4
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Th4tGuyII@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I respect stylistic choices as much as the next guy, but capping the game's FPS to 30 seemingly completely arbitrarily is stupid design, especially on PC where most people want 60 minimum.

[-] FantasticFox@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

I don't get the controversy over 30fps. Like I played RDR2 at 30fps and didn't even notice it.

The gameplay itself is far more important and on that front Bethesda has been second to none. There isn't even one single game that comes close to what they have achieved in The Elder Scrolls. Kingdom Come: Deliverance was close but much smaller in scope (which makes sense given the size of the studio).

I've played every single one of their games since Morrowind and while Fallout 76 was a flop and Fallout 4 was perhaps a bit disappointing, at least without DLC, almost all of their games have been incredible.

In Todd we trust.

[-] Toribor@corndog.uk 2 points 1 year ago

30fps is not a stylistic choice, it's due to hardware limitations. A higher framerate with no motion blur is preferable in nearly all circumstances.

Sure you 'get used to it', but I could say the same thing for playing games while in a room with a strobe light flashing in my eyes. Yeah my gaming experience isn't materially different, but I'd be a lot more comfortable in better circumstances.

Once you're used to higher framerates, 30fps is a big downgrade, with motion blur smearing things around to keep it from looking like a slideshow.

[-] sneezycat@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

The minimum requirements for this game are very high,,and that's for running it at 30fps. Add that AAA always have problems at release + it's Bethesda... So I bet the game is going to run terribly.

(Also I'd rather have 60fps and last gen graphics than 30fps for a game with shooting and fast-paced action)

[-] notun@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Good performance is what allows good gameplay to shine. 30 fps might be fine for you, but anyone playing on PC with M&K will attest that 60 fps is the bare minimum.

[-] j_erasmo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

As long as it's a consistent 30 fps, then I am fine with this decision.

Tears of the Kingdom has convinced me that as long as the performance is consistent, the only thing that matters is the gameplay.

But it is Bethesda we are talking about here lol.

[-] Dandroid@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

What exactly do you mean by your Tears of the Kingdom comment? That game was constantly dropping frames. Any time you used ultrahand or fuse, the game would drop to <15 fps. I still really enjoyed the game despite that, but the performance was really poor and inconsistent. Breath of the Wild had similar issues, but it felt less severe. Or maybe I'm misremembering, since it has been 6 years since I played BotW on the switch.

[-] richisawesome@mstdn.games 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

@Dandroid @j_erasmo TOTK runs at a locked 60fps at native 4k for me. Yuzu emulator through to my TV, using a Switch Pro controller with gyro. Fuck playing it on the switch.

[-] sylver_dragon@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

I have to wonder if part of the reason is that even the upgraded engine still struggles with physics at higher frame rates. Skyrim had issues with objects not playing well with higher FPS. 30fps may just be a sweet spot for the engine that it looks "good enough" and doesn't struggle to keep objects settled in the ground.

this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2023
4 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

19991 readers
52 users here now

Sub for any gaming related content!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS