Japan’s Long Stagnation Is a Case Study for the Future of Western Capitalism (jacobin.com)

submitted 1 year ago by Swarming@sh.itjust.works to c/politics@lemmy.world

16 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 14 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] Lenins2ndCat@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And Britain's empire the larger case study that comes before that.

Excellent.

[-] HubertManne@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago

Despite peoples opinion on the source I find japan does seem to lead the way on economic and social issues myself.

[-] tiredofsametab@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

lead the way on [...] social issues

Sure, as long as you're straight, male, and Japanese. To a lesser extent if you are straight, female, and Japanese (but don't dare expect the same salary, high-level positions, or being treated like anything other than someone who will quit to be a stay-at-home-mom at the vast majority of companies). Everything else is going to have a very different experience in terms of equality in society.

Edit: also bullying issues, including still some people whom even have ancestors of a certain group/caste (burakkumin, for one), homeless issues, mental health care not being covered by insurance, and still more.

[-] HubertManne@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago

yeah and we are seeing this in other countries. this is what I mean by lead the way. Not doing a bang up job but more speed running compared to the rest of the world.

[+] EnderWi99in@kbin.social -18 points 1 year ago

Slow but steady growth that outpaces inflation is kind of the ideal. The US also doesn't have the population issues Japan has. The Jacobian is also far left garbage. Why is this even posted here?

[-] nyar@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Of course, with that user name, you'd think that Jacobin, a barely left of center magazine, is far left garbage.

[-] motorheadkusanagi@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'll back you up on this. Both points.

The thing most people forget about capitalism is that Adam Smith's invisible hand, eg the consumers, was meant to bend companies towards their will. Smith wrote a whole book on how important morality is too.

As soon as the land of any country has all become private property, the landlords, like all other men, love to reap where they never sowed, and demand a rent even for its natural produce.

No society can surely be flourishing and happy, of which the far greater part of the members are poor and miserable.

The disposition to admire, and almost to worship, the rich and the powerful, and to despise, or, at least, to neglect persons of poor and mean condition is the great and most universal cause of the corruption of our moral sentiments.

His ideas got wildly corrupted after WW2 by those looking to resist the potential for new hitlers, and they took it WAY too far... It was never meant to become anarchy for corporations, but if you ask a typical boomer, raised in the overpropagandized post WW2 era, that's what it has become.

Younger folks dont have to continue that boomer shit. We can go back to the original ideas of a decentralized economic system where consumers bend corporations to their will

It's worth looking up who the Jacobins were, btw...

They cut the heads off the French leaders during the revolution and that lead directly to Napoleon's rise, and he was a lot worse than what we got with Trump.

[-] Poob@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

There were company stores, child labor, and pinkertons before WW2, I'm not sure where you're getting the idea that it was all peachy before 1945.

load more comments

this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2023

98 points (93.8% liked)

politics

19089 readers

1878 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News