196
submitted 11 months ago by j0hn@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 27 points 11 months ago

This was a representative of the India Government. Wars have been fought over less.

[-] spaduf@slrpnk.net 19 points 11 months ago

And one in the US apparently

[-] Bassman1805@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

It was an Indian man, but I'm aware of any evidence he was an operative of the Indian government.

Edit: Dumbass me, commenting before reading the article.

[-] naturalgasbad@lemmy.ca 13 points 11 months ago

Naturally, our closest ally did what it does best and told us children (Canada and India) to stop fighting because they had more important interests in Asia.

More important than the literal fucking assassination of Canadian citizens on Canadian soil by a foreign power, apparently. More important than supporting it's single largest trading partner in the world. More important than supporting the country that forms the other half of NORAD.

Then again, the US DOJ literally pushed Bombardier (a Canadian jet aircraft company and massive Canadian employer) to insolvency because it might compete with Boeing. I guess I shouldn't be surprised.

[-] rbesfe@lemmy.ca 6 points 11 months ago

Bombardier killed itself through the incompetence of its management and C-suite, DOJ might not have helped but a good aircraft company should be able to survive without military contracts

[-] naturalgasbad@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 months ago

It wasn't military contracts that killed Bombardier. It was the DOJ blocking Bombardier sales to the US under claims of "dumping"

[-] Stamau123@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Seems a pretty vitriolic response for America releasing details on planned assassinations

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 6 points 11 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


A newly unsealed U.S. criminal indictment has unleashed an unprecedented flood of details about an alleged plot connected to the Indian government to carry out multiple assassinations in North America.

Perhaps the most surprising allegation in the murder-for-hire indictment filed in New York State against Indian national Nikhil Gupta is a claim that there were plans to carry out three such killings on Canadian soil.

The indictment, made public Wednesday, accuses Gupta of attempting this year to arrange one killing in New York after receiving instructions from an Indian government employee.

The Indian government employee is not named in the indictment, but he is described as having held different roles, including intelligence, security management and in India's Central Reserve Police Force.

Last week, the Financial Times reported that U.S. officials had filed a criminal indictment and thwarted a similar plot against Gurpatwant Singh Pannun, a citizen of the U.S. and Canada.

"This is an indictment against Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, a known human-rights violator who has a track record of using violence to suppress criticism and dissenting political opinion," Pannum said.


The original article contains 832 words, the summary contains 179 words. Saved 78%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] GutsBerserk@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Just do whatever you want to, kill whoever you want to... the key word to whitewash everything is "terrorist"!

[-] lustyargonian@lemm.ee 4 points 11 months ago

India be like "we didn't do it but if we did then it was probably coz separatism is terrorism"

this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2023
196 points (98.5% liked)

World News

39099 readers
1766 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS