214
submitted 1 year ago by btp@kbin.social to c/technology@lemmy.ml

Response from Martin Woodward, GitHub's VP of Developer Relations:

Sorry for the inconvenience @koepnick - while searching across all repos has required being logged in for a long time, when we enhanced the search capabilities earlier in the 2023 we had to extend this to repos as well (see https://github.blog/changelog/2023-06-07-code-search-now-requires-login/).

This is primarily to ensure we can support the load for developers on GitHub and help protect the servers from being overwhelmed by anonymous requests from bots etc.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 72 points 1 year ago

Sigh, here we go with the shittyness.

[-] treadful@lemmy.zip 24 points 1 year ago

It's okay. We need to move some shit off GH anyway. They're basically a monopoly on FLOSS code.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] sexy_peach@feddit.de 56 points 1 year ago

Microsoft is terrible. Remember they also require you to use a Microsoft account for Minecraft now. Fuck this company so much

[-] chameleon@kbin.social 29 points 1 year ago

And they're also deleting/deleted all classic Minecraft accounts from before that. They invented an incredibly weird and needlessly obtuse process to extend the migration deadline by 3 months (true final deadline is now mid December 2023), but that's seemingly it. Everyone not paying too much attention to their email just gets $30 worth of game deleted because of a completely arbitrary decision.

[-] can@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

Wait really? I bought it when it entered beta. Do I not own it anymore?

[-] NotSteve_@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

You won't soon if you don't migrate your account

[-] can@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Well that's some bs. I haven't played in a while but the principle of it still bothers me. Especially since I'd have never known if not for reading this thread.

[-] BlueBockser@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

Anyone without access to their old email also loses their account. I don't remember which email address I used with my account back in the day (it's at least ten years old), and since I bought my key from a reseller, I don't have a receipt. Microsofts response was basically "not our problem, guess you'll have to pay us again ¯\_(ツ)_/¯"

[-] beetus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

But this is true for literally anything that requires email verification to login with?

I think msft is scummy here but let's not pretend it's unusual that a company isn't going to help you if you can't access your email to verify your ownership.

If I lose access to my Gmail account and am unable to login to Amazon bc of that Amazon ain't going to help me.

[-] BlueBockser@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago

In Minecraft's case, you never needed the email address beyond initial registration. Login was always through username and password, which I still have. Had I actually forgotten my credentials, that would've been fair, but I didn't. They just suddenly decided that that wasn't enough and they now want some ancient email address that little me had typed in once over ten years ago.

[-] Thcdenton@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

I just let my mincraft license lapse instead of migrating. Fuck em I'll pirate it from now on.

[-] tomjuggler@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Have you tried Minetest? It's pretty good, and not Java based so a lot more lightweight.

[-] glimse@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Wasn't this a pre-microsoft change?

[-] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 43 points 1 year ago

This is primarily to ensure we can support the load for developers on GitHub and help protect the servers from being overwhelmed by anonymous requests from bots etc.

So, Azure's bot protection is crap. Good to know.

[-] satan@r.nf 26 points 1 year ago

People who haven't hosted anything bigger than a two digit daily visitors tells Microsoft how bad their bots protection is.

[-] detalferous@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Google can accommodate billions of searches globally on pages it doesn't control

Microsoft can't index a tiny fraction of that number, even for it's own users.

What a black eye for Microsoft engineering.

[-] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago

TBF going by load times, GitHub search was perpetually on the brink of collapse since well before the Microsoft acquisition. I daren't imagine what the indexes look like.

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Its* own users.

[-] skullgiver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]

[-] TootSweet@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago

I migrated a few code repositories from Github to GitLab literally the same day it was announced that Microsoft was acquiring Github.

The only regret I have is not evaluating a few other options like Codeberg or whatever. But GitLab's much better than Github.

[-] ISOmorph@feddit.de 18 points 1 year ago

Gitlab requiring a phone number verified account to report bugs kinda turned me off of that platform. Never used Codeberg but heard good things.

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago

I don't have a (usable) phone number.

I've reported bugs.

I've contributed code.

How did I skate?

[-] twei@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

Codeberg is awesome, it's just like github but open source and self-hostable (forgejo)

[-] spez_@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Self hosted gitlab

[-] derpgon@programming.dev 16 points 1 year ago

This has been implemented since like 2016, this is not news lol.

[-] cbarrick@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Searching across repos was disabled for anonymous visitors in 2016.

Searching within a repo was disabled for anonymous visitors in 2023.

[-] phillaholic@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago

Can someone tell me why this is unreasonable?

[-] btp@kbin.social 25 points 1 year ago

I think it kind of flies in the face of what Open Source Software should be. They're walling off code behind accounts in the Microsoft ecosystem.

[-] sparky@lemmy.federate.cc 12 points 1 year ago

I think it’s kind of a slippery slope; but I don’t think the search itself being login walled is apocalyptic. As long as anonymous users can clone the repositories and browse the code, I can kind of understand why they don’t want to pay to run an elastic search cluster for bots’ benefit. Presumably in-repo search could be done locally by scrapers’ hardware.

But if it turns into “login to view this repository” then GitHub will have turned evil.

They're not walling off any code. They're restricting use of their server-side search resources. Other repository hosting services don't have code search at all.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] orcrist@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

It is a betrayal to the developers who put our projects up there. We wanted everything to be freely accessible, and of course this is just another step in enshittification of the service. Remember that many of us have small projects with few viewers, and we know that the extra burden on the server side isn't even measurable. Yet our work is less accessible.

[-] andreluis034@lm.put.tf 3 points 1 year ago

The code is still accessible, you just can't use the code search function in the web, which normal git doesn't have anyway.

[-] orcrist@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Yes, precisely. They built a useful feature and are now trying to wall off the garden. Enshittification.

[-] SheeEttin@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

On its own, it's not. But it's going to be one step on the path to shit-town.

[-] scottmeme@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago

GitLab, OneDev, Gitea, etc > shithub

[-] vox@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 year ago

I'm pretty sure this only applies to non-indexed repos right?
indexing is a very expensive process and usually takes 5-10 minutes for repos with 10k+ lines, and letting non-registered users start it is not the best idea in the first place

[-] fubarx@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

This has been around for a while. It may be so they can track and throttle LLMs hovering up public code repos.

Either way, it's a meh. Not sure why anyone would want to clutch their pearls over this. For those who need it, self-hosted gitlab is available.

[-] lazynooblet@lazysoci.al 4 points 1 year ago

I'm not sure LLMs will need to use the search facility when they could clone the repo.

[-] neo@lemmy.comfysnug.space 2 points 1 year ago
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2023
214 points (94.2% liked)

Technology

35003 readers
164 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS