85
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by mondoman712@lemmy.ml to c/fuck_cars@lemmy.ml

He's also said he's "on the motorists' side" and plans to restrict councils from imposing 20mph speed limits.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Nobug404@geddit.social 30 points 1 year ago

Fuck Rishi Sunak. Make his wife pay her taxes. He shouldn't be an MP let alone PM.

[-] lntl@lemmy.sdf.org 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Fuck this guy and his car

[-] MediaActivist@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 year ago

It's almost as if the prime minister himself was a selfish billionaire or something. Oh wait!

[-] CouldntCareBear@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 year ago

They think they're onto a good thing after their suprise by-election victory, credited to the unpopularity of the expansion of London's ultra low emission zone. Now watch as Rishi flyers with rolling back every single environmentally progressive policy of the last 50 years for a handful of votes.

Still, they're onto a loser there. The environment and climate change is a big concern for voters these days, and frankly they're already uncredible in that department. What little reputation they have will get easily be damaged.

[-] oo1@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

I'm not so sure about that.
they care more about swing voters in swing constituencies - not people in general.

i think there are plenty of swing voters who might be mildly bothered about the environment, but many can be made to fear losing their cars more with the right rhetoric.

I think they'll bet that most of the people turned off by that were never going to flip to tory anyway.

I'd also not put too much stock in opinion polls on that matter - they're just not a very good measure. sure 50/60/70% of voters may say they care about the environment when asked a question with nothing at stake. but would they actually vote to get rid of their car or for higher fuel taxes; or even just to invest public money into public transport services.

@oo1 @mondoman712 @CouldntCareBear Yes but the stuff about ULEZ is largely fear-mongering. It will be completely irrelevant in a year's time. Most of the people worried about it won't actually be affected by it. And across London as a whole it's pretty popular.

There is plenty of historical experience across many countries on this. They're initially seen as possibly a good idea, then as it gets closer, people panic, then they get enacted, then people get used to them and *mostly* support them.

@oo1 @mondoman712 @CouldntCareBear As regards the wider picture, I agree that some demographics / constituencies have *way* more influence than others because of first past the post, and our politics diverges dramatically from what people actually think. People are much less cruel and bigoted, on the whole, than our current politics suggests. Politicians know this but only care about the marginal constituencies, or more often their own leadership ambitions in a soon to be smaller and out of office party.

Practically speaking, plenty of people drive because public transport isn't available or is expensive. A small investment in buses, combined with modest deterrents such as ULEZ, could shift a significant number of drivers. But to get to where we need to be - 70%+ fewer miles driven - we'll have to solve a lot of other problems e.g. housing, trains, etc.

[-] favrion@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

He likes watching the world burn.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2023
85 points (98.9% liked)

Fuck Cars

9675 readers
33 users here now

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don't use slurs. You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don't post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS