsfw.com 9 points 1 year ago

Samsung makes shit home appliances.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] sndmn@lemmy.ca 115 points 1 year ago

My dryer has a "less dry" setting.

Who likes their laundry done rare?

[-] LazaroFilm@lemmy.film 97 points 1 year ago

That actually makes sense for things you want to finish drying on a line so they don’t heat up too much and shrink.

[-] manucode@infosec.pub 52 points 1 year ago
[-] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 61 points 1 year ago

Also for if you enjoy the feeling of cold damp underwear.

[-] snooggums@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago

Cold damp underwear sucks.

Cold damp socks on the other foot...

[-] Ambiorickx@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

I’m trying to picture wearing a sock on one foot, and underwear on the other…

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago

It's so hard to grow fungi otherwise

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] danc4498@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

This makes sense... But my washer defaults to this mode and I can't figure out how to change it. By default all my clothes are almost dry.

[-] Kushan@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

Mine has similar settings but they're named in ways which actually tells you why you'd want them that way: "Ready to Iron", "Ready to Hang" and "Extra Dry", things like that.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] warling@lemmy.world 67 points 1 year ago

At least “Off” is consistent. That could have been a total train wreck.

[-] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I bought a portable electric space heater a few years ago that had an alarming tendency to rewire itself - like, "Off" would become "Low", "High" would become "Fan" etc. Finally took it apart and realized that the dial was just a contact that rolled across a bit of printed solder and occasionally the solder would melt (no way they could have expected that to happen in a fucking heater) and flow into a new pattern. I have absolutely no idea why thousands of people haven't burned themselves to death with these things.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] sebinspace@lemmy.world 58 points 1 year ago

mildly?

This is fucking pitchfork worthy

[-] Pandantic@kbin.social 51 points 1 year ago

It's like your stove top was the experimental test one where you could see how all the knob styles worked, like it wasn't supposed to be released to the public.

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 33 points 1 year ago

You have double burners. Some of your knobs have two HI and two LO positions, one for one burner and one for both burners.

On top of the stove this looks like two concentric heating elements. You can turn on one or both. Turning on both is sometimes called a “fast boil” burner.

The best solution the industry has come up with is to put two control surfaces into one knob, so instead of the control surface being a full circle it’s a half circle.

There’s no way to make all the knobs match in appearance unless all the burners have optional double burner operation.

source: am appliance salesman.

[-] LazaroFilm@lemmy.film 11 points 1 year ago

Yes they’re double burners but the Lo -> Hi rotation is different for each position which is infuriating, but only mildly.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Kushan@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm really trying to understand what's going on here in a way that makes sense, even if it's a twisted kind of sense.

My best guess is that each of these burners are a different size and some have multiple rings and that by turning the knob left (Anti-clockwise), you're going from smaller number of rings to larger number of rings - however, the rings start at their highest heat level. So looking at the bottom right dial as an example, the first "Notch" on the left is the smallest burner on the highest setting, then as you turn left more, it'll dial down that burner until you get to the second ring on the burner - starting at full power for that second burner and continuing to lower power until you get to the 3rd ring, then it's same again for the 4th ring.

Is that right? am I even close? I don't understand why you'd go from smallest burner to highest burner anti-clockwise, but go from lowest burner-power to highest clockwise. That still doesn't make sense to me.

[-] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's pretty much exactly how it is.

OP's stove is GCRE3060AF, or similar. The rightmost knob is inconsistent for reasons I cannot fathom, unless there is some obscure electrical reason. It is an electric stove, and the knobs with multiple ranges do indeed control burners that have multiple potential sizes. One of them has two selectable sizes, and other has three. On these I believe the rationale is that the high setting is the closest and most easily accessible because radiant electric ranges suck [citation not needed] and since they take forever and a day to heat up most users will just leap right to the full blast output setting immediately. I have no idea why the direction on the last knob is backwards from the others, clockwise versus counterclockwise, but it is.

If you're morbidly curious, you can view the entire control panel from OP's stove (or one similar) here.

[-] LazaroFilm@lemmy.film 14 points 1 year ago
[-] Mozingo@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

Lmao, sneaky reflection bird

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] papabobolious@feddit.nu 10 points 1 year ago

Also seems mildly infuriating to reach across whatever you are cooking to handle the knobs.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] LazaroFilm@lemmy.film 13 points 1 year ago

Yep. It’s. GCRE3060AFF electric stove. (Other thing I hate is the fan noise when the oven is on, even when not on convection). Your idea of Hi closest to off position makes sense except of that triple knob, the 3rd ring Hi position isn’t at the top.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] discusseded@programming.dev 30 points 1 year ago

This looks like an AI-generated fever dream nightmare.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] justlookingfordragon@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago

The longer I stare at it, the worse it gets ...

[-] KidDogDad@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago
[-] scutiger@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The burner has two zones. A small one in the middle, and a wider ring around. If you turn to the left, you only turn the middle part on from High to low, and if you turn right, you turn both on from low to high.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] june@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Has to do with the fact that several burners have multiple sizes that can be used. My stove is the same way, and there’s really not a much better way to do it imo, short of a touch screen, which I don’t want on a stove.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] spongebue@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

I can explain this one! When the knob only has one set of hi/lo, it controls the burner's heat as you'd expect, and it all works in the same direction. Those with multiple hi/lo sets control the heat and the size of the burner, since there are 2 (and on one, maybe 3?) concentric heating elements available for that knob.

I've had something similar for years, and have never had an issue. I'm even less likely to accidentally choose the wrong knob since the single-size one tends to have a looser feel to it.

[-] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 12 points 1 year ago

Traslation: you get used to weird design.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Vub@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

This is maybe the worst thing I have seen in my life.

[-] Zoldyck@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 22 points 1 year ago

WTF, they're all different?

[-] Carter@feddit.uk 18 points 1 year ago

Lo for the same reason it's hi and not high.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] LillianVS@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

That should be illegal, throw it out

[-] jerrimu@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Ohhh, that’s just a left-handed stove.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] BearPear@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

My brain is on fire seeing this

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] NegativeLookBehind@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago

"Which one should we put on the stove?"

"Yes."

[-] ultratiem@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago

Please stop, he’s already dead….

[-] SafetyGoggles@feddit.de 10 points 1 year ago

Using "Low" would be more infuriating than "Lo".

The full words are "High" (not "Hi") and "Low", so to save space they use the first two letters "Hi" and "Lo". If they use "Hi" and "Low" it would be inconsistent, e.g. more infuriating.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] RushingSquirrel@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Last one is the only one that's out of place to me. They all have counter clockwise when solo mode, when 2 modes available, low is at the bottom and high is at the top, makes sense, but the last one is different.

Also, why would it be Low? They're using 2 letters, Hi and Lo are different enough to identify. I'd have to check mine, but using Hi/Lo seems normal.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2023
1056 points (96.9% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35455 readers
285 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS