186
all 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] IamRoot@sh.itjust.works 38 points 11 months ago

This could be good. If the Republicans are forced to vote on this then it will demonstrate that they are all full of bs and are just letting Tuberville take the heat for what they all support.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 4 points 11 months ago

What difference do you expect that to make?

[-] June@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

It puts the GOP squarely in the position of not supporting the military rather than just one radical holdout.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 3 points 11 months ago

Yeah but how many votes would that charge? Republican voters will excuse anything their politicians do. They only care about identity, not policy.

[-] June@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago

It’s less about changing votes and more about exposing them for what they are and forcing some measure of intellectual honesty. It’s not something that fixes anything near term but sets up how the party is perceived in the future. The more they are exposed for not standing for what they claim to stand for, the better.

[-] InLikeClint@kbin.social 38 points 11 months ago

I still can't believe a former mid college football coach is holding back these promotions to wait on orange Hitler to fill them with his fascist yes men.

[-] cmbabul@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

I still am upset and disappointed that the state of Alabama elected a former college football coach that wasn’t Nick Saban.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago

The Rules Committee on Tuesday advanced a resolution that would allow military nominations to be confirmed en masse

Oh good. I was worried their solution would be the usual one: outright capitulation, calling it a compromise, and ordering their voters to be happy with it.

this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2023
186 points (96.0% liked)

politics

19136 readers
3800 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS