27
submitted 10 months ago by cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca to c/games@lemmy.world
all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 19 points 10 months ago

Not my cup of tea for the price. It's the same price as a switch lite and you need a ps5 to use it, and you need to be on the same physical network too...

[-] echo64@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

When I use my switch, 99.9% of the time, I'm at home. So, none of this actually matters to me.

I got one, and it's pretty great. It does the job super well. Let's me play games whilst the TV is in use, which I think is 99% of the reason I use my switch portable too.

[-] garretble@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Does it feel less laggy than the PS app?

[-] echo64@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

https://imgur.com/a/EIT9pow it's as close to zero lag as you can reasonably expect

[-] garretble@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Oh wow, nice. I didn’t know that it would also mirror on the screen. That’s cool.

I’ve tried the app on a good iPad, and I think what most people don’t realize is that that’s capped at 30fps plus there’s the tiniest bit of added lag because of the Bluetooth connection — both things you don’t get with this device. I mean it obviously works on iPad or a phone, but this thing seems to play games better, and sometimes you just want to sit on the porch or something or in a hammock and play something, you know?

[-] atrielienz@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Yeah. Steamlink has been a thing for ages. I even still have a physical steamlink box somewhere in storage. Same premise, somewhat nicer execution.

[-] ekZepp@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago
[-] Holyginz@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

I'm already able to use remote play on my laptop which is only slightly less convenient and can work outside of my home. Why would I want to spend so much for a mobile option that isn't very mobile?

[-] mojo@lemm.ee 11 points 10 months ago
[-] Stovetop@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

People who are too poor for more than 1 TV to play games on but rich enough to buy another 1/2 of a PS5 to keep gaming when someone else wants to use the TV.

Edit: Also people who thought the Wii U was a good idea.

[-] echo64@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

You set up two tvs in your living room?

[-] Stovetop@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

You keep the PS5 wherever you want, and then when someone says they want to use the TV, you tell them to fuck off and go use the other one

[-] echo64@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

You must be a joy to live with

[-] Stovetop@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

I'm amazing to live with.

[-] atrielienz@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Parents would be my guess. Who don't want a TV or gaming system in a kids room but would like to allow them to play games while a sibling or parent is using the TV.

this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2023
27 points (81.4% liked)

Games

31804 readers
1249 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS