49
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by aCosmicWave@lemm.ee to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

It really grinds my gears when there’s an c/asklemmy question and the top most responses are single word answers.

For example, a question asking for the most mind-bending movie will often have the same few movies upvoted to the top (“The Matrix”, “Inception”, “Finding Nemo 2”, etc).

Those truly might be the most popular mind-bending movies, but what I really want to know is why the person answering the question feels the way that they do. Otherwise these types of questions can become stale very quickly, as can be seen on other platforms.

Thoughts?

top 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] peter@feddit.uk 105 points 2 years ago
[-] outbound@lemmy.ca 24 points 2 years ago
[-] collegefurtrader@discuss.tchncs.de 32 points 2 years ago
[-] empireOfLove@lemmy.one 31 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

You're asking for a much more intense "quality control" kind of moderation that is one of the reasons Reddit is sinking. That's asking for a lot more mod actions, which is a lot more time spent moderating, and also results in some degree of subjective application of rules for "quality". Heavy mod workloads and subjective decisions tends to drive good, well-balanced mods away (they have actual lives to lead with less time to mod) and only attracts the shitstains with nothing better to do who mod for their own personal power.

Downvote a comment if it isn't contributory. That's what the button is for (not a "I disagree").

Edit: also many of those one word answers spawn a lot of good discussion underneath them. So they're not always totally worthless

[-] aCosmicWave@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

There's no way to add an automated rule -> if c/asklemmy then comment should have 5 words minimum else don't allow reply?

[-] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 10 points 2 years ago

No no no no no.

[-] muddybulldog@mylemmy.win 2 points 2 years ago

There’s not even a way to count words at this juncture never mind anything resembling a rules engine.

[-] atlasraven31@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

If() comment<5 words;

 Ban user

Else();

Post comment
[-] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 3 points 2 years ago

That’s what the button is for (not a “I disagree”).

You know, maybe we just need more than one button.

"Does not contribute to the discussion", "I disagree", "I don't necessarily disagree but this person aligns to a different political ideology and therefore I feel the need to object to their presence in some way"...

[-] atlasraven31@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

As long as they answer the OP, they're valid. It's up to others to ask follow up questions, if they want more discussion.

[-] treadful@lemmy.zip 26 points 2 years ago
[-] meta_synth@yiffit.net 18 points 2 years ago
[-] bermuda@beehaw.org 16 points 2 years ago

I think a question that gets 1-word answers is not a well written question.

Your question can be a yes or no but it'll only generate valuable discussion if you ad "and why"

[-] keeb420@kbin.social 15 points 2 years ago
[-] hsl@wayfarershaven.eu 14 points 2 years ago

I don't have a particularly strong opinion - my first thought is that it conflicts with "loosely moderated". If people have upvoted an answer, I'm happy to let that stand.

[-] James@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

You want descriptive answers? Make a descriptive question.

It can be as simple as 'what is "x" and why?'

[-] aCosmicWave@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago

Missed opportunity for you to say 'what is "x" and y?'

[-] ScorpionFrog@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago
[-] codeskull@ttrpg.network 9 points 2 years ago
[-] TheButtonJustSpins@infosec.pub -1 points 2 years ago

On the one hand, I want to upvote you because funny.

[-] jsveiga@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 years ago
[-] Blizzard@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 years ago
[-] __forward__@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago

If enough people think that a simple "yay" is funny enough to be upvoted near the top it probably is. If it is not upvoted it is not really a problem. Sure they are low-effort comments but in the age of ChatGPT, you can also write low-effort answers that are much longer. It is the voter's responsibility, not the moderator's, to separate interesting posts from non-interesting ones.

[-] luthis@lemmy.nz 6 points 2 years ago

I don't see it being necessary. Good questions will get good answers.

[-] SpaceExplorer@feddit.de 6 points 2 years ago
[-] can@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 years ago

Affirmative

[-] omma@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 years ago

For my part, I prefer precise answers. If I only ask about a film, I don't expect to be told what feelings the film triggers in you or what chips are best to nibble with it. If you want to know that, formulate the question accordingly :)

[-] Karlos_Cantana@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 years ago

"Finding Nemo 2" is a 3 word answer.

[-] aCosmicWave@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago

False. "2" is a number and not a word.

[-] poke@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago

Finding Nemo two

[-] Karlos_Cantana@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 years ago

Then it's a 2 word, and 1 number answer.

[-] favrion@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

False; it's a proper noun encompassing one object.

[-] crowbar@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago
[-] RustedSwitch@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

So downvote those answers, or engage with the commenter in other ways

[-] king_dead@beehaw.org 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Nah. Some questions are so dumb, bad, or tedious that they deserve a curt response. I totally get what youre getting at tho

[-] CookieJarObserver@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago
[-] Dirk@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
[-] oldGregg@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2023
49 points (76.9% liked)

Asklemmy

45129 readers
1779 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS